Amorim-de-Sousa A, Macedo-de-Araújo R, Fernandes P, Queirós A, González-Méijome J M
Clinical Experimental Optometry Research Laboratory (CEORLab), Center of Physics, School of Sciences, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jan 2;2019:2874036. doi: 10.1155/2019/2874036. eCollection 2019.
To evaluate the impact of different levels of positive and negative defocus on light disturbance (LD) measures and to understand how high-order aberrations (HOAs) and topographic quality parameters may influence the perception of photic phenomena.
Thirty young healthy subjects (21 females and 9 males) attended this cross-sectional study. LD was evaluated with the light distortion analyzer (LDA) in natural accommodative and cycloplegic conditions with positive and negative induced defocus of 1.00D. HOAs were taken for a natural mesopic (without cycloplegia) and for fixed 5 mm (with cycloplegia) pupil size. The impact of corneal morphological parameters (SAI, SRI, and Q-value) in LD was also investigated.
Positive and negative induced defocus of 1.00D significantly increased the size of LD ( < 0.010, Wilcoxon signed rank test) but not its irregularity index. Spherical-like HOAs were associated with the size of LD, while coma-like and total-like HOAs were associated with LD irregularity. Our results showed that SRI was significantly correlated with the size of the disturbance area (=0.519, =0.003, Spearman correlation) and SAI with both size (=0.502, =0.005, Spearman correlation) and irregularity (=0.371, =0.044, Spearman correlation). However, no correlation between the Q-value and LD parameters was found.
The uncorrected positive and negative refractive errors might increase the size of the LD, such as the spherical-like HOAs, SAI, and SRI, instead of asphericity. Coma-like and total-like HOAs and SAI may influence the perception of irregularities in the LD shape. These results might have an impact on postrefractive surgery visual performance that should be investigated.
评估不同程度的正、负离焦对光干扰(LD)测量的影响,并了解高阶像差(HOAs)和地形质量参数如何影响光现象的感知。
30名年轻健康受试者(21名女性和9名男性)参与了这项横断面研究。在自然调节和睫状肌麻痹状态下,使用光畸变分析仪(LDA)评估LD,诱导正、负离焦为1.00D。在自然中视状态(无睫状肌麻痹)和固定5mm(有睫状肌麻痹)瞳孔大小时采集HOAs。还研究了角膜形态参数(SAI、SRI和Q值)对LD的影响。
1.00D的正、负诱导离焦显著增加了LD的大小(<0.010,Wilcoxon符号秩检验),但未增加其不规则指数。类球面HOAs与LD的大小相关,而类彗差和总HOAs与LD的不规则性相关。我们的结果表明,SRI与干扰区域的大小显著相关(=0.519,=0.003,Spearman相关性),SAI与大小(=0.502,=0.005,Spearman相关性)和不规则性(=0.371,=0.044,Spearman相关性)均相关。然而,未发现Q值与LD参数之间存在相关性。
未矫正的正、负屈光不正可能会增加LD的大小,如类球面HOAs、SAI和SRI,而非非球面性。类彗差和总HOAs以及SAI可能会影响对LD形状不规则性的感知。这些结果可能会对屈光手术后的视觉性能产生影响,值得进一步研究。