Sproule David W, Campolettano Eamon T, Rowson Steven
Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Proc Inst Mech Eng P J Sport Eng Technol. 2017 Dec;231(4):317-323. doi: 10.1177/1754337117703019. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
Youth football helmets currently undergo the same impact testing and must satisfy the same criteria as varsity helmets, although youth football players differ from their adult counterparts in anthropometry, physiology, and impact exposure. This study aimed to relate football helmet standards testing to on-field head impact magnitudes for youth and varsity football helmets. Head impact data, filtered to include only impacts to locations in the current National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment standard, were collected for 48 collegiate players (ages 18-23 years) and 25 youth players (ages 9-11 years) using helmet-mounted accelerometer arrays. These on-field data were compared to a series of National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment standard drop tests with a youth and varsity Riddell Speed helmet. In the on-field data, the adult players had a higher frequency of impact than the youth players, and a significant difference in head acceleration magnitude only existed at the top location (p < 0.001). In the laboratory drop tests, the only significant difference between the youth and varsity helmets was at the 3.46 m/s (61 cm) impact to the front location (p = 0.0421). Drop tests generated head accelerations within the top 10% of measured on-field impacts, at all locations and drop heights, demonstrating that drop tests are representative of the most severe head impacts experienced by youth and adult football players on the field. Current standards have been very effective at eliminating skull fracture and severe brain injury in both populations. This analysis suggests that there is not currently a need for a youth-specific drop test standard. However, there may be such a need if helmet testing standards are updated to address concussion, paired with a better understanding of differences in concussion tolerance between youth and adult populations.
目前,青少年橄榄球头盔要接受与大学橄榄球头盔相同的冲击测试,并且必须满足相同的标准,尽管青少年橄榄球运动员在人体测量学、生理学和受冲击情况方面与成年运动员有所不同。本研究旨在将橄榄球头盔标准测试与青少年和大学橄榄球头盔在场上的头部冲击强度联系起来。使用头盔安装的加速度计阵列,收集了48名大学生球员(18 - 23岁)和25名青少年球员(9 - 11岁)的头部冲击数据,这些数据经过筛选,仅包括当前国家运动器材标准操作委员会标准中规定位置的冲击。将这些场上数据与一系列使用青少年和大学Riddell Speed头盔进行的国家运动器材标准操作委员会标准跌落测试进行比较。在场上数据中,成年球员的冲击频率高于青少年球员,并且仅在顶部位置头部加速度大小存在显著差异(p < 0.001)。在实验室跌落测试中,青少年和大学头盔之间唯一的显著差异出现在对前部位置3.46 m/s(61 cm)的冲击时(p = 0.0421)。在所有位置和跌落高度下,跌落测试产生的头部加速度都在测量的场上冲击的前10%以内,这表明跌落测试代表了青少年和成年橄榄球运动员在场上经历的最严重头部冲击。当前标准在消除这两个人群的颅骨骨折和严重脑损伤方面非常有效。该分析表明,目前不需要针对青少年的跌落测试标准。然而,如果头盔测试标准更新以解决脑震荡问题,同时更好地了解青少年和成年人群在脑震荡耐受性方面的差异,可能就会有这样的需求。