• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大孕妇对唐氏综合征无创产前检测的偏好:她们想要的信息、获取信息的方式以及希望与之讨论的对象。

Canadian Pregnant Women's Preferences Regarding NIPT for Down Syndrome: The Information They Want, How They Want to Get It, and With Whom They Want to Discuss It.

作者信息

Laberge Anne-Marie, Birko Stanislav, Lemoine Marie-Ève, Le Clerc-Blain Jessica, Haidar Hazar, Affdal Aliya O, Dupras Charles, Ravitsky Vardit

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC; Service de génétique médicale, Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montréal, QC; Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montréal, QC.

Bioethics Program, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019 Jun;41(6):782-791. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.11.003. Epub 2019 Feb 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.jogc.2018.11.003
PMID:30738740
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to assess Canadian pregnant women's and their partners' preferences for information about non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT).

METHODS

Pregnant women and their partners across Canada were surveyed as part of the Personalized Genomics for prenatal Aneuploidy Screening Using maternal blood (PEGASUS) study.

RESULTS

A total of 882 pregnant women and 395 partners participated. Women preferred being informed by a physician (77.2%). They preferred getting information ahead of time, except for information about resources for families with Down syndrome, which they preferred getting with test results. More than half thought that written consent is important (63.7%) and could decide whether to do NIPT on the day they received the information (54.9%). Women preferred to be informed of results by telephone (43.7%) or in person (28%), but they preferred in person if they were considered at high risk for Down syndrome on the basis of the results (76%). The partner was the person whose input was considered most important (62.6%). Partners' preferences were similar, except that partners tended to want information later (at the time of the test or with the results) and felt that their opinion was not considered as highly by health professionals.

CONCLUSION

Canadian women want information about NIPT early, in person, by a knowledgeable physician. Partners also want to be informed and involved in the decision-making process.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估加拿大孕妇及其伴侣对非侵入性产前检测(NIPT)相关信息的偏好。

方法

作为“利用母血进行产前非整倍体筛查的个性化基因组学”(PEGASUS)研究的一部分,对加拿大各地的孕妇及其伴侣进行了调查。

结果

共有882名孕妇和395名伴侣参与。女性更倾向于由医生告知相关信息(77.2%)。她们倾向于提前获取信息,但关于唐氏综合征家庭资源的信息除外,她们更倾向于与检测结果一起获取该信息。超过一半的人认为书面同意很重要(63.7%),并且能够在收到信息当天决定是否进行NIPT(54.9%)。女性更倾向于通过电话(43.7%)或亲自(28%)得知检测结果,但如果根据检测结果被认为唐氏综合征风险较高,她们更倾向于亲自得知结果(76%)。伴侣是被认为意见最为重要的人(62.6%)。伴侣的偏好与之相似,只是伴侣倾向于在更晚的时候(检测时或与结果一起)获取信息,并且觉得健康专业人员对他们意见的重视程度没有那么高。

