Chen Wen-Li, Ye Qian, Zhang Si-Cong, Xia Yang, Yang Xi, Yuan Ti-Fei, Shan Chun-Lei, Li Jian-An
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhangjiagang Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Zhangjiagang, Jiangsu Province, China.
School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Nanjing Normal University of Special Education, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.
Neural Regen Res. 2019 Jun;14(6):1004-1012. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.250580.
When watching someone performs an action, mirror neurons are activated in a way that is very similar to the activation that occurs when actually performing that action. Previous single-sample case studies indicate that hand-action observation training may lead to activation and remodeling of mirror neuron systems, which include important language centers, and may improve language function in aphasia patients. In this randomized-block-design experiment, we recruited 24 aphasia patients from, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, China. The patients were divided into three groups where they underwent hand-action observation and repetition, dynamic-object observation and repetition, or conventional speech therapy. Training took place 5 days per week, 35 minutes per day, for 2 weeks. We assessed language function via picture naming tests for objects and actions and the Western Aphasia Battery. Among the participants, one patient, his wife and four healthy student volunteers underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging to analyze changes in brain activation during hand-action observation and dynamic-object observation. Results demonstrated that, compared with dynamic-object observation, hand-action observation led to greater performance with respect to the aphasia quotient and affiliated naming sub-tests and a greater Western Aphasia Battery test score. The overall effect was similar to that of conventional aphasia training, yet hand-action observation had advantages compared with conventional training in terms of vocabulary extraction and spontaneous speech. Thus, hand-action observation appears to more strongly activate the mirror neuron system compared with dynamic-object observation. The activated areas included Broca's area, Wernicke's area, and the supramarginal gyrus. These results suggest that hand-action observation combined with repetition might better improve language function in aphasia patients compared with dynamic-object observation combined with repetition. The therapeutic mechanism of this intervention may be associated with activation of additional mirror neuron systems, and may have implications for the possible repair and remodeling of damaged nerve networks. The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee of Nanjing Medical University, China (approval number: 2011-SRFA-086) on March 11, 2011. This trial has been registered in the ISRCTN Registry (ISRCTN84827527).
当观察某人执行某个动作时,镜像神经元的激活方式与实际执行该动作时的激活方式非常相似。先前的单样本案例研究表明,手部动作观察训练可能会导致镜像神经元系统的激活和重塑,该系统包括重要的语言中枢,并可能改善失语症患者的语言功能。在这项随机区组设计实验中,我们从中国东南大学附属中大医院招募了24名失语症患者。患者被分为三组,分别接受手部动作观察与重复、动态物体观察与重复或传统言语治疗。训练每周进行5天,每天35分钟,共2周。我们通过物体和动作的图片命名测试以及西方失语症成套测验来评估语言功能。在参与者中,一名患者、其妻子和四名健康学生志愿者接受了功能磁共振成像,以分析手部动作观察和动态物体观察期间大脑激活的变化。结果表明,与动态物体观察相比,手部动作观察在失语商数和相关命名子测试方面表现更佳,西方失语症成套测验得分更高。总体效果与传统失语症训练相似,但手部动作观察在词汇提取和自发言语方面比传统训练更具优势。因此,与动态物体观察相比,手部动作观察似乎能更强烈地激活镜像神经元系统。激活区域包括布洛卡区、韦尼克区和缘上回。这些结果表明,与动态物体观察结合重复相比,手部动作观察结合重复可能能更好地改善失语症患者的语言功能。这种干预的治疗机制可能与额外镜像神经元系统的激活有关,可能对受损神经网络的修复和重塑具有启示意义。该研究方案于2011年3月11日获得中国南京医科大学伦理委员会批准(批准号:2011-SRFA-086)。本试验已在国际标准随机对照试验编号注册库(ISRCTN84827527)注册。