• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

耐药性癫痫患者的癫痫持续时间、癫痫控制和脑电图异常对认知障碍的影响。

Impact of epilepsy duration, seizure control and EEG abnormalities on cognitive impairment in drug-resistant epilepsy patients.

机构信息

Faculty of Medical Sciences, Department of Neurology, University of Kragujevac, Serbia, 69 Svetozara Markovica St., 34000, Kragujevac, Serbia.

Clinic of Neurology, Clinical Center Kragujevac, 30 Zmaj Jovina St., 34000, Kragujevac, Serbia.

出版信息

Acta Neurol Belg. 2019 Sep;119(3):403-410. doi: 10.1007/s13760-019-01090-x. Epub 2019 Feb 8.

DOI:10.1007/s13760-019-01090-x
PMID:30737651
Abstract

Cognitive impairment frequently occurs in epilepsy patients. Patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) have poor drug responsivity and higher seizure frequency which consequently lead to brain damage and may have implications on cognitive status. In the present study, we assessed a frequency and degree of cognitive impairment in 52 patients with drug-sensitive epilepsy (DSE) and 103 DRE patients at three time points (baseline, after 12 and 18 months). Degree of cognitive decline was assessed with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scale. We examined the possible correlation between demographic and clinical characteristics and cognitive deterioration in epilepsy patients. Patients in the DRE group had significantly lower MoCA score than patients in the DSE group at baseline (28.83 ± 2.05 vs. 29.69 ± 0.61, p = 0.003), after 12 months (27.36 ± 2.40 vs. 29.58 ± 1.22, p = 0.000) and 18 months (26.86 ± 2.73 vs. 29.33 ± 1.47, p = 0.000). Patients with DRF epilepsy had significantly lower MoCA score than patients with DSF epilepsy at three time points (28.71 ± 2.48 vs. 29.86 ± 0.35, p = 0.015; 27.22 ± 2.72 vs. 29.52 ± 1.37, p = 0.000; 26.80 ± 2.99 vs. 29.31 ± 1.56, p = 0.000). After 12 and 18 months of follow-up, patients with DRG epilepsy had significantly lower MoCA score than patients with DSG epilepsy (27.52 ± 2.01 vs. 29.65 ± 1.02, p = 0.000; 26.94 ± 2.43 vs. 29.35 ± 1.40, p = 0.000). Illness duration negatively correlated with cognitive status (p = 0.005); seizure control and EEG findings positively correlated with MoCA score (p = 0.000). Illness duration, seizure control, drug responsivity, and EEG findings are significant predictors of MoCA score (p < 0.05). Clinicians have to pay attention to patients with drug-resistant epilepsy and concepts of aggressive treatment to minimize the adverse effects of epilepsy on cognition.

摘要

认知障碍在癫痫患者中经常发生。耐药性癫痫(DRE)患者药物反应差,发作频率较高,导致脑损伤,可能对认知状态产生影响。在本研究中,我们在三个时间点(基线、12 个月和 18 个月)评估了 52 例药物敏感型癫痫(DSE)患者和 103 例 DRE 患者的频率和认知障碍程度。使用蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)评估认知下降程度。我们研究了癫痫患者的人口统计学和临床特征与认知恶化之间的可能相关性。DRE 组患者的 MoCA 评分明显低于 DSE 组患者的 MoCA 评分,在基线时(28.83±2.05 与 29.69±0.61,p=0.003)、12 个月后(27.36±2.40 与 29.58±1.22,p=0.000)和 18 个月后(26.86±2.73 与 29.33±1.47,p=0.000)。DRF 癫痫患者的 MoCA 评分明显低于 DSF 癫痫患者的 MoCA 评分,在三个时间点均如此(28.71±2.48 与 29.86±0.35,p=0.015;27.22±2.72 与 29.52±1.37,p=0.000;26.80±2.99 与 29.31±1.56,p=0.000)。在 12 个月和 18 个月的随访后,DRG 癫痫患者的 MoCA 评分明显低于 DSG 癫痫患者(27.52±2.01 与 29.65±1.02,p=0.000;26.94±2.43 与 29.35±1.40,p=0.000)。病程与认知状态呈负相关(p=0.005);癫痫控制和脑电图结果与 MoCA 评分呈正相关(p=0.000)。病程、癫痫控制、药物反应性和脑电图结果是 MoCA 评分的显著预测因素(p<0.05)。临床医生必须关注耐药性癫痫患者,并采取积极治疗的理念,以最大限度地减少癫痫对认知的不利影响。

