• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估一种简单的风险评分,使用产妇特征预测早产子痫前期:一项前瞻性队列研究。

Evaluation of a simple risk score to predict preterm pre-eclampsia using maternal characteristics: a prospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

BJOG. 2019 Jul;126(8):963-970. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15664. Epub 2019 Mar 28.

DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.15664
PMID:30801934
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

(1) To derive a simple risk score for preterm pre-eclampsia based on the model used in the ASPRE trial, and (2) to compare it (i) with the original ASPRE algorithm, (ii) with the NICE Guideline score, and (iii) with and without biochemical and ultrasonic predictors.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Cambridge, UK.

POPULATION OR SAMPLE

4184 nulliparous women from the Pregnancy Outcome Prediction study.

METHODS

Maternal history model coefficients from the ASPRE algorithm were translated into a risk score, preserving the relative weight of each coefficient.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Preterm delivery with a diagnosis of pre-eclampsia.

RESULTS

The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for preterm pre-eclampsia was 0.846 (95% CI 0.787-0.906) for the risk score and 0.854 (95% CI 0.795-0.914) for the original ASPRE algorithm (P = 0.14). In all, 9.1% of women had a risk score of ≥30 and their risk ratio for preterm pre-eclampsia was 13.3 (95% CI 6.3-27.8), sensitivity 57.1% (37.5-74.8%), false-positive rate (1-specificity) 8.8% (8.0-9.7%), and LR 6.5 (4.6-9.1). The score had higher specificity than the NICE Guideline criteria. First trimester levels of PAPP-A and PlGF were not predictive when included in a model with the risk score. In contrast, mean arterial pressure at booking and 20-week uterine artery Doppler were independently associated with preterm pre-eclampsia and the latter modestly increased the AUC (by ~0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

A simple risk score derived from the ASPRE screening study predictive model provided clinically useful prediction of the risk of preterm pre-eclampsia.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

A simple risk score derived from the ASPRE screening study provided clinically useful prediction of the risk of preterm pre-eclampsia.

摘要

目的

(1) 根据 ASPRE 试验中使用的模型,得出一个用于预测早产子痫前期的简单风险评分;(2) 比较该评分与原始 ASPRE 算法、NICE 指南评分的差异,以及是否结合生物化学和超声预测指标。

设计

前瞻性队列研究。

地点

英国剑桥。

人群或样本

来自妊娠结局预测研究的 4184 名初产妇。

方法

将 ASPRE 算法中的母体史模型系数转化为风险评分,保留每个系数的相对权重。

主要观察指标

诊断为子痫前期的早产。

结果

风险评分预测早产子痫前期的 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.846(95%CI 0.787-0.906),原始 ASPRE 算法为 0.854(95%CI 0.795-0.914)(P=0.14)。共有 9.1%的妇女的风险评分≥30,其早产子痫前期的风险比为 13.3(95%CI 6.3-27.8),敏感性为 57.1%(37.5-74.8%),假阳性率(1 特异性)为 8.8%(8.0-9.7%),LR 为 6.5(4.6-9.1)。该评分的特异性高于 NICE 指南标准。将风险评分与 PAPP-A 和 PlGF 的孕早期水平相结合,并未提高预测价值。相比之下,初诊时的平均动脉压和 20 周时的子宫动脉多普勒血流与早产子痫前期独立相关,后者略微提高了 AUC(约 0.02)。

