Suppr超能文献

奖赏回路的分离成分参与评价与选择。

Dissociable components of the reward circuit are involved in appraisal versus choice.

机构信息

Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

School of Global Policy and Strategy, Rady School of Management, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 13;9(1):1958. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38927-7.

Abstract

People can evaluate a set of options as a whole, or they can approach those same options with the purpose of making a choice between them. A common network has been implicated across these two types of evaluations, including regions of ventromedial prefrontal cortex and the posterior midline. We test the hypothesis that sub-components of this reward circuit are differentially involved in triggering more automatic appraisal of one's options (Dorsal Value Network) versus explicitly comparing between those options (Ventral Value Network). Participants undergoing fMRI were instructed to appraise how much they liked a set of products (Like) or to choose the product they most preferred (Choose). Activity in the Dorsal Value Network consistently tracked set liking, across both task-relevant (Like) and task-irrelevant (Choose) trials. In contrast, the Ventral Value Network was particularly sensitive to evaluation condition (more active during Choose than Like trials). Within vmPFC, anatomically distinct regions were dissociated in their sensitivity to choice (ventrally, in medial OFC) versus appraisal (dorsally, in pregenual ACC). Dorsal regions additionally tracked decision certainty across both types of evaluation. These findings suggest that separable mechanisms drive decisions about how good one's options are versus decisions about which option is best.

摘要

人们可以整体评估一组选项,也可以有目的地选择其中的一些选项进行比较。这两种评估方式都涉及到一个共同的网络,包括腹内侧前额叶皮层和后中线的区域。我们假设这个奖励回路的子成分在触发对一个人选项的更自动评估(背侧价值网络)与明确比较这些选项(腹侧价值网络)方面有不同的作用。参与者在进行 fMRI 时被指示评估他们对一组产品的喜爱程度(喜欢)或选择他们最偏好的产品(选择)。背侧价值网络的活动在两个任务相关(喜欢)和任务无关(选择)的试验中都一致地追踪了集合的喜好。相比之下,腹侧价值网络对评估条件特别敏感(在选择试验中比喜欢试验更活跃)。在 vmPFC 中,解剖上不同的区域在对选择(腹侧,在中眶额皮质)和评估(背侧,在前扣带皮质)的敏感性方面存在差异。背侧区域还在两种评估类型中追踪决策的确定性。这些发现表明,可分离的机制驱动了关于一个人的选项有多好的决策,以及关于哪个选项是最好的决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/777a/6374444/6e052ed84143/41598_2019_38927_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验