• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种机器学习算法,用于优化从临床编码中自动检测药物不良反应。

A Machine-Learning Algorithm to Optimise Automated Adverse Drug Reaction Detection from Clinical Coding.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Austin Health, Level 5, Lance Townsend Building, Studley Rd, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia.

Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Drug Saf. 2019 Jun;42(6):721-725. doi: 10.1007/s40264-018-00794-y.

DOI:10.1007/s40264-018-00794-y
PMID:30725336
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Adverse drug reaction (ADR) detection in hospitals is heavily reliant on spontaneous reporting by clinical staff, with studies in the literature pointing to high rates of underreporting [1]. International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes have been used in epidemiological studies of ADRs and offer the potential for automated ADR detection systems.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to develop an automated ADR detection system based on ICD-10 codes, using machine-learning algorithms to improve accuracy and efficiency.

METHODS

For a 12-month period from December 2016 to November 2017, every inpatient episode receiving an ICD-10 code in the range Y40.0-Y59.9 (ADR code) was flagged for review as a potential ADR. Each flagged admission was assessed by an expert pharmacist and, if needed, reviewed at regular ADR committee meetings. For each report, a determination was made about ADR probability and severity. The dataset was randomly split into training and test sets. A machine-learning model using the random forest algorithm was developed on the training set to discriminate between true and false ADR reports. The model was then applied to the test set to assess accuracy using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC).

RESULTS

In the study period, 2917 Y40.0-Y59.9 codes were applied to admissions, resulting in 245 ADR reports after review. These 245 reports accounted for 44.5% of all ADR reporting in our hospital in the study period. A random forest model built on the training set was able to discriminate between true and false reports on the test set with an AUC of 0.803.

CONCLUSIONS

Automated ADR detection using ICD-10 coding significantly improved ADR detection in the study period, with improved discrimination between true and false reports by applying a machine-learning model.

摘要

简介

医院内药物不良反应(ADR)的检测主要依赖于临床医护人员的自发报告,文献中的研究表明报告率普遍较低[1]。国际疾病分类第 10 版(ICD-10)代码已被用于 ADR 的流行病学研究,并为自动 ADR 检测系统提供了潜力。

目的

本研究旨在开发一种基于 ICD-10 代码的自动 ADR 检测系统,使用机器学习算法提高准确性和效率。

方法

在 2016 年 12 月至 2017 年 11 月的 12 个月期间,对每个应用 ICD-10 代码 Y40.0-Y59.9(ADR 代码)范围的住院患者进行标记,以便对其进行潜在 ADR 的审查。对每个标记的入院病例由一名专家药剂师进行评估,如果需要,在常规 ADR 委员会会议上进行审查。对于每个报告,确定 ADR 的可能性和严重程度。数据集被随机分为训练集和测试集。在训练集上使用随机森林算法开发了一个机器学习模型,以区分真实和虚假的 ADR 报告。然后将模型应用于测试集,使用接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线下的面积(AUC)来评估准确性。

结果

在研究期间,共应用了 2917 个 Y40.0-Y59.9 代码,审查后得出 245 份 ADR 报告。这些报告占研究期间我院所有 ADR 报告的 44.5%。在训练集上构建的随机森林模型能够在测试集上区分真实和虚假报告,AUC 为 0.803。

结论

使用 ICD-10 编码进行自动 ADR 检测在研究期间显著提高了 ADR 的检测率,通过应用机器学习模型提高了真实和虚假报告之间的区分度。

相似文献

1
A Machine-Learning Algorithm to Optimise Automated Adverse Drug Reaction Detection from Clinical Coding.一种机器学习算法,用于优化从临床编码中自动检测药物不良反应。
Drug Saf. 2019 Jun;42(6):721-725. doi: 10.1007/s40264-018-00794-y.
2
Diagnosis-based and external cause-based criteria to identify adverse drug reactions in hospital ICD-coded data: application to an Australia population-based study.基于诊断和外部病因的标准,用于识别医院ICD编码数据中的药物不良反应:应用于澳大利亚基于人群的研究。
Public Health Res Pract. 2017 Apr 27;27(2):2721716. doi: 10.17061/phrp2721716.
3
Prospective identification versus administrative coding of adverse drug reaction-related hospitalizations in the elderly: A comparative analysis.老年患者药物不良反应相关住院的前瞻性识别与行政编码:一项比较分析。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018 Nov;27(11):1281-1285. doi: 10.1002/pds.4667. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
4
Clinical coding of prospectively identified paediatric adverse drug reactions--a retrospective review of patient records.前瞻性识别的儿科药物不良反应的临床编码——对患者记录的回顾性审查
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2014 Dec 17;15:72. doi: 10.1186/2050-6511-15-72.
5
Detection of serious adverse drug reactions using diagnostic codes in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems.使用《国际疾病分类》中的诊断代码检测严重药物不良反应。
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Jul 23;27(3):e35-e48. doi: 10.15586/jptcp.v27i3.705.
6
Automation of penicillin adverse drug reaction categorisation and risk stratification with machine learning natural language processing.利用机器学习自然语言处理实现青霉素药物不良反应分类和风险分层的自动化。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Dec;156:104611. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104611. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
7
Prediction of adverse drug reactions using demographic and non-clinical drug characteristics in FAERS data.利用 FAERS 数据中的人口统计学和非临床药物特征预测药物不良反应。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 9;14(1):23636. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74505-2.
8
Supervised signal detection for adverse drug reactions in medication dispensing data.基于配药数据的药物不良反应的有监督信号检测。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018 Jul;161:25-38. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.03.021. Epub 2018 Apr 14.
9
Detection of adverse drug reactions through the minimum basic data set.通过最小基本数据集检测药物不良反应。
Pharm World Sci. 2010 Jun;32(3):322-8. doi: 10.1007/s11096-010-9372-2. Epub 2010 Mar 6.
10
Trends in hospital admissions for adverse drug reactions in England: analysis of national hospital episode statistics 1998-2005.英格兰药品不良反应住院情况趋势:1998 - 2005年国家医院住院病例统计分析
BMC Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Sep 25;7:9. doi: 10.1186/1472-6904-7-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial intelligence in pharmacovigilance: a narrative review and practical experience with an expert-defined Bayesian network tool.药物警戒中的人工智能:一项叙述性综述及使用专家定义的贝叶斯网络工具的实践经验
Int J Clin Pharm. 2025 Aug;47(4):932-944. doi: 10.1007/s11096-025-01975-3. Epub 2025 Jul 30.
2
Serious Adverse Events: A Replicability and Validation Study of Naranjo Causality Assessment Tool in a Canadian Clinical Setting.严重不良事件:加拿大临床环境中Naranjo因果关系评估工具的可重复性与验证研究
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Apr;31(3):e70110. doi: 10.1111/jep.70110.
3
LEVERAGING UNSTRUCTURED DATA IN ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS TO DETECT ADVERSE EVENTS FROM PEDIATRIC DRUG USE - A SCOPING REVIEW.

