• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面向自动驾驶接管过程中行为的计算模拟:实证和建模文献综述。

Toward Computational Simulations of Behavior During Automated Driving Takeovers: A Review of the Empirical and Modeling Literatures.

机构信息

Texas A&M University, College Station, USA.

Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, Blacksburg, USA.

出版信息

Hum Factors. 2019 Jun;61(4):642-688. doi: 10.1177/0018720819829572. Epub 2019 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1177/0018720819829572
PMID:30830804
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This article provides a review of empirical studies of automated vehicle takeovers and driver modeling to identify influential factors and their impacts on takeover performance and suggest driver models that can capture them.

BACKGROUND

Significant safety issues remain in automated-to-manual transitions of vehicle control. Developing models and computer simulations of automated vehicle control transitions may help designers mitigate these issues, but only if accurate models are used. Selecting accurate models requires estimating the impact of factors that influence takeovers.

METHOD

Articles describing automated vehicle takeovers or driver modeling research were identified through a systematic approach. Inclusion criteria were used to identify relevant studies and models of braking, steering, and the complete takeover process for further review.

RESULTS

The reviewed studies on automated vehicle takeovers identified several factors that significantly influence takeover time and post-takeover control. Drivers were found to respond similarly between manual emergencies and automated takeovers, albeit with a delay. The findings suggest that existing braking and steering models for manual driving may be applicable to modeling automated vehicle takeovers.

CONCLUSION

Time budget, repeated exposure to takeovers, silent failures, and handheld secondary tasks significantly influence takeover time. These factors in addition to takeover request modality, driving environment, non-handheld secondary tasks, level of automation, trust, fatigue, and alcohol significantly impact post-takeover control. Models that capture these effects through evidence accumulation were identified as promising directions for future work.

APPLICATION

Stakeholders interested in driver behavior during automated vehicle takeovers may use this article to identify starting points for their work.

摘要

目的

本文回顾了自动驾驶接管和驾驶员建模的实证研究,以确定影响因素及其对接管性能的影响,并提出能够捕捉这些因素的驾驶员模型。

背景

在自动驾驶向手动驾驶的车辆控制转换过程中,仍存在重大安全问题。开发自动驾驶控制转换的模型和计算机模拟可能有助于设计人员缓解这些问题,但前提是使用准确的模型。选择准确的模型需要估计影响接管的因素的影响。

方法

通过系统方法确定描述自动驾驶接管或驾驶员建模研究的文章。使用纳入标准来识别相关的研究和制动、转向以及完整接管过程的模型,以进行进一步审查。

结果

对自动驾驶接管的回顾性研究确定了几个显著影响接管时间和接管后控制的因素。研究发现,驾驶员在手动紧急情况下和自动驾驶接管中的反应相似,尽管存在延迟。研究结果表明,现有的手动驾驶制动和转向模型可能适用于自动驾驶接管的建模。

结论

时间预算、重复接触接管、无声故障和手持次要任务显著影响接管时间。除接管请求模式、驾驶环境、非手持次要任务、自动化程度、信任、疲劳和酒精之外,这些因素还显著影响接管后的控制。通过证据积累来捕捉这些影响的模型被确定为未来工作的有前途的方向。

