• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《平价医疗法案》对2011 - 2012年美国成年糖尿病患者获得医疗服务的影响

Impact of the Affordable Care Act on access to care for US adults with diabetes, 2011-2012.

作者信息

Brown Derek S, McBride Timothy D

机构信息

Brown School, Campus Box 1196, 1 Brookings Dr, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130. Email:

Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 May 7;12:E64. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.140431.

DOI:10.5888/pcd12.140431
PMID:25950571
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4436040/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Lack of health insurance is a barrier to medical care, which may increase the risk of diabetes complications and costs. The objective of this study was to assess the potential of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) of 2010 to improve diabetes care through increased health care access by comparing health care and health outcomes of insured and uninsured people with diabetes.

METHODS

We examined demographics, access to care, health care use, and health care expenditures of adults aged 19 to 64 years with diabetes by using the 2011 and 2012 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Bivariate descriptive statistics comparing insured and uninsured persons were evaluated separately by income above and below 138% of the federal poverty level (FPL), (a threshold for expanded Medicaid eligibility in select states under the ACA) using the t test and proportion and median tests.

RESULTS

Uninsured adults reported poorer access to care than insured adults, such as having a usual source of health care (69.0% vs 89.5% [≤138% FPL], 77.1% vs 94.6% [>138% FPL], both P < .001) and having lower rates of 6 key diabetes preventive care services (P ≤ .05). Insured adults with diabetes had significantly higher health care expenditures than uninsured adults ($13,706 vs $4,367, $10,838 vs $4,419, respectively, both P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Uninsured adults with diabetes had less access to health care and lower levels of preventive care, health care use, and expenditures than insured adults. To the extent that the ACA increases access and coverage, uninsured people with diabetes are likely to significantly increase their health care use, which may lead to reduced incidence of diabetes complications and improved health.

摘要

引言

缺乏医疗保险是获得医疗服务的障碍,这可能会增加糖尿病并发症的风险和成本。本研究的目的是通过比较有保险和无保险的糖尿病患者的医疗服务和健康结果,评估2010年《平价医疗法案》(ACA)通过增加医疗服务可及性来改善糖尿病护理的潜力。

方法

我们使用2011年和2012年医疗支出小组调查,研究了19至64岁患有糖尿病的成年人的人口统计学特征、医疗服务可及性、医疗服务使用情况和医疗支出。使用t检验、比例检验和中位数检验,分别按收入高于和低于联邦贫困水平(FPL)的138%(ACA规定的部分州扩大医疗补助资格的阈值),对有保险和无保险的人群进行双变量描述性统计比较。

结果

无保险的成年人报告的医疗服务可及性比有保险的成年人差,例如有常规医疗服务来源的比例([≤138% FPL]时为69.0%对89.5%,[>138% FPL]时为77.1%对94.6%,P均<.001)以及6项关键糖尿病预防护理服务的使用率较低(P≤.05)。患有糖尿病的有保险成年人的医疗支出显著高于无保险成年人(分别为13,706美元对4,367美元,10,838美元对4,419美元,P均<.001)。

结论

与有保险的成年人相比,无保险的糖尿病成年人获得医疗服务的机会更少,预防护理水平、医疗服务使用情况和支出更低。在ACA增加可及性和覆盖范围的程度上,无保险的糖尿病患者可能会显著增加其医疗服务使用,这可能会导致糖尿病并发症发病率降低和健康状况改善。

相似文献

1
Impact of the Affordable Care Act on access to care for US adults with diabetes, 2011-2012.《平价医疗法案》对2011 - 2012年美国成年糖尿病患者获得医疗服务的影响
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 May 7;12:E64. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.140431.
2
Improvement in preventive care of young adults after the affordable care act: the affordable care act is helping.平价医疗法案实施后,美国年轻人预防保健的改善情况:平价医疗法案正在发挥作用。
JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Dec;168(12):1101-6. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.1691.
3
Access and Quality of Care by Insurance Type for Low-Income Adults Before the Affordable Care Act.《平价医疗法案》实施前低收入成年人按保险类型划分的医疗服务可及性与质量
Am J Public Health. 2016 Aug;106(8):1409-15. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303156. Epub 2016 May 19.
4
Affordable care act: comparison of healthcare indicators among different insurance beneficiaries with new coverage eligibility.平价医疗法案:具有新的保险资格的不同保险受益人的医疗保健指标比较。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr 4;16:114. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1362-1.
5
Insurance Coverage and Treatment Use Under the Affordable Care Act Among Adults With Mental and Substance Use Disorders.《平价医疗法案》下患有精神疾病和物质使用障碍的成年人的保险覆盖范围及治疗利用情况
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Jun 1;68(6):542-548. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600182. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
6
Trends in Uninsured Rates Before and After Medicaid Expansion in Counties Within and Outside of the Diabetes Belt.糖尿病带内及带外县在医疗补助扩张前后的未参保率趋势。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jul;43(7):1449-1455. doi: 10.2337/dc19-0874. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
7
Uninsured and unstably insured: the importance of continuous insurance coverage.未参保及参保不稳定:持续保险覆盖的重要性。
Health Serv Res. 2000 Apr;35(1 Pt 2):187-206.
8
Young adults' health care utilization and expenditures prior to the Affordable Care Act.《平价医疗法案》实施之前年轻人的医疗保健利用情况及支出
J Adolesc Health. 2014 Jun;54(6):663-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
9
The income divide in health care: how the Affordable Care Act will help restore fairness to the U.S. health system.医疗保健领域的收入差距:《平价医疗法案》将如何助力美国医疗体系恢复公平性。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2012 Feb;3:1-24.
10
How the Affordable Care Act Has Improved Americans’ Ability to Buy Health Insurance on Their Own: Findings from the Commonwealth Fund Biennial Health Insurance Survey, 2016.《平价医疗法案》如何提高了美国人自行购买医疗保险的能力:来自英联邦基金会2016年两年一次医疗保险调查的结果
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2017 Jan;5:1-20.

