• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床环境和生前评估的范围并不能预测尸检差异率。

Clinical setting and extent of premortem evaluation do not predict autopsy discrepancy rates.

机构信息

Department of Anatomic and Clinical Pathology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029, USA.

出版信息

Mod Pathol. 2010 Sep;23(9):1225-30. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.107. Epub 2010 Jun 4.

DOI:10.1038/modpathol.2010.107
PMID:20526285
Abstract

Autopsy rates have been affected by a number of factors, including technological advances and clinician beliefs of the diminished value of the autopsy. Such factors have resulted in a cultural shift in medicine away from the autopsy. Despite this shift, a number of studies have shown significant differences between antemortem clinical diagnoses and postmortem findings. Surveys of clinician beliefs about the autopsy have pointed toward antemortem diagnostic advancements as an important factor in declining rates. No study to date has addressed the hypothesis that such perceptions in diagnostic certainty have been matched by an actual decay in the yield of valuable or new information obtained by the autopsy. To address this hypothesis, we retrospectively compared the class I and class II discrepancies identified in 284 patients who died in three clinical settings with differing intensities of antemortem diagnostic workup. Despite a significantly different intensity of antemortem workup for patients in each clinical setting, including patients on a medical intensive care unit, patients on a surgical service and patients in an affiliated nursing home, discrepancy rates were found to be similar. Overall discrepancy rates for the medical intensive care unit, surgery service and nursing home patients were 27.8, 32.7 and 31.3%, respectively (P=0.84). In addition, we found no statistical difference in the complexity of workup in discrepant and nondiscrepant cases in each clinical setting. Our study data refute the hypothesis that the intensity of antemortem diagnostic evaluation correlates with an actual decrease in the rate of major diagnostic discrepancies identified at autopsy.

摘要

尸检率受到多种因素的影响,包括技术进步和临床医生对尸检价值降低的信念。这些因素导致医学文化从尸检转向。尽管如此,许多研究表明,生前临床诊断与死后发现之间存在显著差异。对临床医生对尸检的信念的调查表明,生前诊断进展是尸检率下降的一个重要因素。迄今为止,尚无研究探讨这样一种假设,即对诊断确定性的这种看法是否与尸检获得的有价值或新信息的实际衰减相匹配。为了验证这一假设,我们回顾性比较了在三个临床环境中死亡的 284 名患者的 I 级和 II 级差异,这些患者的生前诊断检查强度不同。尽管每个临床环境中的患者的生前检查强度明显不同,包括在重症监护病房的患者、外科病房的患者和附属疗养院的患者,但发现差异率相似。重症监护病房、外科病房和疗养院患者的总体差异率分别为 27.8%、32.7%和 31.3%(P=0.84)。此外,我们还发现,在每个临床环境中,差异和非差异病例的检查复杂性之间没有统计学差异。我们的研究数据反驳了这样一种假设,即生前诊断评估的强度与在尸检中确定的主要诊断差异的实际发生率下降相关。

