• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

民用直升机和螺旋桨驱动飞机噪声的短期烦恼反应:一项实验室实验。

Short-term annoyance reactions to civil helicopter and propeller-driven aircraft noise: A laboratory experiment.

机构信息

Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Laboratory for Acoustics/Noise Control, Überlandstrasse 129, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 Feb;145(2):956. doi: 10.1121/1.5090500.

DOI:10.1121/1.5090500
PMID:30823779
Abstract

Helicopter noise exhibits distinctive acoustical characteristics (e.g., pulsation) compared to noise from propeller-driven aircraft which contains tonal components. Whereas, at comparable sound exposure levels (L), annoyance reactions to these sources might be different, knowledge of potential annoyance differences is scarce. This paper reports a comparison between short-term annoyance reactions to noise from light-weight helicopters and propeller-driven aircraft in a laboratory setup. Stimuli were presented with a 3D sound reproduction system in a listening test facility based on field recordings of takeoffs and landings. Propagation filtering and amplitude changes were carried out to simulate various propagation distances and source levels, covering a reasonable L range from 64 to 85 dB(A) for a stimuli length of 24 s. Fifty-six subjects rated their short-term annoyance reactions on the ICBEN 11-point numerical scale. Associations between design variables (source type, procedure, and L) and short-term annoyance were explored by means of a linear mixed-effect model. L was found to be the major predictor. For the major range of L, no significant difference was found between annoyance to noise from the two aircraft types. Observed level differences at equal annoyance ratings were below 1 dB. Furthermore, helicopter landings were found slightly more annoying than helicopter takeoffs.

摘要

直升机噪声与螺旋桨驱动飞机的噪声相比具有独特的声学特征(例如脉动),后者包含音调成分。然而,在可比的声暴露水平(L)下,这些噪声源的烦扰反应可能不同,但对潜在烦扰差异的了解却很少。本文报告了在实验室环境中对轻型直升机和螺旋桨驱动飞机噪声的短期烦扰反应的比较。刺激物通过基于起飞和着陆现场录音的听力测试设施中的 3D 声音再现系统呈现。进行了传播滤波和幅度变化,以模拟各种传播距离和源级,覆盖了从 64 到 85dB(A)的合理 L 范围,刺激持续时间为 24 秒。56 名受试者根据 ICBEN 11 点数字量表对其短期烦扰反应进行了评分。通过线性混合效应模型探索了设计变量(源类型、程序和 L)与短期烦扰之间的关系。发现 L 是主要预测因素。对于主要的 L 范围,两种飞机类型的噪声引起的烦扰没有显著差异。在相同烦扰等级下观察到的电平差异低于 1dB。此外,直升机着陆被发现比直升机起飞略令人讨厌。

相似文献

1
Short-term annoyance reactions to civil helicopter and propeller-driven aircraft noise: A laboratory experiment.民用直升机和螺旋桨驱动飞机噪声的短期烦恼反应:一项实验室实验。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 Feb;145(2):956. doi: 10.1121/1.5090500.
2
Short-term noise annoyance towards drones and other transportation noise sources: A laboratory study.对无人机及其他交通噪声源的短期噪声烦恼:一项实验室研究。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2024 Oct 1;156(4):2578-2595. doi: 10.1121/10.0032386.
3
The influence of acoustical and non-acoustical factors on short-term annoyance due to aircraft noise in the field - The COSMA study.现场飞机噪声引起的短期烦恼受声学和非声学因素的影响 - COSMA 研究。
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Dec 15;538:834-43. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.064. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
4
Annoyance caused by simultaneous impulse, road-traffic, and aircraft sounds: a quantitative model.由同步脉冲声、道路交通声和飞机声引起的烦恼:一个定量模型。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 Jun;91(6):3330-45. doi: 10.1121/1.402823.
5
Effects of Different Spectral Shapes and Amplitude Modulation of Broadband Noise on Annoyance Reactions in a Controlled Listening Experiment.不同谱形和宽带噪声调幅对控制听力实验中烦扰反应的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 May 19;15(5):1029. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15051029.
6
A survey on exposure-response relationships for road, rail, and aircraft noise annoyance: Differences between continuous and intermittent noise.道路、铁路和航空噪声烦恼的暴露-反应关系调查:连续噪声和间断噪声之间的差异。
Environ Int. 2019 Apr;125:277-290. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.01.043. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
7
Short-term annoyance reactions to stationary and time-varying wind turbine and road traffic noise: A laboratory study.对固定和时变风力涡轮机及道路交通噪声的短期烦恼反应:一项实验室研究。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 May;139(5):2949. doi: 10.1121/1.4949566.
8
Effects of Nocturnal Aircraft Noise and Non-Acoustical Factors on Short-Term Annoyance in Primary School Children.夜间飞机噪声和非声学因素对小学生短期烦恼的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 29;18(13):6959. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136959.
9
Investigation of the relationship between aircraft noise and community annoyance in China.中国飞机噪声与社区烦恼之间关系的调查。
Noise Health. 2012 Mar-Apr;14(57):52-7. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.95132.
10
Short-term annoyance from nocturnal aircraft noise exposure: results of the NORAH and STRAIN sleep studies.短期夜间飞机噪声暴露引起的烦恼:NORAH 和 STRAIN 睡眠研究的结果。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2017 Nov;90(8):765-778. doi: 10.1007/s00420-017-1238-7. Epub 2017 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Human perception and response to sound from unmanned aircraft systems within ambient acoustic environments.人类在周围声学环境中对无人机系统声音的感知与反应。
NPJ Acoust. 2025;1(1):2. doi: 10.1038/s44384-024-00001-6. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
2
Does the Macro-Temporal Pattern of Road Traffic Noise Affect Noise Annoyance and Cognitive Performance?道路交通噪声的宏时模式是否会影响噪声烦恼和认知表现?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 2;19(7):4255. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074255.
3
Room Acoustical Parameters as Predictors of Acoustic Comfort in Outdoor Spaces of Housing Complexes.
作为住宅小区户外空间声学舒适度预测指标的室内声学参数
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 4;11:344. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00344. eCollection 2020.