• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Multi-Institution Collaboration to Define Core Content and Design Flexible Curricular Components for a Foundational Medical School Course: Implications for National Curriculum Reform.多机构合作定义基础医学院课程的核心内容和设计灵活的课程组成部分:对国家课程改革的启示。
Acad Med. 2019 Jun;94(6):819-825. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002663.
2
Use of the NBME Comprehensive Basic Science Examination as a progress test in the preclerkship curriculum of a new medical school.将美国国家医学考试委员会综合基础科学考试用作一所新医学院临床实习前课程的进展测试。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2014 Dec;38(4):315-20. doi: 10.1152/advan.00047.2014.
3
The Use of Short, Animated, Patient-Centered Springboard Videos to Underscore the Clinical Relevance of Preclinical Medical Student Education.使用简短、生动、以患者为中心的跳板视频来强调临床前医学生教育的临床相关性。
Acad Med. 2017 Jul;92(7):961-965. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001574.
4
Relationship between pathology curricular approaches and performance in the United States medical licensing examination (USMLE), step 1: a national cross-sectional study.美国医师执照考试(USMLE)第一步中病理学课程教学方法与考试成绩的关系:一项全国性横断面研究
Hum Pathol. 2003 May;34(5):417-22. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(03)00082-0.
5
Undergraduate basic science preparation for dental school.牙科学校的本科基础科学准备。
J Dent Educ. 2002 Nov;66(11):1252-9.
6
Challenges Associated With Moving the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 to After the Core Clerkships and How to Approach Them.将美国医师执照考试(USMLE)第 1 步移至核心实习之后相关的挑战及应对方法。
Acad Med. 2019 Jun;94(6):775-780. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002651.
7
Multivariable analysis of factors associated with USMLE scores across U.S. medical schools.多变量分析与美国医学院 USMLE 分数相关的因素。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 May 20;19(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1605-z.
8
Lessons learned about integrating a medical school curriculum: perceptions of students, faculty and curriculum leaders.关于整合医学院课程的经验教训:学生、教师和课程领导者的看法。
Med Educ. 2008 Aug;42(8):778-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03110.x.
9
Can a flexible medical curriculum promote student learning and satisfaction?灵活的医学课程能促进学生学习并提高满意度吗?
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2007 Sep;36(9):713-8.
10
A comparison of student performance on discipline-specific versus integrated exams in a medical school course.医学院课程中特定学科考试与综合考试中学生表现的比较。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2013 Dec;37(4):370-6. doi: 10.1152/advan.00015.2013.

引用本文的文献

1
Approaches to integrating online videos into health professions curricula: educators' perspectives from multiple institutions.将在线视频融入健康专业课程的方法:来自多个机构的教育工作者观点
MedEdPublish (2016). 2022 Sep 29;12:52. doi: 10.12688/mep.19179.2. eCollection 2022.
2
Allergy education and training for physicians.针对医生的过敏症教育与培训。
World Allergy Organ J. 2021 Nov 10;14(10):100589. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2021.100589. eCollection 2021 Oct.
3
Use of Commercially Produced Medical Education Videos in a Cardiovascular Curriculum: Multiple Cohort Study.心血管课程中商业制作的医学教育视频的使用:多队列研究
JMIR Med Educ. 2021 Oct 7;7(4):e27441. doi: 10.2196/27441.
4
Preclinical Assessment Performance as a Predictor of USMLE Step 1 Scores or Passing Status.临床前评估表现作为美国执业医师资格考试第一步分数或及格状态的预测指标。
Med Sci Educ. 2021 Jun 7;31(4):1453-1462. doi: 10.1007/s40670-021-01334-7. eCollection 2021 Aug.
5
Pre-clinical remote undergraduate medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey study.COVID-19 大流行期间的临床前远程本科医学教育:一项调查研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02445-2.
6
Perfectionism, impostor phenomenon, and mental health in medicine: a literature review.医学领域中的完美主义、冒名顶替现象与心理健康:一项文献综述
Int J Med Educ. 2020 Sep 28;11:201-213. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5f54.c8f8.
7
Pre-Clinical Remote Undergraduate Medical Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Survey Study&nbsp.COVID-19大流行期间的临床前远程本科医学教育:一项调查研究
Res Sq. 2020 Jun 10:rs.3.rs-33870. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-33870/v1.
8
Inoculating a New Generation: Immunology in Medical Education.为新一代接种疫苗:医学教育中的免疫学。
Front Immunol. 2019 Nov 1;10:2548. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02548. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
A Proposal for a Shared Medical School Curricular Ecosystem.建立共享医学教育课程生态系统的建议。
Acad Med. 2018 Aug;93(8):1125-1128. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002194.
2
Finding a Path to Entrustment in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Progress Report From the AAMC Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency Entrustment Concept Group.探寻本科医学教育中的托付之道:美国医学协会(AAMC)住院医师入职核心可托付专业活动托付概念小组的进展报告
Acad Med. 2017 Jun;92(6):774-779. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001544.
3
The Use of Short, Animated, Patient-Centered Springboard Videos to Underscore the Clinical Relevance of Preclinical Medical Student Education.使用简短、生动、以患者为中心的跳板视频来强调临床前医学生教育的临床相关性。
Acad Med. 2017 Jul;92(7):961-965. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001574.
4
A Comprehensive Survey of Preclinical Microbiology Curricula Among US Medical Schools.美国医学院校临床前微生物学课程的综合调查。
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Jul 15;63(2):164-8. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw262. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
5
Creating the Medical Schools of the Future.创建未来的医学院校。
Acad Med. 2017 Jan;92(1):16-19. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001160.
6
Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics.主动学习可提高学生在科学、工程和数学领域的表现。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 10;111(23):8410-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111. Epub 2014 May 12.
7
Medical education reimagined: a call to action.医学教育再构想:行动呼吁。
Acad Med. 2013 Oct;88(10):1407-10. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182a368bd.
8
A narrative future for health care.医疗保健的叙事性未来。
Lancet. 2013 Jun 1;381(9881):1886-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61129-0.
9
Mapping a curriculum database to the USMLE Step 1 content outline.将课程数据库映射到 USMLE Step 1 内容大纲。
Med Teach. 2012;34(10):e666-75. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.687477.
10
Calls for reform of medical education by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching: 1910 and 2010.卡内基教学促进基金会对医学教育改革的呼吁:1910 年和 2010 年。
Acad Med. 2010 Feb;85(2):220-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c88449.