相似文献

1
Clinical setting and extent of premortem evaluation do not predict autopsy discrepancy rates.临床环境和生前评估的范围并不能预测尸检差异率。
Mod Pathol. 2010 Sep;23(9):1225-30. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.107. Epub 2010 Jun 4.
2
Premortem clinical diagnoses and postmortem autopsy findings: discrepancies in critically ill cancer patients.临终前临床诊断与尸检结果:重症癌症患者中的差异
Crit Care. 2007;11(2):R48. doi: 10.1186/cc5782.
3
The discrepancy of antemortem clinical diagnosis and postmortem autopsy diagnosis of lung pathologies in under-five deaths and the reasons for discrepancies: a case series analysis.五岁以下儿童死亡的生前临床诊断与死后尸检诊断肺部病变的差异及差异原因:病例系列分析。
BMC Pediatr. 2024 May 28;24(1):365. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-04854-4.
4
Diagnostic discrepancies between antemortem clinical diagnosis and autopsy findings in pediatric cancer patients.儿科癌症患者生前临床诊断与尸检结果的诊断差异。
Virchows Arch. 2021 Jun;478(6):1179-1185. doi: 10.1007/s00428-020-03002-4. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
5
Comparison of antemortem clinical diagnosis and post-mortem findings in intensive care unit patients.重症监护病房患者生前临床诊断与死后发现的比较。
Virchows Arch. 2021 Aug;479(2):385-392. doi: 10.1007/s00428-020-03016-y. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
6
Comparison between clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings in a pediatric intensive care unit in São Paulo, Brazil.巴西圣保罗一家儿科重症监护病房临床诊断与尸检结果的比较。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2006 Sep;7(5):423-7. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000235257.86519.16.
7
Clinicopathological discrepancies in the diagnoses of childhood causes of death in the CHAMPS network: An analysis of antemortem diagnostic inaccuracies.在 CHAMPS 网络中,儿童死因诊断的临床病理差异:对生前诊断误差的分析。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2024 Jul 20;8(1):e002654. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002654.
8
Autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time in the intensive care unit.随着时间的推移,重症监护病房中尸检发现的诊断错误。
Hum Pathol. 2018 Jun;76:85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2018.02.025. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
9
Who is at risk for diagnostic discrepancies? Comparison of pre- and postmortal diagnoses in 1800 patients of 3 medical decades in East and West Berlin.哪些人存在诊断差异的风险?对东、西柏林 3 个医学年代的 1800 名患者的生前和死后诊断进行比较。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037460. Epub 2012 May 22.
10
Characteristics of discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnoses in the intensive care unit: a 5-year review.重症监护病房临床诊断与尸检诊断差异的特征:一项为期5年的回顾。
Intensive Care Med. 2003 Feb;29(2):321-4. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1576-z. Epub 2002 Nov 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Autopsy rates and diagnostic errors in a Swiss community hospital: a ten-year retrospective analysis.瑞士一家社区医院的尸检率与诊断错误:十年回顾性分析
Virchows Arch. 2025 Mar 4. doi: 10.1007/s00428-025-04060-2.
2
Clinical vs. autopsy diagnostic discrepancies in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis of autopsy series.重症监护病房临床与尸检诊断差异:尸检系列的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Dec;50(12):1971-1982. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07641-y. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
3
Autopsies and quality of cause of death diagnoses.
尸检与死因诊断质量
SAGE Open Med. 2021 Aug 4;9:20503121211037169. doi: 10.1177/20503121211037169. eCollection 2021.
4
Autopsy Standardized Mortality Review: A Pilot Study Offering a Methodology for Improved Patient Outcomes.尸检标准化死亡率审查:一项为改善患者预后提供方法的试点研究。
Acad Pathol. 2019 Feb 12;6:2374289519826281. doi: 10.1177/2374289519826281. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
5
Autopsy kidneys: an overlooked resource.尸检肾脏:一种被忽视的资源。
Autops Case Rep. 2018 Mar 2;8(1):e2018013. doi: 10.4322/acr.2018.013. eCollection 2018 Jan-Mar.
6
Pathophysiology and the Monitoring Methods for Cardiac Arrest Associated Brain Injury.心脏骤停相关性脑损伤的病理生理学及监测方法
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Jan 11;18(1):129. doi: 10.3390/ijms18010129.
7
Autopsy of Adult Patients Deceased in an Academic Hospital: Considerations of Doctors and Next-of-Kin in the Consent Process.学术医院成年死亡患者的尸检:医生和近亲在同意过程中的考量
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 13;11(10):e0163811. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163811. eCollection 2016.
8
Description of in-hospital deaths in Vienna during 1850-2000.1850年至2000年维也纳医院内死亡情况描述。
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2016 Nov;166(15-16):453-461. doi: 10.1007/s10354-016-0463-0. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
9
Postmortem CT is more accurate than clinical diagnosis for identifying the immediate cause of death in hospitalized patients: a prospective autopsy-based study.在确定住院患者的直接死因方面,尸检CT比临床诊断更准确:一项基于前瞻性尸检的研究。
Virchows Arch. 2016 Jul;469(1):101-9. doi: 10.1007/s00428-016-1937-6. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
10
Computerized Tomography Scanning and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Will Terminate the Era of the Autopsy - A Hypothesis.计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像将终结尸检时代——一种假说。
J Cancer. 2016 Jan 1;7(1):115-20. doi: 10.7150/jca.13555. eCollection 2016.