a School of Social Sciences, Humanities, & Arts , University of California , Merced , USA.
J Health Commun. 2019;24(1):75-83. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2019.1574320. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
Accurate, timely information can be a powerful tool to mitigate harmful effects of air pollution. While national guidelines for environmental risk communication - based on risk and crisis communication principles - exist, little is known how these are operationalized, nor about the effectiveness of existing communication efforts. Moreover, a growing literature on environmental health literacy suggests that communication about environmental risks must move beyond individual behavior education to empower communities to mobilize to reduce environmental threats. This study aimed to identify and critically evaluate public sources of information about the causes and controllability of air pollution and its health effects, and potential disparities in information reach and utility. The case study triangulated data from three sources: Systematic analysis of the public information environment, interviews with regional expert stakeholders, and interviews with community residents. Three themes emerged: 1) Lack of clarity about responsibility for communicating about air quality (information sources), 2) Existing air quality communication strategies lack critical information including risk mitigation behaviors and long-term health impacts (information quality), and 3) Existing air quality communications fail to reach vulnerable populations (information reach). This study demonstrates that air quality communication is lacking yet crucially needed. Information about air pollution and health risks focuses on individual risk behaviors but is disseminated using channels that are unlikely to reach the most vulnerable populations. We discuss opportunities to improve the reach and impact of communication of air quality health risks, an increasingly important global priority, situating our argument within a critical environmental health literacy perspective.
准确、及时的信息是减轻空气污染危害的有力工具。虽然存在基于风险和危机沟通原则的国家环境风险沟通指南,但对于这些指南如何实施以及现有沟通工作的效果知之甚少。此外,越来越多的关于环境健康素养的文献表明,关于环境风险的沟通必须超越个体行为教育,以使社区有能力动员起来减少环境威胁。本研究旨在确定和批判性评估有关空气污染的原因和可控性及其健康影响的公共信息来源,以及信息获取和利用方面的潜在差异。该案例研究从三个来源进行了三角分析:对公共信息环境的系统分析、对区域专家利益相关者的访谈以及对社区居民的访谈。三个主题出现了:1)关于空气质量沟通责任的不明确(信息来源),2)现有的空气质量沟通策略缺乏关键信息,包括风险缓解行为和长期健康影响(信息质量),以及 3)现有的空气质量沟通未能覆盖弱势群体(信息获取)。本研究表明,空气质量沟通存在不足,但至关重要。关于空气污染和健康风险的信息侧重于个体风险行为,但通过不太可能覆盖最弱势群体的渠道传播。我们讨论了改善空气质量健康风险沟通的范围和影响的机会,这是一个日益重要的全球优先事项,我们将我们的论点置于批判性环境健康素养的视角内。