Angier Heather, Ezekiel-Herrera David, Marino Miguel, Hoopes Megan, Jacobs Elizabeth A, DeVoe Jennifer E, Huguet Nathalie
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2019;30(1):116-130. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2019.0011.
This quasi-experimental study evaluated racial/ethnic disparities in health insurance and differences in visits post-versus pre-Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid expansion. We utilized electronic health record data from a population of patients with diabetes aged 19-64 seen in community health centers (CHCs). We used generalized estimating equation Poisson models to estimate incidence rates of insurance type and visits post-(1/1/2014-12/31/2015) versus pre-(1/1/13-12/31/13) ACA, stratified by racial/ethnic group. We assessed difference-in-differences (DD) and difference-in-difference-in-differences (DDD). The relative disparity in uninsured visits increased between Hispanic and non-Hispanic Whites in expansion states (DD=1.93; 95% CI=1.41, 2.64); the magnitude was greater in expansion compared with non-expansion states (DDD=1.84, 95% CI=1.32, 2.56), yet uninsured rates were lower in expansion compared with non-expansion states. We found few changes in visits. Results suggest that the ACA Medicaid expansion increased health insurance coverage and that while some racial/ethnic disparities were improved, some remained.
这项准实验研究评估了医疗保险方面的种族/民族差异,以及《平价医疗法案》(ACA)医疗补助扩大前后就诊情况的差异。我们利用了社区卫生中心(CHC)中19至64岁糖尿病患者群体的电子健康记录数据。我们使用广义估计方程泊松模型来估计按种族/民族分组的保险类型发生率以及ACA实施后(2014年1月1日至2015年12月31日)与实施前(2013年1月1日至2013年12月31日)的就诊率。我们评估了双重差分(DD)和三重差分(DDD)。在扩大医疗补助的州,西班牙裔和非西班牙裔白人之间未参保就诊的相对差距有所增加(DD = 1.93;95%置信区间 = 1.41, 2.64);与未扩大医疗补助的州相比,扩大州的差距幅度更大(DDD = 1.84,95%置信区间 = 1.32, 2.56),不过扩大州的未参保率低于未扩大州。我们发现就诊情况变化不大。结果表明,ACA医疗补助扩大增加了医疗保险覆盖范围,虽然一些种族/民族差异得到改善,但仍有一些差异存在。