• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康检查后收入水平与医生就诊频次不规律的相关性,及其对员工血糖控制的后续影响:一项回顾性倾向评分匹配队列研究。

Association between income levels and irregular physician visits after a health checkup, and its consequent effect on glycemic control among employees: A retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Research Planning and Information Management, Fukuoka Institute of Health and Environmental Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan.

Department of Health Care Administration and Management, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

出版信息

J Diabetes Investig. 2019 Sep;10(5):1372-1381. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13025. Epub 2019 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1111/jdi.13025
PMID:30758145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6717811/
Abstract

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of income levels on physician visit patterns and to quantify the consequent impact of irregular physician visits on glycemic control among employees' health insurance beneficiaries in Japan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We obtained specific health checkup data of untreated diabetes patients from the Fukuoka branch of the Japanese Health Insurance Association. We selected 2,981 insurance beneficiaries and classified 650 and 2,331 patients into, respectively, the regular visit and irregular visit group. We implemented propensity score matching to select an adequate control group.

RESULTS

Compared with those with a standard monthly income <$2,000 (US$1 = ¥100), those with a higher monthly income were less likely to have irregular visits; $2,000-2,999: odds ratio 0.74 (95% confidence interval 0.56-0.98), $3,000-3,999: odds ratio 0.63 (95% confidence interval 0.46-0.87) and ≥$5,000: odds ratio 0.58 (95% confidence interval 0.39-0.86). After propensity score matching and adjusting for covariates, the irregular visit group tended to have poor glycemic control; increased glycated hemoglobin ≥0.5: odds ratio 1.90 (95% confidence interval 1.30-2.77), ≥1.0: odds ratio 2.75 (95% confidence interval 1.56-4.82) and ≥20% relatively: odds ratio 3.18 (95% confidence interval 1.46-6.92).

CONCLUSIONS

We clarified that there was a significant relationship between income and irregular visits, and this consequently resulted in poor glycemic control. These findings would be useful for more effective disease management.

摘要

目的/引言:本研究旨在评估收入水平对医生就诊模式的影响,并量化日本员工健康保险受益人不规则就诊对血糖控制的影响。

材料和方法

我们从日本健康保险协会福冈分部获得了未经治疗的糖尿病患者的特定健康检查数据。我们选择了 2981 名保险受益人,并将 650 名和 2331 名患者分别归入定期就诊组和不定期就诊组。我们实施倾向评分匹配以选择合适的对照组。

结果

与标准月收入<2000 美元(1 美元=100 日元)的患者相比,月收入较高的患者不规则就诊的可能性较低;2000-2999 美元:比值比 0.74(95%置信区间 0.56-0.98),3000-3999 美元:比值比 0.63(95%置信区间 0.46-0.87)和≥5000 美元:比值比 0.58(95%置信区间 0.39-0.86)。经过倾向评分匹配和调整协变量后,不规则就诊组的血糖控制较差;糖化血红蛋白增加≥0.5:比值比 1.90(95%置信区间 1.30-2.77),≥1.0:比值比 2.75(95%置信区间 1.56-4.82)和相对增加≥20%:比值比 3.18(95%置信区间 1.46-6.92)。

结论

我们发现收入与不规则就诊之间存在显著关系,这导致血糖控制不佳。这些发现对于更有效的疾病管理将是有用的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a06/6717811/85440f087c45/JDI-10-1372-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a06/6717811/f3edda64e1bb/JDI-10-1372-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a06/6717811/85440f087c45/JDI-10-1372-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a06/6717811/f3edda64e1bb/JDI-10-1372-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a06/6717811/85440f087c45/JDI-10-1372-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Association between income levels and irregular physician visits after a health checkup, and its consequent effect on glycemic control among employees: A retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.健康检查后收入水平与医生就诊频次不规律的相关性,及其对员工血糖控制的后续影响:一项回顾性倾向评分匹配队列研究。
J Diabetes Investig. 2019 Sep;10(5):1372-1381. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13025. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
2
Effectiveness of monthly and bimonthly follow-up of patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes: a propensity score matched cohort study.每月和每两个月随访血糖控制良好的 2 型糖尿病患者的效果:一项倾向评分匹配队列研究。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2019 May 2;19(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12902-019-0372-5.
3
Association between nutritional guidance or ophthalmological examination and discontinuation of physician visits in patients with newly diagnosed diabetes: A retrospective cohort study using a nationwide database.新诊断糖尿病患者接受营养指导或眼科检查与减少就诊次数的关联性:一项使用全国性数据库的回顾性队列研究。
J Diabetes Investig. 2021 Sep;12(9):1619-1631. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13510. Epub 2021 Feb 28.
4
Association of Real-time Continuous Glucose Monitoring With Glycemic Control and Acute Metabolic Events Among Patients With Insulin-Treated Diabetes.实时连续血糖监测与接受胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者的血糖控制和急性代谢事件的关联。
JAMA. 2021 Jun 8;325(22):2273-2284. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.6530.
5
Comparison of patient visits to emergency departments, physician offices, and dental offices for dental problems and injuries.比较患者因牙科问题和损伤前往急诊部、医生办公室和牙科诊所就诊的情况。
J Public Health Dent. 2011 Winter;71(1):13-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2010.00195.x.
6
Effect of Flash Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control, Hypoglycemia, Diabetes-Related Distress, and Resource Utilization in the Association of British Clinical Diabetologists (ABCD) Nationwide Audit.闪光血糖监测对英国临床糖尿病学会(ABCD)全国审计中血糖控制、低血糖、与糖尿病相关的痛苦和资源利用的影响。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Sep;43(9):2153-2160. doi: 10.2337/dc20-0738. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
7
Determinants of poor glycemic control among adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Jimma University Medical Center, Jimma zone, south west Ethiopia: a case control study.埃塞俄比亚西南部 Jimma 地区 Jimma 大学医学中心的 2 型糖尿病成年患者血糖控制不佳的决定因素:一项病例对照研究。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2019 Aug 29;19(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12902-019-0421-0.
8
Characteristics of Office-based Physician Visits, 2014.2014年门诊医生诊疗特点
NCHS Data Brief. 2017 Dec(292):1-8.
9
Variation in Physician Office Visit Rates by Patient Characteristics and State, 2012.2012年按患者特征和州划分的医师门诊率差异
NCHS Data Brief. 2015 Sep(212):1-8.
10
Impact of age at menarche on obesity and glycemic control in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: Fukuoka Diabetes Registry.初潮年龄对日本 2 型糖尿病患者肥胖和血糖控制的影响:福冈糖尿病登记研究。
J Diabetes Investig. 2018 Sep;9(5):1216-1223. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12839. Epub 2018 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Conundrum and chances of diabetes management in the Western Pacific Region: A narrative review.西太平洋地区糖尿病管理的难题与机遇:一篇叙述性综述
J Diabetes Investig. 2025 Aug;16(8):1357-1366. doi: 10.1111/jdi.70053. Epub 2025 May 15.
2
Non-Linear Dose-Response Relationship for Metformin in Japanese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Analysis of Irregular Longitudinal Data by Interpretable Machine Learning Models.二甲双胍在日本2型糖尿病患者中的非线性剂量反应关系:通过可解释机器学习模型分析不规则纵向数据
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2025 Feb;13(1):e70055. doi: 10.1002/prp2.70055.
3
Associations between income/employment status and diabetes care processes, health behaviors, and health outcomes in Japan: A cross-sectional study using claims data linked to a questionnaire survey.

