• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of extra-corporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) vs methylprednisolone injections in plantar fasciitis.体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)与甲基强的松龙注射治疗足底筋膜炎的疗效比较
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019 Mar-Apr;10(2):401-405. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2018.02.011. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
2
Extra Corporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Local Corticosteroid Injection in the Treatment of Chronic Plantar Fasciitis, a Single Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial.体外冲击波疗法与局部注射皮质类固醇治疗慢性足底筋膜炎的单盲随机临床试验
Pain Med. 2016 Sep;17(9):1722-31. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw113. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
3
Ultrasonography and clinical outcome comparison of extracorporeal shock wave therapy and corticosteroid injections for chronic plantar fasciitis: A randomized controlled trial.体外冲击波疗法与皮质类固醇注射治疗慢性足底筋膜炎的超声检查与临床结果比较:一项随机对照试验
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2018 Mar 1;18(1):47-54.
4
Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Versus Platelet Rich Plasma Injection in Patients of Chronic Plantar Fasciitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial From a Tertiary Center of Eastern India.慢性足底筋膜炎患者的体外冲击波疗法与富血小板血浆注射:来自印度东部一家三级中心的随机对照试验
Cureus. 2023 Jan 31;15(1):e34430. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34430. eCollection 2023 Jan.
5
Comparison of autologous conditioned plasma injection, extracorporeal shockwave therapy, and conventional treatment for plantar fasciitis: a randomized trial.自体条件血浆注射、体外冲击波疗法与常规治疗足底筋膜炎的比较:一项随机试验。
PM R. 2013 Dec;5(12):1035-43. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.08.590. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
6
Treatment Outcomes of Corticosteroid Injection and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy as Two Primary Therapeutic Methods for Acute Plantar Fasciitis: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.皮质类固醇注射和体外冲击波疗法作为急性足底筋膜炎两种主要治疗方法的治疗结果:一项前瞻性随机临床试验
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015 Nov-Dec;54(6):1047-52. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2015.04.026. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
7
Long Term Effectiveness of ESWT in Plantar Fasciitis in Amateur Runners.体外冲击波疗法对业余跑步者足底筋膜炎的长期疗效
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 24;11(23):6926. doi: 10.3390/jcm11236926.
8
Platelet-rich plasma or extracorporeal shockwave therapy for plantar fasciitis.富血小板血浆或体外冲击波疗法治疗足底筋膜炎。
Int J Burns Trauma. 2021 Feb 15;11(1):1-8. eCollection 2021.
9
Comparison of extracorporeal shock wave therapy with botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of plantar fasciitis.体外冲击波疗法与A型肉毒毒素治疗足底筋膜炎的比较。
Disabil Rehabil. 2016 Oct;38(21):2114-21. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1114036. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
10
Pain relief and functional improvement provided by extracorporeal shock wave therapy in plantar fasciitis is better than corticosteroid injection and kinesio taping: A randomized trial.体外冲击波疗法对足底筋膜炎的疼痛缓解和功能改善效果优于皮质类固醇注射和肌内效贴布:一项随机试验。
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Aug 23;69(4):469-478. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2023.12824. eCollection 2023 Dec.

引用本文的文献

1
Response to Letter to the Editor: Ultrasound-guided injections for plantar fasciitis.对编辑来信的回复:超声引导下注射治疗足底筋膜炎
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2025 May 27;71(2):262. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2025.16886. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Are Extracorporeal Shock Waves Just a Therapeutic Tool?体外冲击波只是一种治疗工具吗?
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Oct 31;14(21):2440. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14212440.
3
Pain relief and functional improvement provided by extracorporeal shock wave therapy in plantar fasciitis is better than corticosteroid injection and kinesio taping: A randomized trial.体外冲击波疗法对足底筋膜炎的疼痛缓解和功能改善效果优于皮质类固醇注射和肌内效贴布:一项随机试验。
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Aug 23;69(4):469-478. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2023.12824. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis in Patients with Calcaneal Spurs: Radiofrequency Thermal Ablation or Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy?跟骨骨刺患者足底筋膜炎的治疗:射频热消融还是体外冲击波疗法?
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 13;12(20):6503. doi: 10.3390/jcm12206503.
5
Do the presence, size, and shape of plantar calcaneal spurs have any significance in terms of pain and treatment outcomes in patients with plantar fasciitis?足底跟骨骨刺的存在、大小和形状在足底筋膜炎患者的疼痛和治疗效果方面有何意义?
Turk J Med Sci. 2023 Feb;53(1):413-419. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5598. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
6
Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (ESWT) Alleviates Pain, Enhances Erectile Function and Improves Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome.体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)可减轻慢性前列腺炎/慢性盆腔疼痛综合征患者的疼痛、增强勃起功能并改善生活质量。
J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 16;10(16):3602. doi: 10.3390/jcm10163602.
7
The efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave for chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.体外冲击波治疗慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛疾病的疗效:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Apr;99(16):e19705. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019705.

