为什么电车难题对自动驾驶汽车的伦理学很重要。
Why Trolley Problems Matter for the Ethics of Automated Vehicles.
机构信息
Department of Philosophy, University of Bristol, Cotham House, Bristol, BS6 6JL, UK.
出版信息
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Feb;26(1):293-307. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00096-1. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
Abstract
This paper argues against the view that trolley cases are of little or no relevance to the ethics of automated vehicles. Four arguments for this view are outlined and rejected: the Not Going to Happen Argument, the Moral Difference Argument, the Impossible Deliberation Argument and the Wrong Question Argument. In making clear where these arguments go wrong, a positive account is developed of how trolley cases can inform the ethics of automated vehicles.
摘要
本文反对认为电车难题与自动驾驶车辆的伦理道德几乎没有关系或毫无关系的观点。本文概述并驳斥了支持这一观点的四个论据：不会发生论证、道德差异论证、不可能的审议论证和错误问题论证。通过明确这些论证的错误之处，本文提出了一个积极的观点，即电车难题如何为自动驾驶车辆的伦理道德提供信息。
相似文献
1
Why Trolley Problems Matter for the Ethics of Automated Vehicles.为什么电车难题对自动驾驶汽车的伦理学很重要。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Feb;26(1):293-307. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00096-1. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
2
ETHICS. Our driverless dilemma.伦理道德。我们的无人驾驶困境。
Science. 2016 Jun 24;352(6293):1514-5. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf9534.
3
The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles.自动驾驶汽车的社会困境。
Science. 2016 Jun 24;352(6293):1573-6. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf2654.
4
Human Decisions in Moral Dilemmas are Largely Described by Utilitarianism: Virtual Car Driving Study Provides Guidelines for Autonomous Driving Vehicles.在道德困境中，人类的决策在很大程度上由功利主义描述：虚拟汽车驾驶研究为自动驾驶车辆提供了指导方针。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Apr;25(2):399-418. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0020-x. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
5
Justice and the Possibility of Good Moralism in Bioethics.生物伦理学中的正义与良善道德主义的可能性
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2019 Apr;28(2):236-263. doi: 10.1017/S0963180119000082.
6
Responsibility for crashes of autonomous vehicles: an ethical analysis.自动驾驶车辆碰撞事故的责任：伦理分析
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Jun;21(3):619-30. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9565-5. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
7
The Moral Machine experiment.道德机器实验。
Nature. 2018 Nov;563(7729):59-64. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0637-6. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
8
Nursing and euthanasia: a review of argument-based ethics literature.护理与安乐死：基于论证的伦理文献综述
Nurs Ethics. 2009 Jul;16(4):466-86. doi: 10.1177/0969733009104610.
9
Solving the Single-Vehicle Self-Driving Car Trolley Problem Using Risk Theory and Vehicle Dynamics.运用风险理论和车辆动力学解决单车自动驾驶电车问题
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Feb;26(1):431-449. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00102-6. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
10
Two concepts of empirical ethics.经验伦理学的两个概念。
Bioethics. 2009 May;23(4):202-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01708.x.
引用本文的文献
1
Humans, machines, and double standards? The moral evaluation of the actions of autonomous vehicles, anthropomorphized autonomous vehicles, and human drivers in road-accident dilemmas.人类、机器与双重标准？道路事故困境中自动驾驶汽车、拟人化自动驾驶汽车及人类驾驶员行为的道德评估
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 4;13:1052729. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1052729. eCollection 2022.
2
Self-protective and self-sacrificing preferences of pedestrians and passengers in moral dilemmas involving autonomous vehicles.行人与乘客在涉及自动驾驶汽车的道德困境中的自我保护与自我牺牲偏好。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 23;16(12):e0261673. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261673. eCollection 2021.
3
From driverless dilemmas to more practical commonsense tests for automated vehicles.从无人驾驶的困境到更实用的自动化车辆常识性测试。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Mar 16;118(11). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2010202118.
4
Ethical Decision Making in Autonomous Vehicles: The AV Ethics Project.自动驾驶汽车中的伦理决策：AV 伦理项目。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Dec;26(6):3285-3312. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00272-8. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
5
Moral Judgements on the Actions of Self-Driving Cars and Human Drivers in Dilemma Situations From Different Perspectives.不同视角下对自动驾驶汽车和人类驾驶员在两难情境中行为的道德评判
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 1;10:2415. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02415. eCollection 2019.
本文引用的文献
1
The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles.自动驾驶汽车的社会困境。
Science. 2016 Jun 24;352(6293):1573-6. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf2654.
2
Killing, letting die, and the trolley problem.杀人、听任死亡与电车难题。
Monist. 1976 Apr;59(2):204-17. doi: 10.5840/monist197659224.
Zotero 插件