多机构合作定义基础医学院课程的核心内容和设计灵活的课程组成部分:对国家课程改革的启示。

A Multi-Institution Collaboration to Define Core Content and Design Flexible Curricular Components for a Foundational Medical School Course: Implications for National Curriculum Reform.

机构信息

S.F. Chen is clinical associate professor of pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. J. Deitz is assistant dean, Stanford Continuing Studies, Stanford University, Stanford, California. At the time of the study and writing, she was director of research and evaluation, Office of Medical Education, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. J.N. Batten is a fourth-year medical student, and at the time of the study and writing, he was a second-year medical student, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. J. DeCoste-Lopez is senior pediatric resident, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford Children's Health, Palo Alto, California. M. Adam is director of health education outreach, Stanford Center for Health Education, Stanford University, Stanford, California. J.A. Alspaugh is professor of medicine and of molecular genetics and microbiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina. M.R. Amieva is associate professor of pediatrics and of microbiology and immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. P. Becker is senior project manager, Information Resources & Technology, Educational Technology Department, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. B. Boslett is assistant professor of medicine, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California. J. Carline is professor of biomedical informatics and medical education, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington. P. Chin-Hong is professor of medicine, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California. D.L. Engle is assistant dean for assessment and evaluation, Office of Curricular Affairs, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina. K.N. Hayward is associate professor of pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington. A. Nevins is clinical associate professor of medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. A. Porwal is managing director, Stanford Center for Health Education, Stanford University, Stanford, California. P.S. Pottinger is associate professor of medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington. B.S. Schwartz is associate professor of medicine, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California. S. Smith is professor of pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington. M. Sow is curriculum program manager, Student Affairs, Office of Medical Education, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. A. Teherani is professor of medicine and education scientist, Center for Faculty Educators, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California. C.G. Prober is senior associate vice provost for health education and professor of pediatrics and of microbiology and immunology, Stanford Center for Health Education, Stanford University, Stanford, California.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2019 Jun;94(6):819-825. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002663.

DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002663
PMID:30801270
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7282480/
Abstract

Medical educators have not reached widespread agreement on core content for a U.S. medical school curriculum. As a first step toward addressing this, five U.S. medical schools formed the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Reimagining Medical Education collaborative to define, create, implement, and freely share core content for a foundational medical school course on microbiology and immunology. This proof-of-concept project involved delivery of core content to preclinical medical students through online videos and class-time interactions between students and facilitators. A flexible, modular design allowed four of the medical schools to successfully implement the content modules in diverse curricular settings. Compared with the prior year, student satisfaction ratings after implementation were comparable or showed a statistically significant improvement. Students who took this course at a time point in their training similar to when the USMLE Step 1 reference group took Step 1 earned equivalent scores on National Board of Medical Examiners-Customized Assessment Services microbiology exam items. Exam scores for three schools ranged from 0.82 to 0.84, compared with 0.81 for the national reference group; exam scores were 0.70 at the fourth school, where students took the exam in their first quarter, two years earlier than the reference group. This project demonstrates that core content for a foundational medical school course can be defined, created, and used by multiple medical schools without compromising student satisfaction or knowledge. This project offers one approach to collaboratively defining core content and designing curricular resources for preclinical medical school education that can be shared.

摘要

医学教育工作者尚未就美国医学院课程的核心内容达成广泛共识。为此,五所美国医学院组成了罗伯特伍德约翰逊基金会重新构想医学教育合作组织,旨在为医学微生物学和免疫学基础课程定义、创建、实施和免费共享核心内容。这一概念验证项目通过在线视频向医预学生传授核心内容,并在学生和教师之间开展课堂互动。灵活的模块化设计使其中四所医学院能够成功地将内容模块融入不同的课程设置中。与前一年相比,实施后的学生满意度评分相当或有显著提高。在培训中与 USMLE Step 1 参考组同时参加该课程的学生在国家医师考试委员会定制评估服务微生物学考试项目中获得了相同的分数。三所学校的考试成绩在 0.82 到 0.84 之间,而全国参考组的成绩为 0.81;第四所学校的考试成绩为 0.70,该校学生在参考组提前两年的第一学期参加了考试。该项目表明,基础医学课程的核心内容可以由多所医学院定义、创建和使用,而不会影响学生的满意度或知识水平。该项目提供了一种合作定义核心内容和设计基础医学教育课程资源的方法,可以进行共享。