Department of Neural Engineering and Biological Interdisciplinary Studies, Institute of Military Cognition and Brain Sciences, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, 27 Taiping Rd, Beijing 100850, People's Republic of China.
J Neural Eng. 2019 Jun;16(3):036011. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab0bfb. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
For intracortical neurophysiological studies, spike sorting is an important procedure to isolate single units for analyzing specific functions. However, whether spike sorting is necessary or not for neural decoding applications is controversial. Several studies showed that using threshold crossings (TC) instead of spike sorting could also achieve a similar satisfactory performance. However, such studies were limited in similar behavioral tasks, and the neural signal source mainly focused on the motor-related cortical regions. It is not certain if this conclusion is applicable to other situations. Therefore, we compared the performance of TC and spike sorting in neural decoding with more comprehensive paradigms and parameters.
Two rhesus macaques implanted with Utah or floating microelectrode arrays (FMAs) in motor or sensory-related cortical regions were trained to perform a motor or a sensory task. Data from each monkey were preprocessed with three different schemes: TC, automatic sorting (AS), and manual sorting (MS). A support vector machine was used as the decoder, and the decoding accuracy was used for evaluating the performance of three preprocessing methods. Different neural signal sources, different decoders, and related parameters and decoding stability were further tested to systematically compare three preprocessing methods.
TC could achieve a similar (-4.5 RMS threshold) or better (-3.0 RMS threshold) decoding performance compared to the other two sorting methods in the motor or sensory tasks even if the neural signal sources or decoder-related parameters were changed. Moreover, TC was much more stable in neural decoding across sessions and robust to changes of threshold.
Our results indicated that spike-firing patterns could be stably extracted through TC from multiple cortices in both motor and sensory neural decoding applications. Considering the stability of TC, it might be more suitable for neural decoding compared to sorting methods.
在皮层内神经生理学研究中,尖峰分类是分离单个单元以分析特定功能的重要步骤。然而,对于神经解码应用程序来说,尖峰分类是否必要存在争议。一些研究表明,使用阈值交叉 (TC) 而不是尖峰分类也可以达到类似的令人满意的性能。然而,这些研究仅限于类似的行为任务,并且神经信号源主要集中在与运动相关的皮质区域。不确定这一结论是否适用于其他情况。因此,我们比较了使用更全面的范式和参数的 TC 和尖峰分类在神经解码中的性能。
两只猕猴在运动或感觉相关的皮质区域植入犹他州或浮动微电极阵列 (FMA),并接受运动或感觉任务的训练。每只猴子的数据都使用三种不同的方案进行预处理:TC、自动分类 (AS) 和手动分类 (MS)。支持向量机作为解码器,解码精度用于评估三种预处理方法的性能。进一步测试了不同的神经信号源、不同的解码器以及相关的参数和解码稳定性,以系统地比较三种预处理方法。
即使改变了神经信号源或解码器相关参数,TC 在运动或感觉任务中也可以达到与其他两种分类方法相似(-4.5 RMS 阈值)或更好的(-3.0 RMS 阈值)解码性能。此外,TC 在跨会话的神经解码中更加稳定,并且对阈值变化具有鲁棒性。
我们的结果表明,通过 TC 可以从运动和感觉神经解码应用中的多个皮质中稳定地提取尖峰发射模式。考虑到 TC 的稳定性,它可能比分类方法更适合神经解码。