• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中短期双工位坐/站式工作站对健康人从事久坐工作时认知表现和工作负荷的影响:一项随机对照试验的二次分析。

Medium-term effects of a two-desk sit/stand workstation on cognitive performance and workload for healthy people performing sedentary work: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

a Institute of Sport Science , University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria.

b Department of Research and Development , University of Applied Sciences for Health Professions Upper Austria , Linz , Austria.

出版信息

Ergonomics. 2019 Jun;62(6):794-810. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2019.1577497. Epub 2019 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1080/00140139.2019.1577497
PMID:30762479
Abstract

Implementing sit/stand workstations in sedentary work environments is a common way to reduce sedentary time, but their medium-term effect on cognitive performance is unclear. To address this circumstance, eighteen office workers participated in a two-arm, randomised controlled cross-over trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02825303), either working at a traditional (sit) or an interventional (sit/stand) workplace for 23 weeks. Cognitive performance (working speed, reaction time, concentration performance, accuracy), workload and relevant covariates (salivary cortisol level, heart rate, physical activity, sitting time) were measured pre- and post-intervention under laboratory conditions. MANOVA and RMANOVA results did not show differences in performance parameters and workload, respectively, between sit/stand and traditional workplace users. Differences in text editing accuracy and cortisol levels for sit/stand workstation users indicate potential connectivity to cognitive parameters which should be further examined with large-scale studies. Medium-term effects of working at sit/stand workstations on cognitive performance and workload are unexplored. This randomised controlled trial suggests that cognitive performance and workload are unaffected for sit/stand workstation users after 23 weeks of use. However, accuracy appeared to improve and physiological stress appeared to be altered. : BMI: body mass index; IPAQ: International physical activity questionnaire; MET: metabolic equivalent of task; MANOVA: multivariate ANOVA; NASA TLX: NASA task load index; RMANOVA: repeated measures ANOVA.

摘要

在久坐的工作环境中实施坐站交替工作站是减少久坐时间的常用方法,但它们对认知表现的中期影响尚不清楚。为了解决这一情况,18 名办公室工作人员参加了一项双臂、随机对照交叉试验(ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02825303),他们要么在传统(坐)工作场所,要么在干预(坐/站)工作场所工作 23 周。在实验室条件下,分别在干预前后测量认知表现(工作速度、反应时间、集中力表现、准确性)、工作量和相关协变量(唾液皮质醇水平、心率、身体活动、坐姿时间)。MANOVA 和 RMANOVA 的结果表明,在表现参数和工作量方面,坐/站和传统工作场所使用者之间没有差异。对于坐站工作站使用者,文本编辑准确性和皮质醇水平的差异表明与认知参数存在潜在联系,应进一步通过大规模研究进行检查。坐站工作站对认知表现和工作量的中期影响尚未探索。这项随机对照试验表明,在使用 23 周后,坐站工作站使用者的认知表现和工作量不受影响。然而,准确性似乎有所提高,生理压力似乎也发生了变化。:BMI:体重指数;国际体力活动问卷(IPAQ);MET:任务代谢当量;MANOVA:多元方差分析;美国宇航局任务负荷指数(NASA TLX);RMANOVA:重复测量方差分析。

