Conway Zachary J, Silburn Peter A, Thevathasan Wesley, Maley Karen O', Naughton Geraldine A, Cole Michael H
School of Behavioural and Health Sciences Australian Catholic University Brisbane Queensland Australia.
Asia-Pacific Centre for Neuromodulation, Queensland Brain Institute The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia.
Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2018 Nov 8;6(1):17-26. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12681. eCollection 2019 Jan.
The use of alternate frequencies, amplitudes, and pulse widths to manage motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) is of clinical interest, but currently lacks systematic evidence.
OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: Systematically review whether alternate STN-DBS settings influence the therapy's efficacy for managing PD motor symptoms.
Systematic searches identified studies that; involved bilateral STN-DBS PD patients; manipulated ≥ 1 STN-DBS parameter (e.g., amplitude); assessed ≥ 1 motor symptom (e.g., tremor); and contrasted the experimental and chronic stimulation settings. A Mantel-Haenszel random-effects meta-analysis compared the UPDRS-III sub-scores at low (60-Hz) and high frequencies ( ≥ 130 Hz). Inter-study heterogeneity was assessed with the Cohen's χ and I index, while the standard GRADE evidence assessment examined strength of evidence.
Of the 21 included studies, 17 investigated the effect of alternate stimulation frequencies, five examined alternate stimulation amplitudes, and two studied changes in pulse width. Given the available data, meta-analyses were only possible for alternate stimulation frequencies. Analysis of the heterogeneity amongst the included studies indicated significant variability between studies and, on the basis of the GRADE framework, the pooled evidence from the meta-analysis studies was of very low quality due to the significant risks of bias.
The meta-analysis reported a very low quality of evidence for the efficacy of low-frequency STN-DBS for managing PD motor symptoms. Furthermore, it highlighted that lower amplitudes lead to the re-emergence of motor symptoms and further research is needed to understand the potential benefits of alternate STN-DBS parameters for PD patients.
采用交替频率、幅度和脉宽来管理接受丘脑底核深部脑刺激(STN-DBS)的帕金森病(PD)患者的运动症状具有临床意义,但目前缺乏系统性证据。
目的/假设:系统评价交替的STN-DBS设置是否会影响该疗法管理PD运动症状的疗效。
系统检索确定了符合以下条件的研究:纳入双侧STN-DBS的PD患者;操控≥1个STN-DBS参数(如幅度);评估≥1项运动症状(如震颤);并对比实验性和慢性刺激设置。采用Mantel-Haenszel随机效应荟萃分析比较低频(60Hz)和高频(≥130Hz)时的统一帕金森病评定量表第三部分(UPDRS-III)子评分。采用Cohen's χ和I指数评估研究间的异质性,同时采用标准的GRADE证据评估来检验证据强度。
在纳入的21项研究中,17项研究了交替刺激频率的影响,5项研究了交替刺激幅度,2项研究了脉宽变化。鉴于现有数据,仅能对交替刺激频率进行荟萃分析。对纳入研究的异质性分析表明,各研究间存在显著差异,并且基于GRADE框架,由于存在显著的偏倚风险,荟萃分析研究的汇总证据质量极低。
荟萃分析报告称,低频STN-DBS治疗PD运动症状疗效的证据质量极低。此外,该分析还强调,较低幅度会导致运动症状再次出现,需要进一步研究以了解交替的STN-DBS参数对PD患者的潜在益处。