结论

由 ASPRE 筛查研究预测模型衍生的简单风险评分,能为早产子痫前期的风险提供具有临床意义的预测。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a simple risk score to predict preterm pre-eclampsia using maternal characteristics: a prospective cohort study.评估一种简单的风险评分,使用产妇特征预测早产子痫前期:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BJOG. 2019 Jul;126(8):963-970. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15664. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
2
Screening for pre-eclampsia at 11-13 weeks' gestation: use of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A, placental growth factor or both.11-13 孕周筛查子痫前期:使用妊娠相关血浆蛋白-A、胎盘生长因子或两者联合。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;56(3):400-407. doi: 10.1002/uog.22093. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
3
ASPRE trial: risk factors for development of preterm pre-eclampsia despite aspirin prophylaxis.ASPRE 试验:尽管进行了阿司匹林预防,早产子痫前期发展的风险因素。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;58(4):546-552. doi: 10.1002/uog.23668. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
4
External validation of a simple risk score based on the ASPRE trial algorithm for preterm pre-eclampsia considering maternal characteristics in nulliparous pregnant women: a multicentre retrospective cohort study.基于 ASPRE 试验算法的用于预测早产子痫前期的简单风险评分在考虑初产妇产妇特征方面的外部验证:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
BJOG. 2020 Sep;127(10):1210-1215. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16246. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
5
Diagnostic accuracy of first-trimester combined screening for early-onset and preterm pre-eclampsia at 8-10 compared with 11-13 weeks' gestation.早发型和早产子痫前期的孕早期联合筛查在 8-10 周与 11-13 周妊娠时的诊断准确性比较。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jan;57(1):84-90. doi: 10.1002/uog.22071.
6
Angiogenic factors combined with clinical risk factors to predict preterm pre-eclampsia in nulliparous women: a predictive test accuracy study.将血管生成因子与临床危险因素相结合预测初产妇早产子痫前期:一项预测试验准确性研究。
BJOG. 2013 Sep;120(10):1215-23. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12195. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
7
First trimester serum placental growth factor and hyperglycosylated human chorionic gonadotropin are associated with pre-eclampsia: a case control study.孕早期血清胎盘生长因子和高糖基化人绒毛膜促性腺激素与子痫前期相关:一项病例对照研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Nov 25;16(1):378. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1169-4.
8
Prospective evaluation of first-trimester screening strategy for preterm pre-eclampsia and its clinical applicability in China.前瞻性评估早孕期子痫前期筛查策略及其在中国的临床适用性。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;58(4):529-539. doi: 10.1002/uog.23645.
9
ASPRE trial: performance of screening for preterm pre-eclampsia.ASPRE 试验:早产子痫前期筛查的表现。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;50(4):492-495. doi: 10.1002/uog.18816. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
10
ASPRE trial: incidence of preterm pre-eclampsia in patients fulfilling ACOG and NICE criteria according to risk by FMF algorithm.ASPRE 试验:根据 FMF 算法风险,符合 ACOG 和 NICE 标准的患者中早产子痫前期的发生率。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;51(6):738-742. doi: 10.1002/uog.19019. Epub 2018 May 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying Predictor Variables for a Composite Risk Prediction Tool for Gestational Diabetes and Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Modified Delphi Study.识别妊娠期糖尿病和妊娠高血压疾病综合风险预测工具的预测变量:一项改良德尔菲研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jul 8;12(13):1361. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12131361.
2
Machine Learning Algorithms Versus Classical Regression Models in Pre-Eclampsia Prediction: A Systematic Review.机器学习算法与经典回归模型在子痫前期预测中的比较:系统评价。
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2024 Jul;26(7):309-323. doi: 10.1007/s11906-024-01297-1. Epub 2024 May 28.
3
Optimising Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Pregnancy: A Review of Risk Prediction Models Targeting Gestational Diabetes and Hypertensive Disorders.
优化孕期心脏代谢风险因素:针对妊娠期糖尿病和高血压疾病的风险预测模型综述
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022 Feb 10;9(2):55. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9020055.
4
Preeclampsia: Universal Screening or Universal Prevention for Low and Middle-Income Settings?子痫前期:低收入和中等收入地区的普遍筛查还是普遍预防?
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2021 Apr;43(4):334-338. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1729953. Epub 2021 May 12.
5
Characteristics associated with uncomplicated pregnancies in women with obesity: a population-based cohort study.肥胖女性单纯性妊娠的相关特征:一项基于人群的队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Mar 5;21(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03663-2.
6
Prediction of preeclampsia risk in first time pregnant women: Metabolite biomarkers for a clinical test.预测初产妇子痫前期风险:用于临床检测的代谢生物标志物。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 28;15(12):e0244369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244369. eCollection 2020.
7
The outcome of hypertensive disorders with pregnancy.妊娠期高血压疾病的结局
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Mar 26;9(3):1678-1683. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1054_19. eCollection 2020 Mar.
8
Population screening for gestational hypertensive disorders using maternal, fetal and placental characteristics: A population-based prospective cohort study.利用孕产妇、胎儿和胎盘特征进行妊娠期高血压疾病的人群筛查:一项基于人群的前瞻性队列研究。
Prenat Diagn. 2020 May;40(6):746-757. doi: 10.1002/pd.5683. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
9
Prediction of pre-eclampsia in nulliparous women using routinely collected maternal characteristics: a model development and validation study.利用常规收集的产妇特征预测初产妇子痫前期:一项模型建立和验证研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jan 6;20(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2712-x.