相似文献

1
Medium-term effects of a two-desk sit/stand workstation on cognitive performance and workload for healthy people performing sedentary work: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.中短期双工位坐/站式工作站对健康人从事久坐工作时认知表现和工作负荷的影响:一项随机对照试验的二次分析。
Ergonomics. 2019 Jun;62(6):794-810. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2019.1577497. Epub 2019 Apr 7.
2
Effect of a novel two-desk sit-to-stand workplace (ACTIVE OFFICE) on sitting time, performance and physiological parameters: protocol for a randomized control trial.新型双桌式坐站两用工作场所(ACTIVE OFFICE)对久坐时间、工作表现和生理参数的影响:一项随机对照试验方案
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jul 15;16:578. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3271-y.
3
Effect of alternating postures on cognitive performance for healthy people performing sedentary work.交替姿势对从事久坐工作的健康人群认知表现的影响。
Ergonomics. 2018 Jun;61(6):778-795. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2017.1417642. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
4
Evaluation of sit-stand workstations in an office setting: a randomised controlled trial.办公室环境中坐立两用工作站的评估:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Nov 19;15:1145. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2469-8.
5
Desk-based workers' perspectives on using sit-stand workstations: a qualitative analysis of the Stand@Work study.坐姿工作者使用坐立交替工作站的观点:Stand@Work 研究的定性分析。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jul 25;14:752. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-752.
6
Long-Term Access to Sit-Stand Workstations in a Large Office Population: User Profiles Reveal Differences in Sitting Time and Perceptions.长期使用坐立工作站对大型办公人群的影响:用户特征揭示了坐姿时间和感受的差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 15;15(9):2019. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15092019.
7
The effect of a sit-stand workstation intervention on daily sitting, standing and physical activity: protocol for a 12 month workplace randomised control trial.坐站式工作站干预对日常坐姿、站姿和身体活动的影响:一项为期12个月的工作场所随机对照试验方案
BMC Public Health. 2015 Feb 15;15:152. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1506-y.
8
The effectiveness of sit-stand workstations for changing office workers' sitting time: results from the Stand@Work randomized controlled trial pilot.坐站两用工作站对改变办公室职员久坐时间的有效性:“站立工作”随机对照试验试点的结果
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 Oct 8;11:127. doi: 10.1186/s12966-014-0127-7.
9
Computer-based Prompt's impact on postural variability and sit-stand desk usage behavior; a cluster randomized control trial.基于计算机的提示对姿势变异性和坐立办公桌使用行为的影响:一项聚类随机对照试验。
Appl Ergon. 2019 Sep;79:17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
10
Using Sit-to-Stand Workstations in Offices: Is There a Compensation Effect?在办公室使用坐站两用工作站:是否存在补偿效应?
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Apr;48(4):720-5. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000802.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Ergonomic Intervention on Cognitive Function of Office Workers.工效学干预对办公室职员认知功能的影响
Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2024 Oct-Dec;28(4):267-271. doi: 10.4103/ijoem.ijoem_213_22. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
2
Exploring Associations Between Device-Based Occupational Sedentary Behavior and Need for Recovery in White Collar Workers: A Compositional Data-Analysis.基于设备的职业久坐行为与白领恢复需求之间的关联研究:一种组合数据分析。
Int J Public Health. 2024 Jul 29;69:1607322. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1607322. eCollection 2024.
3
The effectiveness of a 6-month intervention with sit-stand workstation in office workers: Results from the SUFHA cluster randomized controlled trial.
一项为期 6 个月的使用坐站式工作站干预办公人员的效果:来自 SUFHA 群组随机对照试验的结果。
Work. 2024;79(2):879-890. doi: 10.3233/WOR-230624.
4
Exploratory study of the acute and mid-term effects of using a novel dynamic meeting environment (Aeris) on cognitive performance and neurophysiological responses.关于使用新型动态会议环境(Aeris)对认知表现和神经生理反应的急性和中期影响的探索性研究。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Nov 23;17:1282728. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1282728. eCollection 2023.
5
Physical activity on executive function in sedentary individuals: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.体力活动对久坐个体执行功能的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 7;18(12):e0294251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294251. eCollection 2023.
6
Providing office workers with height-adjustable workstation to reduce and interrupt workplace sitting time: protocol for the Stand Up for Healthy Aging (SUFHA) cluster randomized controlled trial.为办公室工作人员提供可调节高度的工作站以减少和打断工作场所久坐时间:站立促进健康老龄化(SUFHA)整群随机对照试验方案。
Trials. 2023 Jun 6;24(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07407-9.
7
Does breaking up sitting in office-based settings result in cognitive performance improvements which last throughout the day? A review of the evidence.在办公室环境中打破久坐状态是否会带来能持续一整天的认知能力提升?证据综述。
Ind Health. 2022 Dec 1;60(6):501-513. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2021-0174. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
8
Does breaking up prolonged sitting improve cognitive functions in sedentary adults? A mapping review and hypothesis formulation on the potential physiological mechanisms.打破长时间久坐是否能改善久坐成年人的认知功能?关于潜在生理机制的图谱综述与假设形成。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Mar 12;22(1):274. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04136-5.
9
It is Time to Have Rest: How do Break Types Affect Muscular Activity and Perceived Discomfort During Prolonged Sitting Work.是时候休息了:休息类型如何影响长时间坐着工作期间的肌肉活动和感知到的不适。
Saf Health Work. 2020 Jun;11(2):207-214. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.008. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
10
The effectiveness and complexity of interventions targeting sedentary behaviour across the lifespan: a systematic review and meta-analysis.针对整个生命周期久坐行为的干预措施的有效性和复杂性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Apr 25;17(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00957-0.