Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Department of Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC) Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Department of Surgical Sciences, OIRM Sant'Anna Hospital University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
BJOG. 2020 Sep;127(10):1210-1215. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16246. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
To validate the performance of a first-trimester simple risk score based on the ASPRE trial algorithm for pre-eclampsia.
Multicentre retrospective cohort analysis.
Four Italian hospitals.
Unselected nulliparous women at 11-13 weeks of gestation from January 2014 through to January 2018.
Model performance was evaluated based on discrimination and calibration.
Delivery before 37 weeks of gestation with a diagnosis of pre-eclampsia.
Based on 73 preterm pre-eclampsia cases and 7546 controls (including 101 cases of late pre-eclampsia), the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.659 (95% CI 0.579-0.726). The sensitivity was 32.9% (95% CI 22.1-43.7) at a false-positive rate of 8.8%. The positive likelihood ratio was 3.74 (95% CI 2.67-5.23), the positive predictive value was 3.49% (95% CI 2.12-4.86%) and the negative predictive value was 99.3% (95% CI 99.1-99.5%). The sensitivity and positive likelihood ratio were approximately 40% lower than in the original study. The calibration analysis showed a good agreement between observed and expected risks (P = 0.037). Comparison with the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) algorithm yielded a difference in the area under the curve of 0.084 (P = 0.007).
In our Italian population, the simple risk score had a lower performance than expected for the prediction of preterm pre-eclampsia in nulliparous women. The FMF algorithm applied to the same data set resulted in a better prediction.
Simple risk score predicts preterm pre-eclampsia in Italy.
验证基于 ASPRE 试验算法的子痫前期初产妇简易风险评分的效能。
多中心回顾性队列分析。
意大利四家医院。
2014 年 1 月至 2018 年 1 月,11-13 孕周、未产妇。
评估模型基于区分度和校准度进行表现。
37 孕周前因子痫前期行剖宫产分娩。
基于 73 例早产子痫前期病例和 7546 例对照(包括 101 例晚发型子痫前期),受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.659(95%CI 0.579-0.726)。假阳性率为 8.8%时,敏感性为 32.9%(95%CI 22.1-43.7)。阳性似然比为 3.74(95%CI 2.67-5.23),阳性预测值为 3.49%(95%CI 2.12-4.86%),阴性预测值为 99.3%(95%CI 99.1-99.5%)。与原始研究相比,敏感性和阳性似然比降低了约 40%。校准分析显示,观察到的风险与预期风险之间具有良好的一致性(P=0.037)。与胎儿医学基金会(FMF)算法比较,曲线下面积差异为 0.084(P=0.007)。
在意大利人群中,对于预测初产妇早产子痫前期,简易风险评分的表现逊于预期。应用于同一数据集的 FMF 算法可获得更好的预测效果。
tweeted abstract: 意大利,简易风险评分预测早产子痫前期。