Markland Sarah, Weppelmann Thomas A, Ma Zhengxin, Lee Shinyoung, Mir Raies A, Teng Lin, Ginn Amber, Lee Choonghee, Ukhanova Maria, Galindo Sebastian, Carr Chad, DiLorenzo Nicolas, Ahn Soohyoun, Mah Jae-Hyung, Kim Hae-Yeong, Mai Volker, Mobley Ray, Morris J Glenn, Jeong KwangCheol Casey
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Front Microbiol. 2019 Feb 7;10:176. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00176. eCollection 2019.
Although the over-use of antibiotics during food animal production is a potential driver of antimicrobial resistant microorganisms (ARMs), a high prevalence of cefotaxime resistant bacteria (CRB) has been observed in grazing animals raised without antibiotic supplementation. In this cross-sectional study, the prevalence and concentration of CRB in beef cattle on grazing farms were investigated. Fecal samples from the recto-anal junction of cattle ( = 840) and environmental samples ( = 258) were collected from 17 farms in North and Central Florida in the United States, and a survey of farm characteristics, animal husbandry practices, and antibiotic usage was conducted. CRB were detected in fecal samples from 47.4% of all cattle, with the prevalence ranging from 21.1 to 87.5% on farms, and significantly higher ( < 0.001) in calves compared to adult cows (54.1 vs. 41.8%). Environmental samples had a higher prevalence than fecal samples ( < 0.001), with CRB detected in 88.6% of water, 98.7% of soil, and 95.7% of forage samples. Compared to the concentration (log CFU/g) of CRB in fecal samples (2.95, 95% CI: 2.89, 3.02), the concentration of CRB was higher ( < 0.001) in soil and forage samples (5.37, 95% CI: 5.16, 5.57) and lower ( < 0.001) in water samples (1.08, 95% CI: 0.82, 1.36). Soil microbiota from farms with high prevalence of CRB clustered closer together and the proportion of Phylum Proteobacteria was higher on farms with high prevalence of CRB resistance. Large farming operations were associated with a 58% higher likelihood of CRB detection in fecal samples. Regular cleaning of drinking troughs and the addition of ionophores to feed were associated with CRB reduction in fecal samples. Taken together, the widespread of CRB into both cattle seldom treated with cephalosporin antibiotics and the surrounding environment suggests the environment is a natural source of antimicrobial resistance in beef cattle.
尽管食用动物生产过程中抗生素的过度使用是抗菌耐药微生物(ARMs)的一个潜在驱动因素,但在未补充抗生素饲养的放牧动物中,已观察到头孢噻肟耐药菌(CRB)的高流行率。在这项横断面研究中,对放牧农场肉牛中CRB的流行率和浓度进行了调查。从美国佛罗里达州北部和中部的17个农场收集了牛直肠肛门交界处的粪便样本(n = 840)和环境样本(n = 258),并对农场特征、畜牧实践和抗生素使用情况进行了调查。在所有牛的粪便样本中,47.4%检测到CRB,各农场的流行率在21.1%至87.5%之间,犊牛中的流行率显著高于成年母牛(<0.001)(54.1%对41.8%)。环境样本的流行率高于粪便样本(<0.001),在88.6%的水样、98.7%的土壤样本和95.7%的草料样本中检测到CRB。与粪便样本中CRB的浓度(log CFU/g)(2.95,95%CI:2.89,3.02)相比,土壤和草料样本中CRB的浓度更高(<0.001)(5.37,95%CI:5.16,5.57),而水样中更低(<0.001)(1.08,95%CI:0.82,1.36)。CRB高流行率农场的土壤微生物群聚集得更紧密,CRB耐药高流行率农场中变形菌门的比例更高。大型养殖企业粪便样本中检测到CRB的可能性高58%。定期清洁饮水槽和在饲料中添加离子载体与粪便样本中CRB的减少有关。综上所述,CRB在很少使用头孢菌素抗生素治疗的牛群和周围环境中广泛存在,这表明环境是肉牛抗菌耐药性的天然来源。