• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尸检标准化死亡率审查:一项为改善患者预后提供方法的试点研究。

Autopsy Standardized Mortality Review: A Pilot Study Offering a Methodology for Improved Patient Outcomes.

作者信息

Early C A, Gilliland M G F, Kelly K L, Oliver W R, Kragel P J

机构信息

Department of Pathology, The Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.

Regional Forensic Center, Knoxville, TN, USA.

出版信息

Acad Pathol. 2019 Feb 12;6:2374289519826281. doi: 10.1177/2374289519826281. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/2374289519826281
PMID:30793022
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6376500/
Abstract

A standardized mortality review of hospital autopsies identified discrepancies between clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings, unexpected deaths, adequacy of diagnostic workup, presence of adverse event, and type of a quality issue if present. The standardized review elements were chosen based on a review of quality metrics commonly used by hospitals. The review was completed by the pathologist based on their initial autopsy findings. The final autopsy report was later reviewed to confirm the initial review findings. Major discrepancies in diagnosis were categorized as class I or II based on the modified Goldman criteria. Ninety-six hospital autopsy cases from January 2015 to February 2018 were included in the study. The overall major discrepancy rate was 27%. Class I discrepancies, where a diagnosis found at autopsy might have improved survival had it been made premortem, were identified in 16% of cases. Categories associated with increased discrepancy rates included unexpected deaths, inadequate workup, abnormal labs or imaging not addressed, and certain quality issues. Deaths not expected at admission but expected at the time of death, those with adverse events, those within 48 hours of a procedure, those within 48 hours of admission, those with physician-specific quality issues, and those with system or process issues were not significantly related to diagnostic accuracy.

