Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 Jan;10(1):129-139. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1678551. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
Despite evidence suggesting higher quality and safer care in hospitals with comprehensive electronic health record (EHR) systems, factors related to advanced system usability remain largely unknown, particularly among nurses. Little empirical research has examined sociotechnical factors, such as the work environment, that may shape the relationship between advanced EHR adoption and quality of care.
The objective of this study was to examine the independent and joint effects of comprehensive EHR adoption and the hospital work environment on nurse reports of EHR usability and nurse-reported quality of care and safety.
This study was a secondary analysis of nurse and hospital survey data. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models were used to assess the relationship between EHR adoption level, work environment, and a set of EHR usability and quality/safety outcomes. The sample included 12,377 nurses working in 353 hospitals.
In fully adjusted models, comprehensive EHR adoption was associated with lower odds of nurses reporting poor usability outcomes, such as dissatisfaction with the system (odds ratio [OR]: 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61-0.92). The work environment was associated with all usability outcomes with nurses in better environments being less likely to report negatively. Comprehensive EHRs (OR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.71-0.96) and better work environments (OR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.42-0.52) were associated with lower odds of nurses reporting fair/poor quality of care, while poor patient safety grade was associated with the work environment (OR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.46-0.54), but not EHR adoption level.
Our findings suggest that adoption of a comprehensive EHR is associated with more positive usability ratings and higher quality of care. We also found that-independent of EHR adoption level-the hospital work environment plays a significant role in how nurses evaluate EHR usability and whether EHRs have their intended effects on improving quality and safety of care.
尽管有证据表明,在拥有全面电子健康记录(EHR)系统的医院中,医疗质量和安全性更高,但与先进系统可用性相关的因素在很大程度上仍不为人知,尤其是在护士中。很少有实证研究探讨可能影响先进 EHR 采用与医疗质量关系的社会技术因素,例如工作环境。
本研究旨在检验全面 EHR 采用和医院工作环境对护士报告的 EHR 可用性以及护士报告的医疗质量和安全性的独立和联合影响。
本研究是对护士和医院调查数据的二次分析。使用未经调整和调整后的逻辑回归模型来评估 EHR 采用水平、工作环境以及一系列 EHR 可用性和质量/安全结果之间的关系。样本包括在 353 家医院工作的 12377 名护士。
在完全调整的模型中,全面 EHR 采用与护士报告较差的可用性结果(例如对系统不满意)的可能性降低有关(比值比 [OR]:0.75;95%置信区间 [CI]:0.61-0.92)。工作环境与所有可用性结果相关,环境较好的护士不太可能报告负面结果。全面 EHR(OR:0.83;95%CI:0.71-0.96)和更好的工作环境(OR:0.47;95%CI:0.42-0.52)与护士报告较差的医疗质量的可能性降低有关,而较差的患者安全等级与工作环境有关(OR:0.50;95%CI:0.46-0.54),而与 EHR 采用水平无关。
我们的研究结果表明,采用全面的 EHR 与更积极的可用性评分和更高的医疗质量有关。我们还发现,独立于 EHR 采用水平,医院工作环境在护士评估 EHR 可用性以及 EHR 是否对提高医疗质量和安全性产生预期效果方面起着重要作用。