• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

存在监测偏差情况下对哥伦比亚寨卡病毒传播性的估计。

Estimating transmissibility of Zika virus in Colombia in the presence of surveillance bias.

作者信息

Tsang Tim K, Rojas Diana P, Xu Fei, Xu Yanfang, Zhu Xiaolin, Halloran M Elizabeth, Longini Ira M, Yang Yang

机构信息

World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.

Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

出版信息

Nat Commun. 2025 May 8;16(1):4299. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59655-9.

DOI:10.1038/s41467-025-59655-9
PMID:40341193
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12062338/
Abstract

The 2015-2016 Zika virus outbreak in the Americas presented significant challenges in understanding the transmission dynamics due to substantial reporting biases, as women of reproductive age (15-39 years) were disproportionately represented in the surveillance data when public awareness of relationship between Zika and microcephaly increased. Using national surveillance data from Colombia during July 27, 2015-November 21, 2016, we developed a Bayesian hierarchical modeling framework to reconstruct the true numbers of symptomatic cases and estimate transmission parameters while accounting for differential reporting across age-sex groups. Our model revealed that the detection rate of symptomatic cases among women of reproductive age was 99% (95% CI: 98.7-100), compared to 85.4% (95% CI: 84.7-86.1) in other demographic groups. After correcting for these biases, our results showed that females aged 15-39 years remained 82.8% (95% CI: 80.2-85.2%) more susceptible to Zika symptomatic infection than males of the same age, independent of differential reporting areas. Departments with medium-high altitude, medium-high population density, low coverage of forest, or high dengue incidence from 2011-2015 exhibited greater Zika risk. This study underscores the importance of accounting for surveillance biases in epidemiological studies to better understand factors influencing Zika transmission and to inform disease control and prevention.

