1Arctic Investigations Program, Division of Preparedness and Emerging Infections, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Anchorage, Alaska.
2Yukon-Kuskokwim Health Corporation, Bethel, Alaska.
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2019 Aug;19(8):563-575. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2018.2390. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
Due to their close relationship with the environment, Alaskans are at risk for zoonotic pathogen infection. One way to assess a population's disease burden is to determine the seroprevalence of pathogens of interest. The objective of this study was to determine the seroprevalence of 11 zoonotic pathogens in people living in Alaska. In a 2007 avian influenza exposure study, we recruited persons with varying wild bird exposures. Using sera from this study, we tested for antibodies to spp., spp., , , spp., spp., , , California serogroup bunyaviruses, and hepatitis E virus (HEV). Eight hundred eighty-seven persons had sera tested, including 454 subsistence bird hunters and family members, 160 sport bird hunters, 77 avian wildlife biologists, and 196 persons with no wild bird exposure. A subset ( = 481) of sera was tested for California serogroup bunyaviruses. We detected antibodies to 10/11 pathogens. Seropositivity to spp. (29%), California serotype bunyaviruses (27%), and (19%) was the most common; 63% (301/481) of sera had antibodies to at least one pathogen. Using a multivariable logistic regression model, spp. seropositivity was higher in females (35.7% vs. 25.0%; = 0.01) and . seropositivity was higher in males (21.8% vs. 15.5%; = 0.02). Alaska Native persons were more likely than non-Native persons to be seropositive to (11.7% vs. 3.8%; = 0.005) and less likely to be seropositive to HEV (0.4% vs. 4.1%; = 0.01). Seropositivity to spp., , HEV, and was associated with increasing age ( ≤ 0.01 for all) as was seropositivity to ≥1 pathogen ( < 0.0001). Seropositivity to zoonotic pathogens is common among Alaskans with the highest to spp., California serogroup bunyaviruses, and . This study provides a baseline for use in assessing seroprevalence changes over time.
由于与环境的密切关系,阿拉斯加人面临着人畜共患病原体感染的风险。评估人群疾病负担的一种方法是确定感兴趣的病原体的血清流行率。本研究的目的是确定生活在阿拉斯加的人群中 11 种人畜共患病原体的血清流行率。在 2007 年的禽流感暴露研究中,我们招募了具有不同野生鸟类接触史的人。使用该研究的血清,我们检测了对 spp.、 spp.、 、 、 spp.、 spp.、 、 、加利福尼亚血清型布尼亚病毒和戊型肝炎病毒 (HEV) 的抗体。共有 887 人进行了血清检测,包括 454 名从事野生鸟类狩猎的人和家庭成员、160 名运动鸟类狩猎者、77 名鸟类野生动物生物学家和 196 名没有接触野生鸟类的人。血清亚组( = 481)检测加利福尼亚血清型布尼亚病毒。我们检测到对 10/11 种病原体的抗体。 spp.(29%)、加利福尼亚血清型布尼亚病毒(27%)和 (19%)的血清阳性率最高;63%(301/481)的血清至少有一种病原体的抗体。使用多变量逻辑回归模型,女性的 spp.血清阳性率更高(35.7% vs. 25.0%; = 0.01),而男性的 seropositivity 更高(21.8% vs. 15.5%; = 0.02)。与非原住民相比,阿拉斯加原住民更有可能对 (11.7% vs. 3.8%; = 0.005)和不太可能对 HEV 呈血清阳性(0.4% vs. 4.1%; = 0.01)。 spp.、 、HEV 和 的血清阳性率与年龄呈正相关(所有 ≤ 0.01),与≥1 种病原体的血清阳性率呈正相关( < 0.0001)。 人畜共患病原体的血清阳性率在阿拉斯加人中很常见,其中 spp.、加利福尼亚血清型布尼亚病毒和 的血清阳性率最高。本研究为评估随时间推移的血清流行率变化提供了基线。