本文引用的文献

1
Pharmacovigilance and expedited drug approvals.药物警戒与加速药物审批
Aust Prescr. 2018 Apr;41(2):50-53. doi: 10.18773/austprescr.2018.010. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
2
Systematic review of predictive risk models for adverse drug events in hospitalized patients.系统评价住院患者药物不良事件预测风险模型。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 May;84(5):846-864. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13514. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
3
Diagnosis-based and external cause-based criteria to identify adverse drug reactions in hospital ICD-coded data: application to an Australia population-based study.
利用电子健康记录中的非结构化数据检测儿科用药不良事件——一项范围综述
medRxiv. 2025 Mar 20:2025.03.20.25324320. doi: 10.1101/2025.03.20.25324320.
4
The impact of transition to a digital hospital on medication errors (TIME study).向数字化医院转型对用药错误的影响(时间研究)
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Jul 25;6(1):133. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00877-w.
5
Linking Activity Theory Within User-Centered Design: Novel Framework to Inform Design and Evaluation of Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems in Pharmacy.将活动理论与以用户为中心的设计相结合:为药房药物不良反应报告系统的设计和评估提供信息的新框架。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Feb 24;10:e43529. doi: 10.2196/43529.
6
An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Support Detection of Neonatal Adverse Drug Reactions Based on Severity and Probability Scores: A New Risk Score as Web-Tool.一种基于严重程度和概率评分支持新生儿药物不良反应检测的人工智能方法:作为网络工具的新风险评分
Children (Basel). 2022 Nov 26;9(12):1826. doi: 10.3390/children9121826.
7
Machine Learning in Causal Inference: Application in Pharmacovigilance.机器学习在因果推断中的应用:在药物警戒中的应用。
Drug Saf. 2022 May;45(5):459-476. doi: 10.1007/s40264-022-01155-6. Epub 2022 May 17.
8
Intelligent Telehealth in Pharmacovigilance: A Future Perspective.智能药物警戒中的远程医疗:未来展望。
Drug Saf. 2022 May;45(5):449-458. doi: 10.1007/s40264-022-01172-5. Epub 2022 May 17.
9
Development and Implementation of an e-Trigger Tool for Adverse Drug Events in a Swiss University Hospital.瑞士大学医院药物不良事件电子触发工具的开发与实施
Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 24;13:251-263. doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S334987. eCollection 2021.
10
Machine learning risk prediction model for acute coronary syndrome and death from use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in administrative data.基于行政数据的机器学习急性冠状动脉综合征和非甾体抗炎药使用相关死亡风险预测模型。
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 15;11(1):18314. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97643-3.
基于诊断和外部病因的标准,用于识别医院ICD编码数据中的药物不良反应:应用于澳大利亚基于人群的研究。
Public Health Res Pract. 2017 Apr 27;27(2):2721716. doi: 10.17061/phrp2721716.
4
Perceived barriers to reporting adverse drug events in hospitals: a qualitative study using theoretical domains framework approach.医院中上报药品不良事件的感知障碍:一项采用理论域框架方法的定性研究
Implement Sci. 2015 Aug 7;10:110. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0302-5.
5
ICD-10 codes used to identify adverse drug events in administrative data: a systematic review.用于在行政数据中识别药物不良事件的 ICD-10 代码:系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 May-Jun;21(3):547-57. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002116. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
6
Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.基于坐标下降法的广义线性模型正则化路径
J Stat Softw. 2010;33(1):1-22.
7
Demystifying medication safety: making sense of the terminology.揭开药物安全的神秘面纱:理解相关术语
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2006 Jun;2(2):280-9. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2006.01.001.
8
Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions : a systematic review.药品不良反应报告不足:一项系统评价
Drug Saf. 2006;29(5):385-96. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200629050-00003.
9
Index for rating diagnostic tests.诊断试验评级指数。
Cancer. 1950 Jan;3(1):32-5. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32::aid-cncr2820030106>3.0.co;2-3.
10
A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions.一种估算药物不良反应概率的方法。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1981 Aug;30(2):239-45. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1981.154.