• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Inappropriateness of health care in Canada: a systematic review protocol.加拿大医疗保健不当:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2019 Feb 11;8(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-0948-1.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
School-based education programmes for the prevention of unintentional injuries in children and young people.针对儿童和青少年预防意外伤害的校本教育项目。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 27;12(12):CD010246. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010246.pub2.
4
Inappropriate use of clinical practices in Canada: a systematic review.加拿大临床实践的不当使用:系统评价。
CMAJ. 2022 Feb 28;194(8):E279-E296. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.211416.
5
Effectiveness of psychotherapeutic interventions on psychological distress in women who have experienced perinatal loss: a systematic review protocol.针对经历围产期丧失的女性,心理干预对其心理困扰的有效性:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 2;9(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01387-6.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
8
Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.成年人参与促进环境改善和保护活动对健康与福祉的影响:定量和定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 21;2016(5):CD010351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2.
9
Short-term versus long-term psychotherapy for adult psychiatric disorders: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.短期与长期心理治疗成人精神障碍:系统评价与 meta 分析及试验序贯分析的方案。
Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 13;8(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1099-0.
10
Duloxetine versus 'active' placebo, placebo or no intervention for major depressive disorder; a protocol for a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.度洛西汀与“活性”安慰剂、安慰剂或不干预治疗重度抑郁症的比较:一项系统评价随机临床试验的方案,包括荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 9;10(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01722-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Choosing Wisely Canada: scratching the 7-year itch.明智选择加拿大:摆脱七年之痒。
CJEM. 2022 Sep;24(6):569-573. doi: 10.1007/s43678-022-00349-2. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
2
Overuse and underuse of cardiovascular diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for community-dwelling adults: a protocol for a systematic review.社区居住成年人心血管诊断和治疗程序的过度使用与使用不足:一项系统评价方案
HRB Open Res. 2021 Sep 2;4:99. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13330.1. eCollection 2021.
3
Inappropriate use of clinical practices in Canada: a systematic review.加拿大临床实践的不当使用:系统评价。
CMAJ. 2022 Feb 28;194(8):E279-E296. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.211416.
4
The roles, activities and impacts of middle managers who function as knowledge brokers to improve care delivery and outcomes in healthcare organizations: a critical interpretive synthesis.作为知识经纪人在医疗保健组织中改善护理服务提供和结果的中层管理者的角色、活动和影响:批判性综合解读。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 2;22(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07387-z.
5
The Frontline Nurse's Experience of Nursing Outlier Patients.一线护士照顾非主流患者的体验
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 20;17(14):5232. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145232.

本文引用的文献

1
AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both.AMSTAR 2:一种用于系统评价的关键评估工具,该系统评价包括医疗保健干预措施的随机或非随机研究,或两者皆有。
BMJ. 2017 Sep 21;358:j4008. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4008.
2
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.ROBINS-I:一种评估干预性非随机研究偏倚风险的工具。
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919.
3
2016 Update on Medical Overuse: A Systematic Review.《2016年医疗过度使用最新情况:系统评价》
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Nov 1;176(11):1687-1692. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.5381.
4
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
5
A scoping review of appropriateness of care research activity in Canada from a health system-level perspective.从卫生系统层面视角对加拿大医疗适宜性研究活动的范围综述。
Healthc Policy. 2014 May;9(4):48-61.
6
The essential and potentially inappropriate use of antipsychotics across income groups: an analysis of linked administrative data.在不同收入群体中,抗精神病药物的基本且潜在不适当使用:一项关联行政数据的分析。
Can J Psychiatry. 2012 Aug;57(8):488-95. doi: 10.1177/070674371205700807.
7
CareTrack: assessing the appropriateness of health care delivery in Australia.CareTrack:评估澳大利亚医疗服务提供的适宜性。
Med J Aust. 2012 Jul 16;197(2):100-5. doi: 10.5694/mja12.10510.
8
Potentially inappropriate prescribing of benzodiazepines for older adults and risk of falls during a hospital stay: a descriptive study.老年人苯二氮䓬类药物的潜在不适当处方与住院期间跌倒风险:一项描述性研究。
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2009 Jul;62(4):276-83. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v62i4.808.
9
Overuse of health care services in the United States: an understudied problem.美国医疗保健服务的过度使用:一个研究不足的问题。
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Jan 23;172(2):171-8. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.772.
10
To what extent do nurses use research in clinical practice? A systematic review.护士在临床实践中多大程度上使用研究?系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2011 Mar 17;6:21. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-21.

