• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

放射性肺气肿对肺癌风险评估的影响。

The effect of radiographic emphysema in assessing lung cancer risk.

机构信息

General Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA.

Pulmonary Department, Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.

出版信息

Thorax. 2019 Sep;74(9):858-864. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-212457. Epub 2019 Feb 5.

DOI:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-212457
PMID:30723183
Abstract

PURPOSE

Lung cancer risk models optimise screening by identifying subjects at highest risk, but none of them consider emphysema, a risk factor identifiable on baseline screen. Subjects with a negative baseline low-dose CT (LDCT) screen are at lower risk for subsequent diagnosis and may benefit from risk stratification prior to additional screening, thus we investigated the role of radiographic emphysema as an additional predictor of lung cancer diagnosis in participants with negative baseline LDCT screens of the National Lung Screening Trial.

METHODS

Our cohorts consist of participants with a negative baseline (T0) LDCT screen (n=16 624) and participants who subsequently had a negative 1-year follow-up (T1) screen (n=14 530). Lung cancer risk scores were calculated using the Bach, PLCOm2012 and Liverpool Lung Project models. Risk of incident lung cancer diagnosis at the end of the study and number screened per incident lung cancer were compared between participants with and without radiographic emphysema.

RESULTS

Radiographic emphysema was independently associated with nearly double the hazard of lung cancer diagnosis at both the second (T1) and third (T2) annual LDCT in all three risk models (HR range 1.9-2.0, p<0.001 for all comparisons). The number screened per incident lung cancer was considerably lower in participants with radiographic emphysema (62 vs 28 at T1 and 91 vs 40 at T2).

CONCLUSION

Radiographic emphysema is an independent predictor of lung cancer diagnosis and may help guide decisions surrounding further screening for eligible patients.

摘要

目的

肺癌风险模型通过识别高危人群来优化筛查,但它们都没有考虑到肺气肿,这是基线筛查时可识别的一个风险因素。基线低剂量 CT(LDCT)筛查结果为阴性的受试者发生后续诊断的风险较低,并且可能受益于在进一步筛查前进行风险分层,因此我们研究了在国家肺癌筛查试验中基线 LDCT 筛查结果为阴性的受试者中,放射影像学肺气肿作为肺癌诊断的额外预测因子的作用。

方法

我们的队列包括基线(T0)LDCT 筛查结果为阴性的参与者(n=16624)和随后在 1 年随访(T1)中筛查结果为阴性的参与者(n=14530)。使用 Bach、PLCOm2012 和利物浦肺项目模型计算肺癌风险评分。比较有和无放射影像学肺气肿的参与者在研究结束时发生肺癌诊断的风险和每例肺癌诊断的筛查人数。

结果

在所有三种风险模型中,放射影像学肺气肿与第二次(T1)和第三次(T2)年度 LDCT 时肺癌诊断的风险几乎增加了一倍(HR 范围为 1.9-2.0,所有比较均<0.001)。在有放射影像学肺气肿的参与者中,每例肺癌诊断的筛查人数明显减少(T1 时为 62 例与 28 例,T2 时为 91 例与 40 例)。

