Sharma Kalpana, Gossen Bruce D, Greenshields David, Selvaraj Gopalan, Strelkov Stephen E, McDonald Mary Ruth
Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1 Canada and Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon Research Centre, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 0X2 Canada.
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon Research Centre.
Plant Dis. 2013 Jun;97(6):720-727. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-08-12-0752-RE.
The clubroot reaction of five Rapid Cycling Brassica Collection (RCBC) lines (Brassica carinata, B. juncea, B. napus, B. oleracea, and B. rapa) and 84 lines of Arabidopsis thaliana to pathotypes 2, 3, 5, and 6 of Plasmodiophora brassicae (as classified on William's system) was assessed. Also, the reaction of the Arabidopsis lines to a single-spore isolate of each of pathotypes 3 and 6 was compared with that of a field isolate. Seedlings were inoculated with resting spores of P. brassicae, maintained at 25 and 20°C (day and night, respectively), and assessed for clubroot incidence and severity at 6 weeks after inoculation. Several lines of A. thaliana and RCBC exhibited a differential response to pathotype but none of the lines were immune. Among the RCBC lines, B. napus was resistant to all of the pathotypes; B. oleracea was resistant to pathotypes 2, 3, and 5; B. carinata and B. rapa were resistant to pathotypes 2 and 5; and B. juncea was susceptible to pathotypes 5 and 6 and had an intermediate response to pathotypes 2 and 3. Line Ct-1 of A. thaliana was highly resistant to pathotype 2, Pu2-23 was highly resistant to pathotype 5, and Ws-2 and Sorbo were highly resistant to pathotype 6. These results indicate that the lines of RCBC and A. thaliana have potential for use as model crops for a wide range of studies on clubroot, and could be used to differentiate these four pathotypes of P. brassicae. The reaction of the RCBC lines to pathotype 6 was highly correlated with response under field conditions but the reaction to the single-spore isolates of pathotypes 3 and 6 was not strongly correlated with reaction to the field collections in the Arabidopsis lines.
评估了五个快速循环芸苔属收集品系(埃塞俄比亚芥、芥菜型油菜、甘蓝型油菜、甘蓝和白菜型油菜)以及84个拟南芥品系对芸苔根肿菌致病型2、3、5和6(按照威廉姆斯系统分类)的根肿病反应。此外,还比较了拟南芥品系对致病型3和6的单孢分离株与田间分离株的反应。用芸苔根肿菌的休眠孢子接种幼苗,分别在25℃和20℃(白天和黑夜)下培养,并在接种后6周评估根肿病的发病率和严重程度。几个拟南芥品系和快速循环芸苔属收集品系对致病型表现出不同的反应,但没有一个品系免疫。在快速循环芸苔属收集品系中,甘蓝型油菜对所有致病型都有抗性;甘蓝对致病型2、3和5有抗性;埃塞俄比亚芥和白菜型油菜对致病型2和5有抗性;芥菜型油菜对致病型5和6敏感,对致病型2和3有中等反应。拟南芥品系Ct-1对致病型2高度抗性,Pu2-23对致病型5高度抗性,Ws-2和Sorbo对致病型6高度抗性。这些结果表明,快速循环芸苔属收集品系和拟南芥品系有潜力用作根肿病广泛研究的模式作物,并可用于区分芸苔根肿菌的这四种致病型。快速循环芸苔属收集品系对致病型6的反应与田间条件下的反应高度相关,但对致病型3和6的单孢分离株的反应与拟南芥品系对田间收集株的反应相关性不强。