结论

加拿大女性希望由知识渊博的医生尽早亲自告知她们有关NIPT的信息。伴侣也希望得到告知并参与决策过程。

相似文献

1
Canadian Pregnant Women's Preferences Regarding NIPT for Down Syndrome: The Information They Want, How They Want to Get It, and With Whom They Want to Discuss It.加拿大孕妇对唐氏综合征无创产前检测的偏好:她们想要的信息、获取信息的方式以及希望与之讨论的对象。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019 Jun;41(6):782-791. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.11.003. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
2
The value of non-invasive prenatal testing: preferences of Canadian pregnant women, their partners, and health professionals regarding NIPT use and access.非侵入性产前检测的价值:加拿大孕妇、其伴侣和卫生专业人员对 NIPT 使用和获取的偏好。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Jan 10;19(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2153-y.
3
Facilitating informed choice about non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of women's experiences.促进非侵入性产前检测(NIPT)知情选择:对女性体验的系统评价和定性元分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Jan 14;19(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2168-4.
4
Noninvasive Prenatal Testing: Views of Canadian Pregnant Women and Their Partners Regarding Pressure and Societal Concerns.非侵入性产前检测:加拿大孕妇及其伴侣对压力和社会关注的看法。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2021 Jan-Mar;12(1):53-62. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1829173. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
5
Knowledge and future preference of Chinese women in a major public hospital in Hong Kong after undergoing non-invasive prenatal testing for positive aneuploidy screening: a questionnaire survey.香港一家大型公立医院的中国女性在接受非侵入性产前检测且结果显示非整倍体筛查呈阳性后的知识与未来偏好:一项问卷调查
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Sep 2;15:199. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0636-7.
6
Non-invasive prenatal screening for trisomy 21: what women want and are willing to pay.21三体综合征的无创产前筛查:女性的需求与支付意愿
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Dec;93(3):641-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.08.006. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
7
NIPT-based screening for Down syndrome and beyond: what do pregnant women think?基于无创产前检测(NIPT)的唐氏综合征及其他疾病筛查:孕妇怎么看?
Prenat Diagn. 2015 Jun;35(6):598-604. doi: 10.1002/pd.4579. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
8
Trial by Dutch laboratories for evaluation of non-invasive prenatal testing. Part II-women's perspectives.荷兰实验室对无创产前检测进行评估的试验。第二部分——女性视角。
Prenat Diagn. 2016 Dec;36(12):1091-1098. doi: 10.1002/pd.4941. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
9
What women want: lead considerations for current and future applications of noninvasive prenatal testing in prenatal care.女性想要什么:无创产前检测在产前护理中当前及未来应用的主要考量因素。
Birth. 2014 Sep;41(3):276-82. doi: 10.1111/birt.12113. Epub 2014 May 14.
10
Will the introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down's syndrome undermine informed choice?唐氏综合征无创产前检测的引入会破坏知情选择吗?
Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):1658-71. doi: 10.1111/hex.12159. Epub 2014 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Uptake rates for non-invasive prenatal screening for single-gene disorders associated with advanced paternal age.与父亲高龄相关的单基因疾病无创产前筛查的接受率。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Apr;34(2):e2025. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.2025.
2
Towards a Responsible Implementation of NIPT as a First-Tier Test in Canada: Decision-Makers' Perspectives.在加拿大将无创产前检测(NIPT)作为一线检测进行负责任的实施:决策者的观点
Prenat Diagn. 2025 Apr;45(4):453-463. doi: 10.1002/pd.6753. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
3
Australian Preferences for Prenatal Screening: A Discrete Choice Experiment Comparing Metropolitan and Rural/Regional Areas.
澳大利亚人对产前筛查的偏好:一项比较大都市和农村/地区的离散选择实验。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 May;23(3):493-506. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00938-5. Epub 2025 Jan 17.
4
'Screening should not be based on ability to pay': Australian healthcare providers' and consumers' perspectives on public funding for non-invasive prenatal testing.“筛查不应基于支付能力”:澳大利亚医疗服务提供者和消费者对非侵入性产前检测公共资金的看法。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2025 Jun;65(3):409-419. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13915. Epub 2025 Jan 13.
5
Factors affecting couples' decision making about expanded prenatal cell-free DNA screening.影响夫妻对扩大产前游离DNA筛查决策的因素。
Genet Med Open. 2024;2. doi: 10.1016/j.gimo.2024.101890. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
6
Factors influencing pregnant women's decision to accept or decline prenatal screening and diagnosis - a qualitative study.影响孕妇接受或拒绝产前筛查与诊断决定的因素——一项定性研究
J Community Genet. 2024 Dec;15(6):711-721. doi: 10.1007/s12687-024-00746-3. Epub 2024 Nov 1.
7
The risk of normative bias in reporting empirical research: lessons learned from prenatal screening studies about the prominence of acknowledged limitations.报告实证研究时规范性偏差的风险:从产前筛查研究中了解到的关于公认局限性突出的经验教训。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2023 Dec;44(6):589-606. doi: 10.1007/s11017-023-09639-x. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
8
Women's experiences with non-invasive prenatal testing in Switzerland: a qualitative analysis.瑞士女性对非侵入性产前检测的体验:定性分析。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Oct 23;24(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00964-3.
9
Informed choice of pregnant women regarding noninvasive prenatal testing in Korea: a cross-sectional study.韩国孕妇对无创产前检测的知情选择:一项横断面研究。
Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2022 Sep;28(3):235-249. doi: 10.4069/kjwhn.2022.09.10. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
10
How do women want to receive information about non-invasive prenatal testing? Evidence from a discrete choice experiment.女性希望如何接收关于无创性产前检测的信息?来自离散选择实验的证据。
Prenat Diagn. 2022 Oct;42(11):1377-1389. doi: 10.1002/pd.6243. Epub 2022 Oct 2.