相似文献

1
Impact of epilepsy duration, seizure control and EEG abnormalities on cognitive impairment in drug-resistant epilepsy patients.耐药性癫痫患者的癫痫持续时间、癫痫控制和脑电图异常对认知障碍的影响。
Acta Neurol Belg. 2019 Sep;119(3):403-410. doi: 10.1007/s13760-019-01090-x. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
2
Seizure response to perampanel in drug-resistant epilepsy with gliomas: early observations.吡仑帕奈对耐药性胶质瘤癫痫的发作反应:早期观察
J Neurooncol. 2017 Jul;133(3):603-607. doi: 10.1007/s11060-017-2473-1. Epub 2017 May 10.
3
Cannabidiol-enriched oil for adult patients with drug-resistant epilepsy: Prospective clinical and electrophysiological study.含大麻二酚的油治疗耐药性癫痫的成年患者:前瞻性临床和电生理研究。
Epilepsia. 2024 Aug;65(8):2270-2279. doi: 10.1111/epi.18025. Epub 2024 May 29.
4
[Effects of early intervention training on cognitive impairment in critical patients].[早期干预训练对危重症患者认知障碍的影响]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 Mar;31(3):298-302. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.03.008.
5
[Clinical study on the factors associated with long-term cognitive function in patients with sepsis].[脓毒症患者长期认知功能相关因素的临床研究]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 May;31(5):614-618. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.05.018.
6
Factors for cognitive impairment in adult epileptic patients.成人癫痫患者认知障碍的因素。
Brain Behav. 2020 Jan;10(1):e01475. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1475. Epub 2019 Dec 21.
7
Cognitive function and left ventricular assist device implantation.认知功能与左心室辅助装置植入。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015 Nov;34(11):1398-405. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2015.05.015. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
8
Montreal Cognitive Assessment in cryptogenic epilepsy patients with normal Mini-Mental State Examination scores.蒙特利尔认知评估在简易精神状态检查评分正常的隐源性癫痫患者中的应用。
Epileptic Disord. 2011 Dec;13(4):375-81. doi: 10.1684/epd.2011.0469.
9
Long-term outcomes in temporal lobe epilepsy with glutamate decarboxylase antibodies.谷氨酸脱羧酶抗体相关颞叶癫痫的长期预后。
J Neurol. 2020 Jul;267(7):2083-2089. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-09807-2. Epub 2020 Mar 28.
10
Cognitive impairment in epilepsy patients and its correlations.癫痫患者的认知障碍及其相关性。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2024 Nov-Dec;31(6):1405-1410. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2022.2133606. Epub 2022 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Task-Evoked Theta Oscillation Dysregulation Underlies Attention Network Deficits in Left Temporal Lobe Drug-Resistant Epilepsy.任务诱发的theta振荡失调是左侧颞叶药物难治性癫痫注意力网络缺陷的基础。
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2025 Jun;31(6):e70450. doi: 10.1111/cns.70450.
2
Clinical and biochemical assessments of circulating High Mobility Group Box Protein1 in children with epilepsy: relation to cognitive function and drug responsiveness.癫痫患儿循环中高迁移率族蛋白1的临床与生化评估:与认知功能及药物反应性的关系
Neurol Sci. 2025 Feb;46(2):887-897. doi: 10.1007/s10072-024-07795-z. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
3
Influence of Epilepsy Characteristics on the Anxiety Occurrence.
癫痫特征对焦虑发生的影响。
Brain Sci. 2024 Aug 26;14(9):858. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14090858.
4
Evaluating the serum levels of zinc, copper, magnesium, and 25-hydroxy vitamin D in children with idiopathic drug-resistant epilepsy; a cross-sectional study.评估特发性耐药性癫痫儿童血清锌、铜、镁和 25-羟维生素 D 水平:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2024 Aug 10;24(1):518. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-04968-9.
5
Association between depressive and anxious symptoms with cognitive function and quality of life in drug-resistant epilepsy.难治性癫痫中抑郁和焦虑症状与认知功能及生活质量的关联
Heliyon. 2023 Oct 14;9(10):e20903. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20903. eCollection 2023 Oct.
6
Twenty-five years of epilepsy surgery at a Central European comprehensive epilepsy center-Trends in intervention delay and outcomes.中欧综合癫痫中心 25 年癫痫手术经验-干预延迟和结果趋势。
Epilepsia Open. 2023 Sep;8(3):991-1001. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12769. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
7
Performance of dialysis patients on the standard and basic Arabic versions of the Montreal Cognitive Assessments.透析患者在蒙特利尔认知评估的标准和基础阿拉伯语版本上的表现。
Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2023 Apr;28(2):100-107. doi: 10.17712/nsj.2023.2.20220110.
8
An objective model for diagnosing comorbid cognitive impairment in patients with epilepsy based on the clinical-EEG functional connectivity features.基于临床脑电图功能连接特征诊断癫痫患者共病认知障碍的客观模型
Front Neurosci. 2023 Jan 12;16:1060814. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1060814. eCollection 2022.
9
Cognitive impairment in people with epilepsy: Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) as a screening tool.癫痫患者的认知障碍:以蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)作为筛查工具
Acta Neurol Belg. 2023 Apr;123(2):451-456. doi: 10.1007/s13760-022-02046-4. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
10
Presurgical cognitive status in patients with low-grade glioma and epilepsy: Testing the effects of seizures, antiseizure medications, and tumor localization.低级别胶质瘤伴癫痫患者的术前认知状态:检测癫痫发作、抗癫痫药物和肿瘤定位的影响。
Brain Behav. 2022 May;12(5):e2560. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2560. Epub 2022 Apr 4.