Willemen Erik, Schreurs Rick, Huntjens Peter R, Strik Marc, Plank Gernot, Vigmond Edward, Walmsley John, Vernooy Kevin, Delhaas Tammo, Prinzen Frits W, Lumens Joost
Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
IHU-LIRYC Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Pessac, France.
Front Physiol. 2019 Feb 1;10:17. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00017. eCollection 2019.
Timing of atrial, right (RV), and left ventricular (LV) stimulation in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is known to affect electrical activation and pump function of the LV. In this study, we used computer simulations, with input from animal experiments, to investigate the effect of varying pacing delays on both LV and RV electrical dyssynchrony and contractile function. A pacing protocol was performed in dogs with atrioventricular block ( = 6), using 100 different combinations of atrial (A)-LV and A-RV pacing delays. Regional LV and RV electrical activation times were measured using 112 electrodes and LV and RV pressures were measured with catheter-tip micromanometers. Contractile response to a pacing delay was defined as relative change of the maximum rate of LV and RV pressure rise (dP/dt) compared to RV pacing with an A-RV delay of 125 ms. The pacing protocol was simulated in the CircAdapt model of cardiovascular system dynamics, using the experimentally acquired electrical mapping data as input. Ventricular electrical activation changed with changes in the amount of LV or RV pre-excitation. The resulting changes in dP/dt differed markedly between the LV and RV. Pacing the LV 10-50 ms before the RV led to the largest increases in LV dP/dt. In contrast, RV dP/dt was highest with RV pre-excitation and decreased up to 33% with LV pre-excitation. These opposite patterns of changes in RV and LV dP/dt were reproduced by the simulations. The simulations extended these observations by showing that changes in steady-state biventricular cardiac output differed from changes in both LV and RV dP/dt. The model allowed to explain the discrepant changes in dP/dt and cardiac output by coupling between atria and ventricles as well as between the ventricles. The LV and the RV respond in a opposite manner to variation in the amount of LV or RV pre-excitation. Computer simulations capture LV and RV behavior during pacing delay variation and may be used in the design of new CRT optimization studies.
已知心脏再同步治疗(CRT)中,心房、右心室(RV)和左心室(LV)刺激的时机可影响左心室的电激活和泵功能。在本研究中,我们利用动物实验的输入数据进行计算机模拟,以研究不同起搏延迟对左心室和右心室电不同步及收缩功能的影响。对6只患有房室传导阻滞的犬执行了起搏方案,使用了100种不同的心房(A)-左心室和A-右心室起搏延迟组合。使用112个电极测量左心室和右心室局部电激活时间,并用导管尖端微测压计测量左心室和右心室压力。将起搏延迟的收缩反应定义为与A-右心室延迟为125 ms的右心室起搏相比,左心室和右心室压力上升最大速率(dP/dt)的相对变化。使用实验获取的电标测数据作为输入,在心血管系统动力学的CircAdapt模型中模拟起搏方案。心室电激活随左心室或右心室预激量的变化而改变。左心室和右心室的dP/dt变化结果明显不同。在右心室之前10 - 50 ms对左心室进行起搏导致左心室dP/dt最大增加。相比之下,右心室预激时右心室dP/dt最高,左心室预激时右心室dP/dt降低高达33%。模拟重现了右心室和左心室dP/dt的这些相反变化模式。模拟扩展了这些观察结果,表明双心室稳态心输出量的变化不同于左心室和右心室dP/dt的变化。该模型能够通过心房与心室之间以及心室之间的耦合来解释dP/dt和心输出量的差异变化。左心室和右心室对左心室或右心室预激量变化的反应相反。计算机模拟捕捉了起搏延迟变化期间左心室和右心室的行为,可用于设计新的CRT优化研究。