Suppr超能文献

移动医疗在尼日利亚产前护理和医疗机构分娩中的成本效益。

Cost Effectiveness of Mobile Health for Antenatal Care and Facility Births in Nigeria.

机构信息

Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, US.

Pardee RAND Graduate School, US.

出版信息

Ann Glob Health. 2018 Nov 5;84(4):592-602. doi: 10.9204/aogh.2364.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of mobile technology in the health sector, often referred to as mHealth, is an innovation that is being used in countries to improve health outcomes and increase and improve both the demand and supply of health care services. This study assesses the actual cost-effectiveness of initiating and implementing the use of the mHealth as a supply side job aid for antenatal care. The study also estimates the cost-effectiveness ratio if mHealth was also used to encourage and track women through facility delivery.

METHODS

The methodology utilized a retrospective, micro-costing technique to extract costing data from health facilities and administrative offices to estimate the costs of implementing the mHealth antenatal care program and estimate the cost of facility delivery for those that used the antenatal care services in the year 2014. Five different costing tools were developed to assist in the costing analysis.

FINDINGS

The results show that the provision of tetanus toxoid vaccination and malaria prophylaxis during pregnancy and improved labor and delivery during facility delivery contributed the most to mortality reductions for women, neonates and stillbirths in mHealth facilities versus non-mHealth facilities. The cost-effectiveness ratio of this program for antenatal care and no demand-side generation for facility delivery is US$13,739 per life saved. The cost-effectiveness ratio adding in an additional demand-side generation for facility births reduces to US$9,806 per life saved.

CONCLUSION

These results show that mHealth programs are inexpensive and save a number of lives for the dollar investment and could save additional lives and funds if women were also encouraged to seek facility delivery.

摘要

背景

移动技术在医疗领域的应用,通常被称为移动医疗(mHealth),是一种创新,正在被各国用于改善健康结果,并增加和改善医疗服务的供需。本研究评估了启动和实施使用移动医疗作为产前护理供应方辅助工具的实际成本效益。该研究还估计了如果移动医疗也被用于鼓励和跟踪妇女进行设施分娩的成本效益比。

方法

该方法利用回顾性微观成本核算技术,从卫生设施和行政办公室提取成本数据,以估计实施移动医疗产前护理计划的成本,并估计 2014 年使用产前护理服务的人在设施分娩的成本。开发了五种不同的成本核算工具来协助成本分析。

结果

结果表明,在移动医疗设施中,为孕妇提供破伤风类毒素疫苗接种和疟疾预防,以及改善设施分娩期间的劳动和分娩,对降低妇女、新生儿和死产的死亡率贡献最大。该项目用于产前护理和无设施分娩需求侧产生的成本效益比为每挽救一条生命 13739 美元。如果鼓励妇女也寻求设施分娩,将额外的需求侧生育产生纳入成本效益比,每挽救一条生命的成本降低至 9806 美元。

结论

这些结果表明,移动医疗项目成本低廉,每投资一美元可挽救许多生命,如果鼓励妇女也寻求设施分娩,还可以挽救更多的生命和资金。

相似文献

1
Cost Effectiveness of Mobile Health for Antenatal Care and Facility Births in Nigeria.
Ann Glob Health. 2018 Nov 5;84(4):592-602. doi: 10.9204/aogh.2364.
2
Cost of antenatal care for the health sector and for households in Rwanda.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 10;18(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3013-1.
10
Acceptability and user experiences of a patient-held smart card for antenatal services in Nigeria: a qualitative study.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Mar 22;23(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05494-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Appraising eHealth Investment for Africa: Scoping Review and Development of a Framework.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Sep 25;21(10):1277. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21101277.
3
Efficacy and feasibility of a digital speech therapy for post-stroke dysarthria: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Front Neurol. 2024 Jan 31;15:1305297. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1305297. eCollection 2024.
4
Integration of Telehealth in Routine Perinatal Care: A Model of Care for Primary Healthcare Clinics in Saudi Arabia.
Cureus. 2023 Oct 18;15(10):e47295. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47295. eCollection 2023 Oct.
6
A New eHealth Investment Appraisal Framework for Africa: Validation.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jul 21;20(14):6426. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20146426.
8
EHealth Investment Appraisal in Africa: A Scoping Review.
Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:469580211059999. doi: 10.1177/00469580211059999.
9
COVID-19 Pandemic: Adaptation in Antenatal Care for Better Pregnancy Outcomes.
Front Glob Womens Health. 2020 Nov 13;1:599327. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2020.599327. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
mHealth Interventions in Low-Income Countries to Address Maternal Health: A Systematic Review.
Ann Glob Health. 2016 Sep-Oct;82(5):922-935. doi: 10.1016/j.aogh.2016.09.001.
2
Beyond utilization: measuring effective coverage of obstetric care along the quality cascade.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Feb 1;29(1):104-110. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw141.
4
Sustainable Cost Models for mHealth at Scale: Modeling Program Data from m4RH Tanzania.
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 29;11(1):e0148011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148011. eCollection 2016.
5
Incorporating Demand and Supply Constraints into Economic Evaluations in Low-Income and Middle-Income Countries.
Health Econ. 2016 Feb;25 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):95-115. doi: 10.1002/hec.3306. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
8
mHealth innovations as health system strengthening tools: 12 common applications and a visual framework.
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2013 Aug 6;1(2):160-71. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00031. eCollection 2013 Aug.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验