Suppr超能文献

尸检标准化死亡率审查:一项为改善患者预后提供方法的试点研究。

Autopsy Standardized Mortality Review: A Pilot Study Offering a Methodology for Improved Patient Outcomes.

作者信息

Early C A, Gilliland M G F, Kelly K L, Oliver W R, Kragel P J

机构信息

Department of Pathology, The Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.

Regional Forensic Center, Knoxville, TN, USA.

出版信息

Acad Pathol. 2019 Feb 12;6:2374289519826281. doi: 10.1177/2374289519826281. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

A standardized mortality review of hospital autopsies identified discrepancies between clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings, unexpected deaths, adequacy of diagnostic workup, presence of adverse event, and type of a quality issue if present. The standardized review elements were chosen based on a review of quality metrics commonly used by hospitals. The review was completed by the pathologist based on their initial autopsy findings. The final autopsy report was later reviewed to confirm the initial review findings. Major discrepancies in diagnosis were categorized as class I or II based on the modified Goldman criteria. Ninety-six hospital autopsy cases from January 2015 to February 2018 were included in the study. The overall major discrepancy rate was 27%. Class I discrepancies, where a diagnosis found at autopsy might have improved survival had it been made premortem, were identified in 16% of cases. Categories associated with increased discrepancy rates included unexpected deaths, inadequate workup, abnormal labs or imaging not addressed, and certain quality issues. Deaths not expected at admission but expected at the time of death, those with adverse events, those within 48 hours of a procedure, those within 48 hours of admission, those with physician-specific quality issues, and those with system or process issues were not significantly related to diagnostic accuracy.

摘要

一项针对医院尸检的标准化死亡率审查确定了临床诊断与尸检结果之间的差异、意外死亡情况、诊断检查的充分性、不良事件的存在以及(若存在)质量问题的类型。标准化审查要素是根据对医院常用质量指标的审查选定的。审查由病理学家根据其初步尸检结果完成。随后对最终尸检报告进行审查以确认初步审查结果。根据改良的戈德曼标准,诊断中的重大差异被归类为I类或II类。该研究纳入了2015年1月至2018年2月的96例医院尸检病例。总体重大差异率为27%。在16%的病例中发现了I类差异,即在尸检中发现的诊断若在生前做出可能会改善生存率。与差异率增加相关的类别包括意外死亡、检查不充分、未处理的异常实验室检查结果或影像学检查结果以及某些质量问题。入院时未预期但死亡时预期的死亡病例、发生不良事件的病例、手术48小时内的病例、入院48小时内的病例、存在医生特定质量问题的病例以及存在系统或流程问题的病例与诊断准确性无显著相关性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01fa/6376500/7ad444b3ec2e/10.1177_2374289519826281-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验