Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚的社会援助金支付与粮食不安全:来自家庭支出调查的证据。

Social Assistance Payments and Food Insecurity inAustralia: Evidence from the HouseholdExpenditure Survey.

机构信息

Demography and Ageing Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia.

College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide 5000, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 4;16(3):455. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030455.

Abstract

It is widely understood that households with low economic resources and poor labourmarket attachment are at considerable risk of food insecurity in Australia. However, little is knownabout variations in food insecurity by receipt of specific classes of social assistance payments thatare made through the social security system. Using newly released data from the 2016 HouseholdExpenditure Survey, this paper reports on variations in food insecurity prevalence across a range ofpayment types. We further investigated measures of financial wellbeing reported by food-insecurehouseholds in receipt of social assistance payments. Results showed that individuals in receiptof Newstart allowance (11%), Austudy/Abstudy (14%), the Disability Support Pension (12%),the Carer Payment (11%) and the Parenting Payment (9%) were at significantly higher risk of foodinsecurity compared to those in receipt of the Age Pension (<1%) or no payment at all (1.3%). Resultsfurther indicated that food-insecure households in receipt of social assistance payments enduredsignificant financial stress, with a large proportion co-currently experiencing "fuel" or "energy"poverty. Our results support calls by a range of Australian non-government organisations, politicians,and academics for a comprehensive review of the Australian social security system.

摘要

人们普遍认为,澳大利亚经济资源匮乏、劳动力市场依附性差的家庭面临着严重的粮食不安全风险。然而,人们对于通过社会保障体系发放的特定类别的社会援助金的领取情况与粮食不安全之间的差异知之甚少。本文利用新发布的 2016 年家庭支出调查数据,报告了一系列不同类型的支付方式下粮食不安全发生率的差异。我们进一步调查了领取社会援助金的粮食不安全家庭报告的财务福利措施。结果表明,与领取老年金(<1%)或根本没有领取任何款项(1.3%)的人相比,领取新起点津贴(11%)、学习津贴(14%)、残疾抚恤金(12%)、照顾者津贴(11%)和育儿津贴(9%)的人面临着更高的粮食不安全风险。结果还表明,领取社会援助金的粮食不安全家庭承受着巨大的经济压力,很大一部分家庭同时面临着“燃料”或“能源”贫困。我们的研究结果支持了一系列澳大利亚非政府组织、政治家和学者的呼吁,要求对澳大利亚社会保障体系进行全面审查。

相似文献

4
Factors related to household food insecurity in the Republic of Korea.韩国家庭粮食不安全相关因素。
Public Health Nutr. 2011 Jun;14(6):1080-7. doi: 10.1017/S1368980010003733. Epub 2011 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

7
Food security among asylum seekers in Melbourne.墨尔本寻求庇护者的食品安全问题。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2015 Aug;39(4):344-9. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12368. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
9
A fair go for health? Not at the moment.健康能得到公平对待吗?目前还不行。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2014 Aug;38(4):302-3. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12273.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验