本文引用的文献

1
Plantar Fasciitis-A Comparison of Treatment with Intralesional Steroids versus Platelet-Rich Plasma .足底筋膜炎——病灶内注射类固醇与富血小板血浆治疗的比较
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2017 Nov;107(6):490-496. doi: 10.7547/15-125. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
2
Extra Corporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Local Corticosteroid Injection in the Treatment of Chronic Plantar Fasciitis, a Single Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial.体外冲击波疗法与局部注射皮质类固醇治疗慢性足底筋膜炎的单盲随机临床试验
Pain Med. 2016 Sep;17(9):1722-31. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw113. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
3
The effectiveness of corticosteroid injection in the treatment of plantar fasciitis.皮质类固醇注射治疗足底筋膜炎的有效性。
Singapore Med J. 2015 Aug;56(8):423-32. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2015118.
4
Plantar fascia calcification a sequelae of corticosteroid injection in the treatment of recalcitrant plantar fasciitis.足底筋膜钙化是皮质类固醇注射治疗顽固性足底筋膜炎的后遗症。
BMJ Case Rep. 2013 Aug 16;2013:bcr2013200303. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2013-200303.
5
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy is effective in treating chronic plantar fasciitis: a meta-analysis of RCTs.体外冲击波疗法治疗慢性足底筋膜炎有效:RCT 的荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Nov;471(11):3645-52. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3132-2. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
6
Plantar fasciitis.足底筋膜炎
J Res Med Sci. 2012 Aug;17(8):799-804.
7
A comparison of botulinum toxin a and intralesional steroids for the treatment of plantar fasciitis: a randomized, double-blinded study.A 与局部类固醇治疗足底筋膜炎的比较:一项随机、双盲研究。
Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Jan;34(1):8-14. doi: 10.1177/1071100712460215.
8
Incidence of plantar fascia ruptures following corticosteroid injection.皮质类固醇注射后足底筋膜破裂的发生率。
Foot Ankle Spec. 2010 Dec;3(6):335-7. doi: 10.1177/1938640010378530. Epub 2010 Sep 3.
9
The incidence of plantar fasciitis in the United States military.美国军队中足底筋膜炎的发病率。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Dec;91(12):2867-72. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00257.
10
The real risks of steroid injection for plantar fasciitis, with a review of conservative therapies.足底筋膜炎行类固醇注射治疗的真实风险,并回顾保守治疗方法。
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2009 Mar;2(1):3-9. doi: 10.1007/s12178-008-9036-1. Epub 2008 Sep 19.

体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)与甲基强的松龙注射治疗足底筋膜炎的疗效比较

Effectiveness of extra-corporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) vs methylprednisolone injections in plantar fasciitis.

作者信息

Mishra Bibhuti Nath, Poudel Rishi Ram, Banskota Bibek, Shrestha Babu Kaji, Banskota Ashok Kumar

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Nobel Medical College Teaching Hospital, Kanchanbari, Biratnagar, Nepal.

Department of Orthopaedics & Trauma, B&B Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.

出版信息

J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019 Mar-Apr;10(2):401-405. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2018.02.011. Epub 2018 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcot.2018.02.011
PMID:30828215
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6383071/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In Plantar Fasciitis, the main concern of the patients is the pain that disturbs their day to day activities. Different modalities of treatments are being used for its pain management. This study seeks to investigate and compare decrease in level of pain following treatment with Methylprednisolone injections (DMP) Vs Extra-Corporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) in plantar fasciitis.

METHODS

This prospective comparative non randomized study was conducted in 60 patients of any age presenting with Plantar Fasciitis at B&B Hospital, Kathmandu. Patients were divided into 2 groups (30 each) based on patients preference. Methylprednisolone injection was given to one group and another group received ESWT. Follow up of both groups were carried out at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months and the outcome was measured with Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS). Statistical analysis wasdone using SPSS software, version 13. Chi-square and Independent -test were applied to look for significant variations in outcome.

RESULTS

Follow-up at 6 weeks revealed 26 (86.7%) patients attaining VAS < 5 in ESWT group in comparison to 16 (53.3%) patients of DMP group (p = 0.005). At the end of 6 months, 5 patients in DPM group still had significant pain (VAS ≥ 5) compared to 2 patients in ESWT group (p = 0.02). However 11 patients of DMP group and 23 of ESWT group received single episode of treatment only and had persistent symptomatic pain relief (VAS < 5) during all follow ups at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Plantar fasciitis was more prevalent in overweight population and females. Significant improvement in pain was observed with both ESWT and DMP Injections. However, ESWT was found to be more effective than DMP Injections for treatment of Plantar Fasciitis.

摘要

引言

在足底筋膜炎中,患者主要关心的是困扰其日常活动的疼痛。目前采用了不同的治疗方式来管理这种疼痛。本研究旨在调查和比较在足底筋膜炎患者中,使用甲泼尼龙注射(DMP)与体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)治疗后疼痛程度的降低情况。

方法

这项前瞻性比较非随机研究在加德满都B&B医院对60例患有足底筋膜炎的任何年龄患者进行。根据患者的偏好将患者分为两组(每组30例)。一组接受甲泼尼龙注射,另一组接受ESWT治疗。两组均在6周、3个月和6个月时进行随访,并使用视觉模拟疼痛量表(VAS)测量结果。使用SPSS软件13版进行统计分析。应用卡方检验和独立样本t检验来寻找结果中的显著差异。

结果

6周随访时,ESWT组有26例(86.7%)患者VAS<5,而DMP组有16例(53.3%)患者VAS<5(p = 0.005)。在6个月末,DPM组有5例患者仍有明显疼痛(VAS≥5),而ESWT组有2例患者(p = 0.02)。然而,DMP组有11例患者和ESWT组有23例患者仅接受了单次治疗,并且在6周、3个月和6个月的所有随访期间均有持续的症状性疼痛缓解(VAS<5)(p = 0.004)。

结论

足底筋膜炎在超重人群和女性中更为普遍。ESWT和DMP注射治疗后疼痛均有显著改善。然而,发现ESWT在治疗足底筋膜炎方面比DMP注射更有效。