Suppr超能文献

对于紧急开始的腹膜透析,外科置入腹膜透析导管是否安全?

Is surgical PD catheter insertion safe for urgent-start peritoneal dialysis?

作者信息

Javaid Muhammad M, Khan Behram A, Subramanian Srinivas

机构信息

School of Rural Health Mildura, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Department of Medicine, Mildura Base Hospital, Mildura, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Semin Dial. 2019 May;32(3):225-228. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12774. Epub 2019 Feb 8.

Abstract

Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (USPD) is increasingly seen as a viable alternative to hemodialysis through a central venous catheter for late-presenting end-stage renal disease patients. However, concerns remain about starting dialysis early following the surgical implantation of the peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter; urgent PD is often thought to be a safe option only after minimally invasive percutaneous catheter insertions. Analysis of the cumulative data from published literature presented in this review appears to negate this general perception and shows that compared to the percutaneous catheter insertions, starting PD urgently following surgically placed catheter is not associated with more catheter leaks, dysfunctions, or other complications. The outcome of USPD is independent of the mode of catheter insertion. Instead, measures to minimize intra-peritoneal pressure including using the low initial dwell volume based on patient's weight and body habitus and keeping patients in strict supine posture during exchanges in the first 2 weeks of treatment are the two most important factors ensuring a minimization of the risk of catheter-related complications.

摘要

对于晚期出现的终末期肾病患者,紧急启动腹膜透析(USPD)越来越被视为通过中心静脉导管进行血液透析的可行替代方案。然而,对于在腹膜透析(PD)导管手术植入后尽早开始透析仍存在担忧;紧急腹膜透析通常仅在微创经皮导管插入术后才被认为是一种安全的选择。对本综述中发表文献的累积数据进行分析似乎否定了这种普遍看法,并表明与经皮导管插入相比,在手术放置导管后紧急开始腹膜透析与更多的导管渗漏、功能障碍或其他并发症无关。紧急腹膜透析的结果与导管插入方式无关。相反,通过根据患者体重和体型使用低初始驻留量以及在治疗的前两周交换期间让患者保持严格仰卧姿势来尽量减少腹腔内压力的措施是确保将导管相关并发症风险降至最低的两个最重要因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验