摘要

2015 - 2016年寨卡病毒在美洲爆发,由于存在大量报告偏差,在了解传播动态方面面临重大挑战,因为随着公众对寨卡病毒与小头畸形之间关系的认识提高,育龄妇女(15 - 39岁)在监测数据中的占比过高。利用哥伦比亚2015年7月27日至2016年11月21日的国家监测数据,我们开发了一个贝叶斯分层建模框架,以重建有症状病例的真实数量,并在考虑不同年龄 - 性别组报告差异的情况下估计传播参数。我们的模型显示,育龄妇女中有症状病例的检出率为99%(95%置信区间:98.7 - 100),而其他人口群体为85.4%(95%置信区间:84.7 - 86.1)。校正这些偏差后,我们的结果表明,15 - 39岁的女性比同年龄男性感染寨卡病毒有症状感染的易感性仍高82.8%(95%置信区间:80.2 - 85.2%),与报告差异地区无关。海拔中高、人口密度中高、森林覆盖率低或2011 - 2015年登革热发病率高的部门,寨卡病毒风险更大。本研究强调了在流行病学研究中考虑监测偏差对于更好地理解影响寨卡病毒传播的因素以及为疾病控制和预防提供信息的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/12062338/87b8f195ad15/41467_2025_59655_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/12062338/47e7edec73cf/41467_2025_59655_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/12062338/caad506f9b56/41467_2025_59655_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/12062338/64d50d2d9843/41467_2025_59655_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/12062338/ee33c8cc4592/41467_2025_59655_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/12062338/87b8f195ad15/41467_2025_59655_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/12062338/47e7edec73cf/41467_2025_59655_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/12062338/caad506f9b56/41467_2025_59655_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/12062338/64d50d2d9843/41467_2025_59655_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/12062338/ee33c8cc4592/41467_2025_59655_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b562/12062338/87b8f195ad15/41467_2025_59655_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Estimating transmissibility of Zika virus in Colombia in the presence of surveillance bias.存在监测偏差情况下对哥伦比亚寨卡病毒传播性的估计。
Nat Commun. 2025 May 8;16(1):4299. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59655-9.
2
Estimating the numbers of pregnant women infected with Zika virus and infants with congenital microcephaly in Colombia, 2015-2017.估计 2015-2017 年哥伦比亚感染寨卡病毒的孕妇和先天性小头畸形婴儿数量。
J Infect. 2018 Jun;76(6):529-535. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
3
The epidemiology and transmissibility of Zika virus in Girardot and San Andres island, Colombia, September 2015 to January 2016.2015年9月至2016年1月期间,哥伦比亚吉拉尔多和圣安德烈斯岛寨卡病毒的流行病学及传播情况
Euro Surveill. 2016 Jul 14;21(28). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.28.30283.
4
Potential inconsistencies in Zika surveillance data and our understanding of risk during pregnancy.寨卡监测数据的潜在不一致性及其在妊娠期间的风险认识。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Dec 10;12(12):e0006991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006991. eCollection 2018 Dec.
5
A comparison of Zika and dengue outbreaks using national surveillance data in the Dominican Republic.使用多米尼加共和国的国家监测数据对寨卡和登革热疫情进行比较。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Nov 5;12(11):e0006876. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006876. eCollection 2018 Nov.
6
Zika Virus Disease in Colombia - Preliminary Report.哥伦比亚的 Zika 病毒病 - 初步报告。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 6;383(6):e44. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1604037. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
7
Zika Virus Disease and Pregnancy Outcomes in Colombia.哥伦比亚的寨卡病毒病与妊娠结局
N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 6;383(6):537-545. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1911023.
8
Infection-related microcephaly after the 2015 and 2016 Zika virus outbreaks in Brazil: a surveillance-based analysis.巴西 2015 年和 2016 年寨卡病毒疫情后的感染相关小头畸形:基于监测的分析。
Lancet. 2017 Aug 26;390(10097):861-870. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31368-5. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
9
Joint Estimation of Relative Risk for Dengue and Zika Infections, Colombia, 2015-2016.2015-2016 年哥伦比亚登革热和寨卡病毒感染相对风险的联合估计。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2019 Jun;25(6):1118-1126. doi: 10.3201/eid2506.180392.
10
A comprehensive analysis and immunobiology of autoimmune neurological syndromes during the Zika virus outbreak in Cúcuta, Colombia.哥伦比亚库库塔寨卡病毒爆发期间自身免疫性神经综合征的全面分析和免疫生物学研究。
J Autoimmun. 2017 Feb;77:123-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2016.12.007. Epub 2017 Jan 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Geographic Distribution and Temporal Trends of Zika Virus Outbreaks in India (2016-2023): Insights From the Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme Data.印度寨卡病毒疫情的地理分布与时间趋势(2016 - 2023年):综合疾病监测计划数据的见解
Cureus. 2024 Aug 17;16(8):e67068. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67068. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Estimating Zika virus attack rates and risk of Zika virus-associated neurological complications in Colombian capital cities with a Bayesian model.使用贝叶斯模型估计哥伦比亚首都城市的寨卡病毒感染率及寨卡病毒相关神经并发症的风险。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Nov 30;9(11):220491. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220491. eCollection 2022 Nov.
3
Susceptibility to endemic Aedes-borne viruses among pregnant women in Risaralda, Colombia.
哥伦比亚里萨拉尔达省孕妇对地方性伊蚊传播病毒的易感性。
Int J Infect Dis. 2022 Sep;122:832-840. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.07.017. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
4
Effects of changes in temperature on Zika dynamics and control.温度变化对寨卡病毒动态和控制的影响。
J R Soc Interface. 2021 May;18(178):20210165. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2021.0165. Epub 2021 May 5.
5
Estimating incidence of infection from diverse data sources: Zika virus in Puerto Rico, 2016.从多种数据源估算感染发生率:2016 年波多黎各的寨卡病毒。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Mar 30;17(3):e1008812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008812. eCollection 2021 Mar.
6
Co-circulation and misdiagnosis led to underestimation of the 2015-2017 Zika epidemic in the Americas.共同传播和误诊导致 2015-2017 年美洲寨卡疫情被低估。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Mar 1;15(3):e0009208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009208. eCollection 2021 Mar.
7
High Seroprevalence of Antibodies against Arboviruses among Pregnant Women in Rural Caribbean Colombia in the Context of the Zika Virus Epidemic.在寨卡病毒流行背景下,哥伦比亚加勒比地区农村孕妇中虫媒病毒抗体的高血清阳性率
Antibodies (Basel). 2020 Oct 21;9(4):56. doi: 10.3390/antib9040056.
8
Leveraging multiple data types to estimate the size of the Zika epidemic in the Americas.利用多种数据类型估计美洲寨卡疫情的规模。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Sep 28;14(9):e0008640. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008640. eCollection 2020 Sep.
9
Epidemiologic and spatiotemporal trends of Zika Virus disease during the 2016 epidemic in Puerto Rico.波多黎各 2016 年寨卡病毒病疫情的流行病学和时空趋势。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Sep 21;14(9):e0008532. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008532. eCollection 2020 Sep.
10
Comprehensive Immunoprofiling of Pediatric Zika Reveals Key Role for Monocytes in the Acute Phase and No Effect of Prior Dengue Virus Infection.儿科寨卡病毒的全面免疫分析显示单核细胞在急性期的关键作用,以及先前登革热病毒感染无影响。
Cell Rep. 2020 Apr 28;31(4):107569. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107569.