Chapman Ryan M, Torchia Michael T, Bell John-Erik, Van Citters Douglas W
Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, 14 Engineering Drive, Hanover, NH 03755 e-mail: .
Department of Orthopaedics, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH 03766.
J Biomech Eng. 2019 Apr 1;141(4):0410011-7. doi: 10.1115/1.4042433.
Current shoulder clinical range of motion (ROM) assessments (e.g., goniometric ROM) may not adequately represent shoulder function beyond controlled clinical settings. Relative inertial measurement unit (IMU) motion quantifies ROM precisely and can be used outside of clinic settings capturing "real-world" shoulder function. A novel IMU-based shoulder elevation quantification method was developed via IMUs affixed to the sternum/humerus, respectively. This system was then compared to in-laboratory motion capture (MOCAP) during prescribed motions (flexion, abduction, scaption, and internal/external rotation). MOCAP/IMU elevation were equivalent during flexion (R2 = 0.96, μError = 1.7 deg), abduction (R2 = 0.96, μError = 2.9 deg), scaption (R2 = 0.98, μError = -0.3 deg), and internal/external rotation (R2 = 0.90, μError = 0.4 deg). When combined across movements, MOCAP/IMU elevation were equal (R2 = 0.98, μError = 1.4 deg). Following validation, the IMU-based system was deployed prospectively capturing continuous shoulder elevation in 10 healthy individuals (4 M, 69 ± 20 years) without shoulder pathology for seven consecutive days (13.5 ± 2.9 h/day). Elevation was calculated continuously daily and outcome metrics included percent spent in discrete ROM (e.g., 0-5 deg and 5-10 deg), repeated maximum elevation (i.e., >10 occurrences), and maximum/average elevation. Average elevation was 40 ± 6 deg. Maximum with >10 occurrences and maximum were on average 145-150 deg and 169 ± 8 deg, respectively. Subjects spent the vast majority of the day (97%) below 90 deg of elevation, with the most time spent in the 25-30 deg range (9.7%). This study demonstrates that individuals have the ability to achieve large ROMs but do not frequently do so. These results are consistent with the previously established lab-based measures. Moreover, they further inform how healthy individuals utilize their shoulders and may provide clinicians a reference for postsurgical ROM.
当前肩部临床活动范围(ROM)评估(如角度测量ROM)可能无法充分代表在可控临床环境之外的肩部功能。相对惯性测量单元(IMU)运动可精确量化ROM,并且可在临床环境之外使用,以捕捉“现实世界”中的肩部功能。通过分别将IMU固定在胸骨/肱骨上,开发了一种基于IMU的新型肩部抬高量化方法。然后将该系统与规定动作(前屈、外展、侧方上举以及内旋/外旋)期间的实验室运动捕捉(MOCAP)进行比较。在屈曲(R2 = 0.96,平均误差 = 1.7°)、外展(R2 = 0.96,平均误差 = 2.9°)、侧方上举(R2 = 0.98,平均误差 = -0.3°)以及内旋/外旋(R2 = 0.90,平均误差 = 0.4°)过程中,MOCAP/IMU抬高结果相当。当综合各个动作时,MOCAP/IMU抬高结果相等(R2 = 0.98,平均误差 = 1.4°)。经过验证后,基于IMU的系统被前瞻性地应用于10名无肩部病变的健康个体(4名男性,69±20岁),连续七天记录其肩部持续抬高情况(每天13.5±2.9小时)。每天持续计算抬高情况,结果指标包括在离散ROM(如0 - 5°和5 - 10°)中花费的百分比、重复最大抬高(即>10次出现)以及最大/平均抬高。平均抬高为40±6°。出现次数>10次的最大抬高和最大抬高平均分别为145 - 150°和169±8°。受试者一天中绝大多数时间(97%)的肩部抬高低于90°,其中在25 - 30°范围内花费的时间最多(9.7%)。本研究表明个体有能力实现较大的ROM,但并不经常这样做。这些结果与先前基于实验室的测量结果一致。此外,它们进一步说明了健康个体如何使用肩部,并且可能为临床医生提供术后ROM的参考。