加拿大医疗保健不当:系统评价方案。

Inappropriateness of health care in Canada: a systematic review protocol.

机构信息

Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, P.O. Box 201-B, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6, Canada.

Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2019 Feb 11;8(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-0948-1.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-019-0948-1
PMID:30744703
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6371550/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is increasing recognition in Canada and globally that a substantial proportion of health care delivered is inappropriate as evidenced by (1) harmful and/or ineffective practices being overused, (2) effective clinical practices being underused, and (3) other clinical practices being misused. Inappropriate health care leads to negative patient experiences, poor health outcomes, and inefficient use of scarce health care resources. The purpose of this study is to conduct a systematic review of inappropriate health care in Canada. Our specific objectives are to (1) systematically search and critically review published and grey literature for studies on inappropriate health care in Canada; (2) estimate the nature and magnitude of inappropriate health care in Canada and its provincial and territorial jurisdictions.

METHODS

We will include all quantitative study designs reporting objective or subjective measurements of inappropriate health care in Canada over the last 10 years. We will search the following online databases: MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EconLit, and ISI-Web of Knowledge, which contains Web of Science Core Collection-Citation Indexes, Science Citation Index Expanded, Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science, and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Social Science & Humanities. We will also search grey literature sources to identify provincial and national audits of inappropriate health care. Two authors will independently screen, assess data quality, and extract data for synthesis. Study findings will be synthesized narratively. We will organize our data into three care categorizations: preventive care, acute care, and chronic care. We will provide a compendium of inappropriate health care for each care category for Canada and each Canadian province and territory, where sufficient data exists, by calculating (1) overall medians of underuse, overuse, and misuse of clinical practices and (2) the range of medians of underuse, overuse, and misuse for each clinical practice investigated.

DISCUSSION

This review will result in the first-ever evidence-based compendium of inappropriate health care in Canada. We will also develop detailed reports of inappropriate health care for each Canadian province and territory.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42018093495.

摘要

背景

加拿大和全球范围内越来越认识到,相当一部分提供的医疗保健是不适当的,这表现在以下三个方面:(1)过度使用有害和/或无效的做法,(2)未充分利用有效的临床实践,以及(3)误用其他临床实践。不适当的医疗保健会导致患者体验不佳、健康状况不佳和医疗资源利用效率低下。本研究的目的是对加拿大的不适当医疗保健进行系统审查。我们的具体目标是:(1)系统地搜索和批判性地审查已发表和灰色文献中关于加拿大不适当医疗保健的研究;(2)估计加拿大及其省级和地区不适当医疗保健的性质和程度。

方法

我们将包括所有在过去 10 年中报告加拿大不适当医疗保健的客观或主观测量的定量研究设计。我们将搜索以下在线数据库:MEDLINE、Cochrane 中央对照试验注册中心、EconLit 和 ISI-Web of Knowledge,其中包含 Web of Science 核心集合-引文索引、科学引文索引扩展、会议论文集引文索引-科学和会议论文集引文索引-社会科学与人文。我们还将搜索灰色文献来源,以确定对不适当医疗保健的省级和国家级审计。两位作者将独立筛选、评估数据质量并提取数据进行综合。研究结果将以叙述性方式进行综合。我们将把我们的数据分为三个护理类别:预防保健、急性保健和慢性保健。我们将为加拿大和每个加拿大省和地区提供不适当医疗保健的汇编,在有足够数据的情况下,通过计算(1)临床实践的未使用率、过度使用率和误用率的总体中位数,以及(2)调查的每个临床实践的未使用率、过度使用率和误用率的中位数范围。

讨论

本次审查将产生加拿大有史以来第一份基于证据的不适当医疗保健汇编。我们还将为每个加拿大省和地区编写不适当医疗保健的详细报告。

系统审查注册

PROSPERO CRD42018093495。