Clinical Sciences Lund, Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, US.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Jun 1;40(8):2529-2545. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24542. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
In vivo mapping of the neurite density with diffusion MRI (dMRI) is a high but challenging aim. First, it is unknown whether all neurites exhibit completely anisotropic ("stick-like") diffusion. Second, the "density" of tissue components may be confounded by non-diffusion properties such as T2 relaxation. Third, the domain of validity for the estimated parameters to serve as indices of neurite density is incompletely explored. We investigated these challenges by acquiring data with "b-tensor encoding" and multiple echo times in brain regions with low orientation coherence and in white matter lesions. Results showed that microscopic anisotropy from b-tensor data is associated with myelinated axons but not with dendrites. Furthermore, b-tensor data together with data acquired for multiple echo times showed that unbiased density estimates in white matter lesions require data-driven estimates of compartment-specific T2 values. Finally, the "stick" fractions of different biophysical models could generally not serve as neurite density indices across the healthy brain and white matter lesions, where outcomes of comparisons depended on the choice of constraints. In particular, constraining compartment-specific T2 values was ambiguous in the healthy brain and had a large impact on estimated values. In summary, estimating neurite density generally requires accounting for different diffusion and/or T2 properties between axons and dendrites. Constrained "index" parameters could be valid within limited domains that should be delineated by future studies.
体内利用扩散 MRI(dMRI)对神经突密度进行映射是一个高但具有挑战性的目标。首先,尚不清楚所有神经突是否都表现出完全各向异性(“棒状”)扩散。其次,组织成分的“密度”可能会受到 T2 弛豫等非扩散特性的混淆。第三,作为神经突密度指标的估计参数的有效域尚未得到充分探索。我们通过在低方向相干性的脑区和白质病变中采集具有“b 张量编码”和多个回波时间的数据来研究这些挑战。结果表明,来自 b 张量数据的微观各向异性与有髓轴突有关,但与树突无关。此外,b 张量数据与多个回波时间采集的数据一起表明,白质病变中无偏密度估计需要针对特定隔室的 T2 值进行数据驱动的估计。最后,不同生物物理模型的“棒”分数通常不能作为整个健康大脑和白质病变中的神经突密度指标,比较结果取决于约束条件的选择。特别是,在健康大脑中,对特定隔室 T2 值的约束是不明确的,并且对估计值有很大影响。总之,估计神经突密度通常需要考虑轴突和树突之间的不同扩散和/或 T2 特性。在未来的研究中应划定的有限域内,受约束的“指数”参数可能是有效的。