Institute for Breath Research, University of Innsbruck, Rathausplatz 4, A-6850 Dornbirn, Austria. Institute of Chemistry, Jan Kochanowski University, Świętokrzyska 15 G, PL-25406 Kielce, Poland.
J Breath Res. 2019 Apr 1;13(3):036001. doi: 10.1088/1752-7163/ab0b8d.
Breath analysis holds great promise for real-time and non-invasive medical diagnosis. Thus, there is a considerable need for simple-in-use and portable analyzers for rapid detection of breath indicators for different diseases in their early stages. Sensor technology meets all of these demands. However, miniaturized breath analyzers require adequate breath sampling methods. In this context, we propose non-contact sampling; namely the collection of breath samples by exhalation from a distance into a miniaturized collector without bringing the mouth into direct contact with the analyzing device. To evaluate this approach different breathing maneuvers have been tested in a real-time regime on a cohort of 23 volunteers using proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry. The breathing maneuvers embraced distinct depths of respiration, exhalation manners, size of the mouth opening and different sampling distances. Two inhalation modes (normal, relaxed breathing and deep breathing) and two exhalation manners (via smaller and wider lips opening) forming four sampling scenarios were selected. A sampling distance of approximately 2 cm was found to be a reasonable trade-off between sample dilution and requirement of no physical contact of the subject with the analyzer. All four scenarios exhibited comparable measurement reproducibility spread of around 10%. For normal, relaxed inspiration both dead-space and end-tidal phases of exhalation lasted approximately 1.5 s for both expiration protocols. Deep inhalation prolongs the end-tidal phase to about 3 s in the case of blowing via a small lips opening, and by 50% when the air is exhaled via a wide one. In conclusion, non-contact breath sampling can be considered as a promising alternative to the existing breath sampling methods, being relatively close to natural spontaneous breathing.
呼气分析在实时和非侵入性医学诊断方面具有广阔的前景。因此,非常需要简单易用且便携的分析仪,以便在疾病早期快速检测不同疾病的呼气标志物。传感器技术满足了所有这些需求。然而,微型呼气分析仪需要适当的呼气采样方法。在这种情况下,我们提出了非接触式采样,即通过远距离呼气将呼吸样本收集到微型收集器中,而无需将口腔与分析设备直接接触。为了评估这种方法,我们使用质子转移反应质谱法在一个由 23 名志愿者组成的队列中实时测试了不同的呼吸动作。这些呼吸动作包括不同的呼吸深度、呼气方式、口腔张开的大小和不同的采样距离。选择了两种吸气模式(正常、放松呼吸和深呼吸)和两种呼气方式(通过较小和较宽的嘴唇张开),形成了四种采样场景。发现大约 2 厘米的采样距离是在样品稀释和分析器与被试者无物理接触要求之间的合理折衷。所有四种方案的测量重复性都相当,约为 10%。对于正常、放松的吸气,两种呼气方案的呼气死腔和终末潮气期持续时间均约为 1.5 秒。深吸气会延长呼气通过小嘴唇开口时的终末潮气期,大约延长 3 秒,而通过宽嘴唇开口呼气时,延长约 50%。总之,非接触式呼气采样可以被认为是现有呼气采样方法的一种有前途的替代方法,与自然的自主呼吸相对接近。