Testoni Ines, De Cataldo Loriana, Ronconi Lucia, Colombo Elisa Silvia, Stefanini Cinzia, Dal Zotto Barbara, Zamperini Adriano
Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology (FISPPA), University of Padova, 35131 Padua, Italy.
Sagol Creative Arts Therapies Research Center, Haifa 31905, Israel.
Animals (Basel). 2019 Feb 21;9(2):67. doi: 10.3390/ani9020067.
In Italy, there are still very few studies on the psychological impact of losing a pet. The need to fill this gap springs from the fact that pet loss counseling services are increasingly being activated. The aim of this study is the Italian adaptation of instruments for veterinary counseling services. The survey instruments adapted were: Pet Bereavement Questionnaire (PBQ) to describe the individual experience of pet-grief; Regret of Bereaved Family Members (RBFM) to assess the family regret; Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) for decision making in end of life; Consultation and Relational Empathy Measure (CARE) to assess the veterinarian relational empathy during clinical encounters. All the instruments obtained good internal reliability, and the results of the confirmative factor analysis of all the Italian versions were in accordance with the original ones. The correlational analysis among the variables evidenced the following aspects: the more the owner feels involved by the veterinarian in the decision making process the more the veterinarian is perceived by the owner as empathetic; when the veterinarian is perceived as empathic and the decision making is shared the owners' pet bereavement distress and regrets are reduced; negative dimensions of bereavement (grief, guilt, anger, intrusive thoughts and decisional regrets) are strictly linked to each other, therefore if one dimension increases or decreases the others do too. The path analysis suggests that developing a veterinary relationship-centered care practice may be beneficial for pet owners facing end-of-life issues and the death of their companion animals since it showed that shared-decision making strategies and empathic communication may reduce negative dimensions of bereavement that may complicate grief. Interestingly, adopting shared decision-making strategies may contribute to be perceived as more empathic. These aspects may be taken into consideration in end-of -life communication training in veterinary medicine.
在意大利,关于失去宠物所产生的心理影响的研究仍然非常少。填补这一空白的需求源于宠物丧失咨询服务越来越多地被启动这一事实。本研究的目的是对兽医咨询服务工具进行意大利语改编。所改编的调查工具包括:用于描述宠物悲伤个体经历的宠物丧亲问卷(PBQ);用于评估家庭遗憾的丧亲家庭成员遗憾问卷(RBFM);用于临终决策的共同决策问卷(SDM-Q-9);用于评估临床会诊期间兽医关系同理心的咨询与关系同理心测量问卷(CARE)。所有工具都具有良好的内部信度,并且所有意大利语版本的验证性因素分析结果与原始版本一致。变量之间的相关分析证明了以下几个方面:在决策过程中,主人感觉兽医参与度越高,主人就越认为兽医具有同理心;当兽医被认为具有同理心且决策是共同做出时,主人的宠物丧亲痛苦和遗憾会减少;丧亲的负面维度(悲伤、内疚、愤怒、侵入性想法和决策遗憾)彼此紧密相连,因此如果一个维度增加或减少,其他维度也会相应变化。路径分析表明,开展以兽医关系为中心的护理实践可能对面临宠物临终问题及其伴侣动物死亡的宠物主人有益,因为研究表明共同决策策略和同理心沟通可能会减少可能使悲伤复杂化的丧亲负面维度。有趣的是,采用共同决策策略可能有助于被认为更具同理心。这些方面在兽医临终沟通培训中可能需要考虑。