School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
School of Finance and Public Administration, Hubei University of Economics, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 28;21(1):885. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06877-4.
Extending service scope of primary care facilities (PCFs) has been widely concerned in China. However, no current data about association between service scope of PCFs with patient outcomes are available. This study aims to investigate association between service scope of PCFs and patient outcomes.
A multistage, stratified clustered sampling method was used to collect information about service scope of PCFs from rural Guizhou, China. Claim data of 299,633 inpatient cases covered by 64 PCFs were derived from local information system of New Rural Cooperation Medical Scheme. Service scope of PCFs was collected with self-administrated questionnaires. Primary outcomes were (1) level of inpatient institutions, (2) length of stay, (3) per capita total health cost, (4) per capita out-of-pocket cost, (5) reimbursement ratio, (6) 30-day readmission. A total of 64 PCFs were categorized into five groups per facility-level service scope scores. Generalized linear regression models, logistic regression model, and ordinal regression model were conducted to identify association between service scope of PCFs and patient outcomes.
On average, the median service scope score of PCFs was 20, with wide variation across PCFs. After controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics, patients living in communities with PCFs of greatest service scope (Quintile V vs. I) tended to have smaller rates of admission by county-level hospitals (-6.2 % [-6.5 %, -5.9 %], city-level hospitals (-1.9 % [-2.0 %, -1.8 %]), and provincial hospitals (-2.1 % [-2.2 %, -2.0 %]), smaller rate of 30-day readmission (-0.5 % [-0.7 %, -0.2 %]), less total health cost (-201.8 [-257.9, -145.8]) and out-of-pocket cost (-210.2 [-237.2, -183.2]), and greater reimbursement ratio (2.3 % [1.9 %, 2.8 %]) than their counterparts from communities with PCFs of least service scope.
Service scope of PCFs varied a lot in rural Guizhou, China. Greater service scope was associated with a reduction in secondary and tertiary hospital admission, reduced total cost and out-of-pocket cost, and 30-day readmission and increased reimbursement ratio. These results raised concerns about access to care for patients discharged from hospitals, which suggests potential opportunities for cost savings and improvement of quality of care. However, further evidence is warranted to investigate whether extending service scope of PCFs is cost-effective and sustainable.
扩大基层医疗机构(PCF)的服务范围在中国受到广泛关注。然而,目前尚无关于 PCF 服务范围与患者结局之间关联的相关数据。本研究旨在调查 PCF 服务范围与患者结局之间的关联。
采用多阶段、分层聚类抽样方法,从中国贵州农村地区收集 PCF 服务范围信息。从当地新型农村合作医疗信息系统中获得了覆盖 64 家 PCF 的 299633 例住院患者的索赔数据。使用自填式问卷收集 PCF 的服务范围信息。主要结局指标为(1)住院机构级别,(2)住院时间,(3)人均总医疗费用,(4)人均自付费用,(5)报销比例,(6)30 天内再入院率。根据设施级别服务范围得分,将 64 家 PCF 分为五组。采用广义线性回归模型、逻辑回归模型和有序回归模型,确定 PCF 服务范围与患者结局之间的关联。
平均而言,PCF 的服务范围中位数得分为 20 分,各 PCF 之间差异较大。在控制人口统计学和临床特征后,居住在服务范围最大的 PCF 社区(五分位 V 与一分位 I)的患者倾向于较少入住县级医院(-6.2%[-6.5%,-5.9%])、市级医院(-1.9%[-2.0%,-1.8%])和省级医院(-2.1%[-2.2%,-2.0%]),30 天内再入院率较低(-0.5%[-0.7%,-0.2%]),总医疗费用较少(-201.8[-257.9,-145.8])和自付费用较少(-210.2[-237.2,-183.2]),报销比例较高(2.3%[1.9%,2.8%])。
中国贵州农村地区 PCF 的服务范围差异很大。更大的服务范围与二级和三级医院入院减少、总费用和自付费用减少、30 天内再入院率和报销比例增加有关。这些结果引起了人们对从医院出院的患者获得医疗服务的关注,这表明在节省成本和提高医疗质量方面存在潜在机会。然而,需要进一步的证据来调查扩大 PCF 服务范围是否具有成本效益和可持续性。