摘要

一项针对医院尸检的标准化死亡率审查确定了临床诊断与尸检结果之间的差异、意外死亡情况、诊断检查的充分性、不良事件的存在以及(若存在)质量问题的类型。标准化审查要素是根据对医院常用质量指标的审查选定的。审查由病理学家根据其初步尸检结果完成。随后对最终尸检报告进行审查以确认初步审查结果。根据改良的戈德曼标准,诊断中的重大差异被归类为I类或II类。该研究纳入了2015年1月至2018年2月的96例医院尸检病例。总体重大差异率为27%。在16%的病例中发现了I类差异,即在尸检中发现的诊断若在生前做出可能会改善生存率。与差异率增加相关的类别包括意外死亡、检查不充分、未处理的异常实验室检查结果或影像学检查结果以及某些质量问题。入院时未预期但死亡时预期的死亡病例、发生不良事件的病例、手术48小时内的病例、入院48小时内的病例、存在医生特定质量问题的病例以及存在系统或流程问题的病例与诊断准确性无显著相关性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01fa/6376500/7ad444b3ec2e/10.1177_2374289519826281-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01fa/6376500/7ad444b3ec2e/10.1177_2374289519826281-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01fa/6376500/7ad444b3ec2e/10.1177_2374289519826281-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Autopsy Standardized Mortality Review: A Pilot Study Offering a Methodology for Improved Patient Outcomes.尸检标准化死亡率审查:一项为改善患者预后提供方法的试点研究。
Acad Pathol. 2019 Feb 12;6:2374289519826281. doi: 10.1177/2374289519826281. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
2
How the pediatric autopsy yields valuable information in a vertically integrated health care system.儿科尸检如何在垂直整合的医疗保健系统中产生有价值的信息。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2004 Nov;128(11):1239-46. doi: 10.5858/2004-128-1239-HTPAYV.
3
Premortem clinical diagnoses and postmortem autopsy findings: discrepancies in critically ill cancer patients.临终前临床诊断与尸检结果:重症癌症患者中的差异
Crit Care. 2007;11(2):R48. doi: 10.1186/cc5782.
4
Autopsy and pre-mortem diagnostic discrepancy review in an Irish tertiary PICU.爱尔兰三级 PICU 中的尸检和生前诊断差异回顾。
Eur J Pediatr. 2021 Dec;180(12):3519-3524. doi: 10.1007/s00431-021-04155-3. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
5
Autopsies in trauma do not add to peer review or quality assurance.创伤尸检无助于同行评审或质量保证。
J Trauma. 2002 Aug;53(2):321-5. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200208000-00022.
6
Discrepancies Between Clinical Diagnoses and Autopsy Findings in Critically Ill Children: A Prospective Study.危重症儿童临床诊断与尸检结果的差异:一项前瞻性研究。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2016 Dec;146(6):701-708. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqw187. Epub 2016 Dec 10.
7
Diagnostic discrepancies between antemortem clinical diagnosis and autopsy findings in pediatric cancer patients.儿科癌症患者生前临床诊断与尸检结果的诊断差异。
Virchows Arch. 2021 Jun;478(6):1179-1185. doi: 10.1007/s00428-020-03002-4. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
8
Comparison of antemortem clinical diagnosis and post-mortem findings in intensive care unit patients.重症监护病房患者生前临床诊断与死后发现的比较。
Virchows Arch. 2021 Aug;479(2):385-392. doi: 10.1007/s00428-020-03016-y. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
9
Use of the autopsy in Northern Ireland and its value in perioperative deaths.北爱尔兰尸检的应用及其在围手术期死亡中的价值。
IARC Sci Publ. 1991(112):115-24.
10
Clinical vs. autopsy diagnostic discrepancies in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis of autopsy series.重症监护病房临床与尸检诊断差异:尸检系列的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Dec;50(12):1971-1982. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07641-y. Epub 2024 Sep 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Hydrophilic Polymer Embolization-A Scoping Review of the Available Literature with Focus on Organ Involvement and Outcomes.亲水性聚合物栓塞术——对现有文献的范围综述,重点关注器官受累情况和治疗结果。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 11;14(2):433. doi: 10.3390/jcm14020433.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Clinical Diagnoses and Autopsy Findings: Six-Year Retrospective Study.临床诊断与尸检结果的比较:六年回顾性研究
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017 Sep;141(9):1262-1266. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2016-0488-OA. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
2
2007Autopsy Patterns in 2003.2007年2003年的尸检模式。
Vital Health Stat 20. 2007 Mar(32):1-27.
3
Who is at risk for diagnostic discrepancies? Comparison of pre- and postmortal diagnoses in 1800 patients of 3 medical decades in East and West Berlin.哪些人存在诊断差异的风险?对东、西柏林 3 个医学年代的 1800 名患者的生前和死后诊断进行比较。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037460. Epub 2012 May 22.
4
Clinical setting and extent of premortem evaluation do not predict autopsy discrepancy rates.临床环境和生前评估的范围并不能预测尸检差异率。
Mod Pathol. 2010 Sep;23(9):1225-30. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.107. Epub 2010 Jun 4.
5
Comparison of the clinical diagnosis and subsequent autopsy findings in medical malpractice.医疗事故中临床诊断与后续尸检结果的比较。
Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2010 Sep;31(3):218-21. doi: 10.1097/PAF.0b013e3181e040d4.
6
Clinico-pathological discrepancies in a general university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil.巴西圣保罗一所综合大学医院中的临床病理差异。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2008 Oct;63(5):581-8. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322008000500003.
7
Clinical, educational, and epidemiological value of autopsy.尸检的临床、教育及流行病学价值。
Lancet. 2007 Apr 28;369(9571):1471-1480. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60376-6.
8
Changes in rates of autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time: a systematic review.尸检发现的诊断错误率随时间的变化:一项系统综述
JAMA. 2003 Jun 4;289(21):2849-56. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.21.2849.
9
The autopsy: a professional responsibility in assuring quality of care.尸检:确保医疗质量的一项专业职责。
Am J Med Qual. 2002 Mar-Apr;17(2):56-60. doi: 10.1177/106286060201700203.
10
Diagnostic errors in three medical eras: a necropsy study.三个医学时代的诊断错误:一项尸检研究
Lancet. 2000 Jun 10;355(9220):2027-31. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02349-7.