引用本文的文献

1
Diabetes Belt has lower efficiency in providing diabetes preventive care than surrounding counties.糖尿病高发区在提供糖尿病预防护理方面的效率低于周边县。
Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2024 Jun;24(2):200-210. doi: 10.1007/s10742-023-00310-5. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
2
Validating an Electronic Health Record Algorithm for Diabetes Screening Eligibility in the Emergency Department.验证用于急诊科糖尿病筛查资格的电子健康记录算法
West J Emerg Med. 2025 Feb 13;26(3):720-728. doi: 10.5811/westjem.20548.
3
Differences in Medical Expenditures for Men and Women with Diabetes in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 2008-2016.2008 - 2016年医疗支出面板调查中糖尿病男性和女性的医疗支出差异
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2020 Sep 15;1(1):345-353. doi: 10.1089/whr.2020.0050. eCollection 2020.
4
Twenty years of pediatric diabetes surveillance: what do we know and why it matters.20 年儿科糖尿病监测:我们了解了什么,为什么这很重要。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2021 Jul;1495(1):99-120. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14573. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
5
The Affordable Care Act: Effects of Insurance on Diabetes Biomarkers.平价医疗法案:保险对糖尿病生物标志物的影响。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Sep;43(9):2074-2081. doi: 10.2337/dc19-1571. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
6
Demographics and Clinical Profiles of Patients Visiting a Free Clinic in Miami, Florida.佛罗里达州迈阿密一家免费诊所患者的人口统计学和临床概况。
Front Public Health. 2019 Aug 2;7:212. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00212. eCollection 2019.
7
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Health Insurance and Differences in Visit Type for a Population of Patients with Diabetes after Medicaid Expansion.医疗补助扩大后糖尿病患者群体的医疗保险种族/族裔差异及就诊类型差异
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2019;30(1):116-130. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2019.0011.
8
The affordable care act and insurance coverage for persons with diabetes in the United States.《美国平价医疗法案》与糖尿病患者的保险覆盖情况
J Hosp Manag Health Policy. 2018 Apr;2. doi: 10.21037/jhmhp.2018.04.07. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
9
Diabetes Self-Care Behaviors Among Marshallese Adults Living in the United States.居住在美国的马绍尔群岛成年人的糖尿病自我护理行为
J Immigr Minor Health. 2018 Dec;20(6):1500-1507. doi: 10.1007/s10903-017-0683-4.
10
Insights From the National Diabetes Education Program National Diabetes Survey: Opportunities for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support.来自国家糖尿病教育计划全国糖尿病调查的见解:糖尿病自我管理教育与支持的机遇
Diabetes Spectr. 2017 May;30(2):95-100. doi: 10.2337/ds16-0056.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of an intensive lifestyle intervention on use and cost of medical services among overweight and obese adults with type 2 diabetes: the action for health in diabetes.强化生活方式干预对超重和肥胖的2型糖尿病成年人医疗服务使用及费用的影响:糖尿病健康行动研究
Diabetes Care. 2014 Sep;37(9):2548-56. doi: 10.2337/dc14-0093.
2
NIDDK international conference report on diabetes and depression: current understanding and future directions.美国国立糖尿病、消化和肾脏疾病研究所关于糖尿病与抑郁症的国际会议报告:当前认识与未来方向
Diabetes Care. 2014 Aug;37(8):2067-77. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2134.
3
Medicaid increases emergency-department use: evidence from Oregon's Health Insurance Experiment.医疗补助增加了急诊部门的使用:来自俄勒冈州健康保险实验的证据。
Science. 2014 Jan 17;343(6168):263-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1246183. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
4
Understanding why patients of low socioeconomic status prefer hospitals over ambulatory care.理解为什么社会经济地位较低的患者更喜欢选择医院而不是门诊护理。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Jul;32(7):1196-203. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0825.
5
The Oregon experiment--effects of Medicaid on clinical outcomes.俄勒冈实验——医疗补助对临床结果的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2013 May 2;368(18):1713-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1212321.
6
Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2012.2012 年美国糖尿病的经济成本。
Diabetes Care. 2013 Apr;36(4):1033-46. doi: 10.2337/dc12-2625. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
7
THE OREGON HEALTH INSURANCE EXPERIMENT: EVIDENCE FROM THE FIRST YEAR.俄勒冈医疗保险实验:第一年的证据
Q J Econ. 2012 Aug;127(3):1057-1106. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjs020. Epub 2012 May 3.
8
Direct and indirect costs and potential cost savings of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding among obese patients with diabetes.肥胖合并糖尿病患者行腹腔镜可调节胃束带术的直接和间接成本及潜在成本节约。
J Occup Environ Med. 2011 Sep;53(9):1025-9. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e318229aae4.
9
Barriers to diabetes management: patient and provider factors.糖尿病管理障碍:患者和提供者因素。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011 Jul;93(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.02.002. Epub 2011 Mar 5.
10
The missed patient with diabetes: how access to health care affects the detection of diabetes.被漏诊的糖尿病患者:获得医疗保健的机会如何影响糖尿病的检测
Diabetes Care. 2008 Sep;31(9):1748-53. doi: 10.2337/dc08-0572.