Thompson M S
Am J Public Health. 1986 Apr;76(4):392-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.76.4.392.
Measurements of disease burden focus most often on economic outputs--neglecting effects on quality of life. More comprehensive quantification is based on what people would pay or risk to avoid illness. Many, however, find it difficult to respond thoughtfully to hypothetical questions about what they would pay or risk. With response rates frequently under 50 per cent, the practicality of these methods has been of concern. In this study, specially trained interviewers asked 247 subjects with rheumatoid arthritis how much of their income they would pay and how large a mortal risk they would accept to achieve a hypothetical cure. Ninety-eight per cent of the subjects estimated their maximum acceptable risk (MAR) at an average 27 per cent chance of immediate death. Eighty-four per cent gave plausible responses to the willingness-to-pay (WTP) questions, with a mean WTP of 22 per cent of household income. The aspect of disease most strongly associated with WTP was impairment in activities of daily living; measured pain was most associated with MAR. The response rates achieved indicate the overall feasibility of these methods; the associations of WTP and MAR with other variables suggest systematic consideration of personal circumstances.
疾病负担的衡量通常侧重于经济产出,而忽视了对生活质量的影响。更全面的量化是基于人们为避免疾病愿意支付的费用或愿意承担的风险。然而,许多人发现很难认真回答关于他们愿意支付多少费用或承担何种风险的假设性问题。由于回答率经常低于50%,这些方法的实用性一直受到关注。在这项研究中,经过专门培训的访谈者询问了247名类风湿性关节炎患者,为了实现一种假设的治愈,他们愿意支付多少收入以及愿意接受多大的死亡风险。98%的受试者估计他们的最大可接受风险(MAR)平均为立即死亡的几率27%。84%的受试者对支付意愿(WTP)问题给出了合理的回答,平均支付意愿为家庭收入的22%。与支付意愿最密切相关的疾病方面是日常生活活动受损;测量出的疼痛与最大可接受风险最相关。所达到的回答率表明了这些方法的总体可行性;支付意愿和最大可接受风险与其他变量的关联表明了对个人情况的系统考虑。