Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Save the Children Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 22;9(2):e024392. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024392.
To examine the effect of short (<36 months) and long (≥60 months) birth intervals on adverse pregnancy outcomes in Bangladesh.
DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We analysed data from six Bangladesh Demographic and Health Surveys (1996-1997, 1999-2000, 2004, 2007, 2011 and 2014). We included all singleton non-first live births, most recently born to mothers within 5 years preceding each survey (n=21 382). We defined birth interval according to previous research which suggests that a birth interval between 36 and 59 months is the most ideal interval. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to obtain the crude and adjusted ORs (aOR) respectively to assess the odds of first-day neonatal death, early neonatal death and small birth size for both short (<36 months) and long (≥60 months) spacing between births.
First-day neonatal death, early neonatal death and small birth size.
In the multivariable analysis, compared with births spaced 36-59 months, infants with a birth interval of <36 months had increased odds of first-day neonatal death (aOR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.17 to 3.78) and early neonatal death (aOR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.13 to 2.22). Compared with births spaced 36-59 months, infants with a birth interval of ≥60 months had increased odds of first-day neonatal death (aOR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.10 to 3.73) and small birth size (aOR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.34). When there was a history of any previous pregnancy loss, there was an increase in the odds of first-day and early neonatal death for both short and long birth intervals, although it was not significant.
Birth intervals shorter than 36 months and longer than 59 months are associated with increased odds of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Care-providers, programme managers and policymakers could focus on promoting an optimal birth interval between 36 and 59 months in postpartum family planning.
探讨孟加拉国短期(<36 个月)和长期(≥60 个月)生育间隔对不良妊娠结局的影响。
设计、地点和参与者:我们分析了来自孟加拉国六次人口与健康调查(1996-1997 年、1999-2000 年、2004 年、2007 年、2011 年和 2014 年)的数据。我们纳入了最近一次出生于调查前 5 年内的所有单胎非首次活产儿(n=21382)。我们根据既往研究定义了生育间隔,该研究表明 36-59 个月的生育间隔是最理想的间隔。进行了单变量和多变量分析,以分别获得粗比值比(OR)和调整后的比值比(aOR),以评估短期(<36 个月)和长期(≥60 个月)生育间隔与新生儿第一天死亡、早期新生儿死亡和出生体重偏轻的几率。
新生儿第一天死亡、早期新生儿死亡和出生体重偏轻。
在多变量分析中,与间隔 36-59 个月的分娩相比,间隔<36 个月的婴儿新生儿第一天死亡的几率增加(aOR:2.11,95%可信区间:1.17 至 3.78)和早期新生儿死亡的几率增加(aOR:1.58,95%可信区间:1.13 至 2.22)。与间隔 36-59 个月的分娩相比,间隔≥60 个月的婴儿新生儿第一天死亡的几率增加(aOR:2.02,95%可信区间:1.10 至 3.73)和出生体重偏轻的几率增加(aOR:1.17,95%可信区间:1.02 至 1.34)。当有任何既往妊娠丢失史时,短期和长期生育间隔都会增加新生儿第一天和早期死亡的几率,尽管这并不显著。
间隔小于 36 个月和大于 59 个月与不良妊娠结局的几率增加有关。保健提供者、项目管理人员和政策制定者可以专注于促进产后计划生育中 36-59 个月的最佳生育间隔。