van der Ploeg Frederick, Rezai Armon
1Department of Economics, OxCarre, University of Oxford, Manor Road Building, Oxford, OX1 3UQ UK.
2Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Environ Resour Econ (Dordr). 2019;72(1):77-108. doi: 10.1007/s10640-018-0280-6. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
A simple integrated assessment framework that gives rules for the optimal carbon price, transition to the carbon-free era and stranded carbon assets is presented, which highlights the ethical, economic, geophysical and political drivers of optimal climate policy. For the ethics we discuss the role of intergenerational inequality aversion and the discount rate, where we show the importance of lower discount rates for appraisal of longer run benefit and of policy makers using lower discount rates than private agents. The economics depends on the costs and rates of technical progress in production of fossil fuel, its substitute renewable energies and sequestration. The geophysics depends on the permanent and transient components of atmospheric carbon and the relatively fast temperature response, and we allow for positive feedbacks. The politics stems from international free-rider problems in absence of a global climate deal. We show how results change if different assumptions are made about each of the drivers of climate policy. Our main objective is to offer an easy back-on-the-envelope analysis, which can be used for teaching and communication with policy makers.
本文提出了一个简单的综合评估框架,该框架给出了最优碳价格、向无碳时代过渡以及搁浅碳资产的规则,突出了最优气候政策的伦理、经济、地球物理和政治驱动因素。在伦理方面,我们讨论了代际不平等厌恶和贴现率的作用,在此我们表明较低贴现率对于评估长期收益的重要性,以及政策制定者使用低于私人部门的贴现率的重要性。经济因素取决于化石燃料生产、其替代可再生能源以及碳封存的成本和技术进步速率。地球物理因素取决于大气碳的长期和短期成分以及相对快速的温度响应,并且我们考虑了正反馈。政治因素源于缺乏全球气候协议时的国际搭便车问题。我们展示了如果对气候政策的每个驱动因素做出不同假设,结果会如何变化。我们的主要目标是提供一种简单的粗略分析方法,可用于教学以及与政策制定者沟通。