本文引用的文献

1
IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045.国际糖尿病联盟(IDF)糖尿病地图集:2017 年全球糖尿病患病率估计数和 2045 年预测值。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Apr;138:271-281. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.02.023. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
2
2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: .2. 糖尿病的分类和诊断: 。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(Suppl 1):S13-S27. doi: 10.2337/dc18-S002.
3
Socio-economic status and physicians' treatment decisions.社会经济地位与医生的治疗决策。
日本利用索赔数据与问卷调查相链接的横剖研究:收入/就业状况与糖尿病护理过程、健康行为和健康结果之间的关联。
J Diabetes Investig. 2024 Nov;15(11):1684-1695. doi: 10.1111/jdi.14301. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
4
Impact of income and eating speed on new-onset diabetes among men: a retrospective cohort study.收入和进食速度对男性新发糖尿病的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 21;11(10):e048855. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048855.
5
Blood glucose control: Where are we?血糖控制:我们现在处于什么阶段?
J Diabetes Investig. 2021 Oct;12(10):1762-1764. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13632. Epub 2021 Sep 5.
6
Health Inequalities Among Elderly Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients in Japan.日本老年 2 型糖尿病患者的健康不平等。
Popul Health Manag. 2020 Jun;23(3):264-270. doi: 10.1089/pop.2019.0141. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
Health Econ. 2018 Mar;27(3):e77-e89. doi: 10.1002/hec.3621. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
4
Measuring socioeconomic inequalities in eye care services among patients with diabetes in Alberta, Canada, 1995-2009.测量加拿大艾伯塔省糖尿病患者在眼科保健服务方面的社会经济不平等,1995-2009 年。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 May;127:205-211. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.02.024. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
5
Impact of nonadherence on complication risks and healthcare costs in patients newly-diagnosed with diabetes.未坚持治疗对新诊断糖尿病患者并发症风险及医疗费用的影响。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Jan;123:55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.11.007. Epub 2016 Nov 19.
6
Impact on short-term glycaemic control of initiating diabetes care versus leaving diabetes untreated among individuals with newly screening-detected diabetes in Japan.在日本,新筛查发现的糖尿病患者中,开始糖尿病护理与不治疗糖尿病相比,对短期血糖控制的影响。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014 Dec;68(12):1189-95. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-204054. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
7
Report of the committee on the classification and diagnostic criteria of diabetes mellitus.糖尿病分类和诊断标准委员会报告。
J Diabetes Investig. 2010 Oct 19;1(5):212-28. doi: 10.1111/j.2040-1124.2010.00074.x.
8
Methods for constructing and assessing propensity scores.构建和评估倾向得分的方法。
Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct;49(5):1701-20. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12182. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
9
Poverty increases type 2 diabetes incidence and inequality of care despite universal health coverage.尽管实现了全民健康覆盖,贫困仍会增加 2 型糖尿病的发病率和医疗服务不平等。
Diabetes Care. 2012 Nov;35(11):2286-92. doi: 10.2337/dc11-2052. Epub 2012 Aug 21.
10
Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies.在观察性研究中估计均值差异和比例差异时,倾向得分匹配的最佳卡尺宽度。
Pharm Stat. 2011 Mar-Apr;10(2):150-61. doi: 10.1002/pst.433.