结论

放射影像学肺气肿是肺癌诊断的独立预测因子,可能有助于指导符合条件的患者进一步筛查的决策。

相似文献

1
The effect of radiographic emphysema in assessing lung cancer risk.放射性肺气肿对肺癌风险评估的影响。
Thorax. 2019 Sep;74(9):858-864. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-212457. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
2
Lung cancer incidence and mortality in National Lung Screening Trial participants who underwent low-dose CT prevalence screening: a retrospective cohort analysis of a randomised, multicentre, diagnostic screening trial.接受低剂量CT筛查的国家肺癌筛查试验参与者的肺癌发病率和死亡率:一项随机、多中心诊断性筛查试验的回顾性队列分析
Lancet Oncol. 2016 May;17(5):590-9. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00621-X. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
3
Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment of Pulmonary Emphysema with T2-Weighted PROPELLER MRI in a High-Risk Population Compared to Low-Dose CT.与低剂量CT相比,在高危人群中使用T2加权螺旋桨MRI对肺气肿进行定量和定性评估
Rofo. 2018 Aug;190(8):733-739. doi: 10.1055/a-0577-5619. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
4
Incidental Findings on Low-Dose CT Scan Lung Cancer Screenings and Deaths From Respiratory Diseases.低剂量 CT 扫描肺癌筛查中的偶然发现与呼吸系统疾病导致的死亡。
Chest. 2022 Apr;161(4):1092-1100. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.11.015. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
5
Assessing the relationship between lung cancer risk and emphysema detected on low-dose CT of the chest.评估胸部低剂量CT检测出的肺癌风险与肺气肿之间的关系。
Chest. 2007 Dec;132(6):1932-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-1490.
6
Improving selection criteria for lung cancer screening. The potential role of emphysema.改善肺癌筛查的选择标准。肺气肿的潜在作用。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Apr 15;191(8):924-31. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201410-1848OC.
7
Quantitative Emphysema on Low-Dose CT Imaging of the Chest and Risk of Lung Cancer and Airflow Obstruction: An Analysis of the National Lung Screening Trial.胸部低剂量 CT 成像定量肺气肿与肺癌及气流阻塞风险:国家肺癌筛查试验分析。
Chest. 2021 May;159(5):1812-1820. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.12.004. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
8
Significant Incidental Findings in the National Lung Screening Trial.国家肺癌筛查试验中的重要偶发发现。
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Jul 1;183(7):677-684. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.1116.
9
Development and Validation of a Multivariable Lung Cancer Risk Prediction Model That Includes Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening Results: A Secondary Analysis of Data From the National Lung Screening Trial.多变量肺癌风险预测模型的建立与验证,该模型包含低剂量计算机断层扫描筛查结果:国家肺癌筛查试验数据的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e190204. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0204.
10
Low-dose volumetric computed tomography for quantification of emphysema in asymptomatic smokers participating in an early lung cancer detection trial.低剂量容积 CT 对参加早期肺癌筛查试验的无症状吸烟者肺气肿的定量评估。
J Thorac Imaging. 2009 Aug;24(3):206-11. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0b013e3181a65263.

引用本文的文献

1
Lessons Learned From International Lung Cancer Screening Trials; People at Risk Deserve Screening for Early Detection.从国际肺癌筛查试验中吸取的经验教训;高危人群值得进行筛查以实现早期发现。
Respirology. 2025 Sep;30(9):802-816. doi: 10.1111/resp.70097. Epub 2025 Aug 14.
2
Pros and cons of reporting incidental findings in lung cancer screening.肺癌筛查中报告偶然发现的利弊。
Eur Radiol. 2025 Apr 15. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11580-7.
3
The association between emphysema detected on computed tomography and increased risk of lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
计算机断层扫描检测到的肺气肿与肺癌风险增加之间的关联:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Mar 3;15(3):2193-2208. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-1879. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
4
The pros and cons of lung cancer screening.肺癌筛查的利弊。
Eur Radiol. 2025 Jan;35(1):267-275. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10939-6. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
5
The association of chest computed tomography-defined visual emphysema and prognosis in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer.胸部计算机断层扫描定义的视觉性肺气肿与非小细胞肺癌患者预后的相关性
ERJ Open Res. 2023 Nov 20;9(6). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00195-2023. eCollection 2023 Nov.
6
Quantifying emphysema in lung screening computed tomography with robust automated lobe segmentation.通过稳健的自动肺叶分割对肺部筛查计算机断层扫描中的肺气肿进行量化。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2023 Jul;10(4):044002. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.10.4.044002. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
7
Argentine consensus recommendations for lung cancer screening programmes: a RAND/UCLA-modified Delphi study.阿根廷肺癌筛查计划共识推荐:RAND/UCLA 改良 Delphi 研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 3;13(2):e068271. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068271.
8
Evaluation of emphysema on thoracic low-dose CTs through attention-based multiple instance deep learning.基于注意力的多实例深度学习在胸部低剂量 CT 肺气肿评估中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 21;13(1):1187. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-27549-9.
9
Important parameters for cost-effective implementation of lung cancer screening.实现肺癌筛查具有成本效益的重要参数。
Br J Radiol. 2023 Apr 1;96(1145):20220489. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220489. Epub 2023 Jan 14.
10
The clinical relevance of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with lung cancer.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值及血小板与淋巴细胞比值在慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并肺癌中的临床意义
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 27;12:902955. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.902955. eCollection 2022.