Budzyński Jacek, Tojek Krzysztof, Wustrau Beata, Czerniak Beata, Winiarski Piotr, Korzycka-Wilińska Wanda, Banaszkiewicz Zbigniew
Department of Vascular and Internal Diseases, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland.
Department of General, Gastrointestinal, Colorectal and Oncological Surgery, Chair of Vascular Surgery and Angiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland.
Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis. 2018 Mar 27;3:e46-e57. doi: 10.5114/amsad.2018.74736. eCollection 2018.
There is evidence of positive relationships between cholesterol concentration and risk of cardiovascular diseases. However, higher mortality in patients with a low cholesterol level has been reported (the "cholesterol paradox").
Medical records of 34 191 inpatients between 2014 and 2016 were reviewed and the relationships between total (TC), low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C) cholesterol and triglyceride blood concentrations and all-cause in-hospital death and readmission within 14 and 30 days and 1 year were determined in univariate and multivariate analyses.
Patients with TC in the lower quartile and LDL-C < 70 mg/dl had greater risk of the outcomes measured than individuals with a TC level in the remaining quartiles and LDL-C ≥ 70 mg/dl. Moreover, patients with TC in the highest quartile, OR (95% CI): 0.36 (0.13-0.99), < 0.05, and LDL-C ≥ 115 mg/dl, OR (95% CI): 0.53 (0.37-0.77), < 0.05, had the lowest all-cause in-hospital mortality. However, multivariate analysis using logistic regression and a Cox proportional hazard model showed no significant influence of blood lipid levels on the occurrence of the outcomes measured.
A significant effect of a "cholesterol paradox" linking better prognosis with higher blood lipid concentration was found only in univariate analysis but, after adjustment for clinical characteristics in multivariate analysis, the plasma lipid level had a neutral influence on the occurrence of the measured outcomes. This suggests that a low cholesterol level should be interpreted as a biomarker of illness severity.
有证据表明胆固醇浓度与心血管疾病风险之间存在正相关关系。然而,已有报道称胆固醇水平低的患者死亡率更高(“胆固醇悖论”)。
回顾了2014年至2016年间34191名住院患者的病历,通过单因素和多因素分析确定了总胆固醇(TC)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)和甘油三酯的血液浓度与全因院内死亡以及14天、30天和1年内再入院之间的关系。
与TC水平处于其余四分位数且LDL-C≥70mg/dl的个体相比,TC处于最低四分位数且LDL-C<70mg/dl的患者发生所测量结局的风险更高。此外,TC处于最高四分位数[比值比(95%置信区间):0.36(0.13 - 0.99),<0.05]且LDL-C≥115mg/dl[比值比(95%置信区间):0.53(0.37 - 0.77),<0.05]的患者全因院内死亡率最低。然而,使用逻辑回归和Cox比例风险模型进行的多因素分析显示血脂水平对所测量结局的发生没有显著影响。
仅在单因素分析中发现了“胆固醇悖论”,即血脂浓度越高预后越好,但在多因素分析中对临床特征进行调整后,血浆脂质水平对所测量结局的发生具有中性影响。这表明低胆固醇水平应被解释为疾病严重程度的生物标志物。