应用

对自动驾驶接管期间驾驶员行为感兴趣的利益相关者可以使用本文来确定他们工作的起点。

相似文献

1
Toward Computational Simulations of Behavior During Automated Driving Takeovers: A Review of the Empirical and Modeling Literatures.面向自动驾驶接管过程中行为的计算模拟:实证和建模文献综述。
Hum Factors. 2019 Jun;61(4):642-688. doi: 10.1177/0018720819829572. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
2
A Computational Cognitive Model of Driver Response Time for Scheduled Freeway Exiting Takeovers in Conditionally Automated Vehicles.条件自动化车辆高速公路出口接管计划中驾驶员响应时间的计算认知模型。
Hum Factors. 2024 May;66(5):1583-1599. doi: 10.1177/00187208221143028. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
3
Behavioral Changes to Repeated Takeovers in Highly Automated Driving: Effects of the Takeover-Request Design and the Nondriving-Related Task Modality.高度自动驾驶中多次接管的行为变化:接管请求设计和非驾驶相关任务模式的影响。
Hum Factors. 2019 Aug;61(5):839-849. doi: 10.1177/0018720818814963. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
4
Modeling takeover behavior in level 3 automated driving via a structural equation model: Considering the mediating role of trust.通过结构方程模型对 3 级自动驾驶接管行为进行建模:考虑信任的中介作用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Jul;157:106156. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106156. Epub 2021 May 3.
5
A Bayesian Regression Analysis of the Effects of Alert Presence and Scenario Criticality on Automated Vehicle Takeover Performance.关于警报存在和场景关键性对自动驾驶车辆接管性能影响的贝叶斯回归分析。
Hum Factors. 2023 Mar;65(2):288-305. doi: 10.1177/00187208211010004. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
6
Effects of Non-Driving Related Task Modalities on Takeover Performance in Highly Automated Driving.驾驶相关任务模式对高度自动化驾驶接管性能的影响。
Hum Factors. 2018 Sep;60(6):870-881. doi: 10.1177/0018720818768199. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
7
Where drivers are looking at during takeover: Implications for safe takeovers during conditionally automated driving.驾驶员在接管时的注视点:对条件自动化驾驶中安全接管的启示。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2023;24(7):599-608. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2023.2224910. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
8
Effects of unreliable automation, non-driving related task, and takeover time budget on drivers' takeover performance and workload.不可靠自动化、非驾驶相关任务以及接管时间预算对驾驶员接管性能和工作量的影响。
Ergonomics. 2023 Feb;66(2):182-197. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2022.2069868. Epub 2022 May 2.
9
Noncritical State Transitions During Conditionally Automated Driving on German Freeways: Effects of Non-Driving Related Tasks on Takeover Time and Takeover Quality.条件自动驾驶高速公路上的非关键状态转换:非驾驶相关任务对接管时间和接管质量的影响。
Hum Factors. 2019 Jun;61(4):596-613. doi: 10.1177/0018720818824002. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
10
Olfactory Facilitation of Takeover Performance in Highly Automated Driving.嗅觉促进高度自动化驾驶中的接管性能。
Hum Factors. 2021 Jun;63(4):553-564. doi: 10.1177/0018720819893137. Epub 2020 Jan 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Multiple entropy fusion predicts driver fatigue using forehead EEG.多熵融合利用前额脑电图预测驾驶员疲劳。
Front Neurosci. 2025 Jun 13;19:1567146. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1567146. eCollection 2025.
2
ViE-Take: A Vision-Driven Multi-Modal Dataset for Exploring the Emotional Landscape in Takeover Safety of Autonomous Driving.ViE-Take:一个用于探索自动驾驶接管安全中情感状况的视觉驱动多模态数据集。
Research (Wash D C). 2025 Mar 14;8:0603. doi: 10.34133/research.0603. eCollection 2025.
3
Triboelectric sensor gloves for real-time behavior identification and takeover time adjustment in conditionally automated vehicles.
用于条件自动驾驶车辆实时行为识别和接管时间调整的摩擦电传感器手套。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jan 27;16(1):1080. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-56169-2.
4
Post-Takeover Proficiency in Conditionally Automated Driving: Understanding Stabilization Time with Driving and Physiological Signals.接管后条件自动驾驶熟练度:通过驾驶和生理信号理解稳定时间。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 May 17;24(10):3193. doi: 10.3390/s24103193.
5
Self-evaluation of automated vehicles based on physics, state-of-the-art motion prediction and user experience.基于物理学、先进运动预测和用户体验的自动驾驶车辆自我评估。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 4;13(1):12692. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39811-1.
6
Reliable and transparent in-vehicle agents lead to higher behavioral trust in conditionally automated driving systems.可靠且透明的车内代理会提高对有条件自动驾驶系统的行为信任度。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 18;14:1121622. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1121622. eCollection 2023.
7
Happiness and high reliability develop affective trust in in-vehicle agents.幸福感和高可靠性会培养对车载智能体的情感信任。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 14;14:1129294. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1129294. eCollection 2023.
8
Driver Visual Attention Before and After Take-Over Requests During Automated Driving on Public Roads.驾驶员在公共道路自动驾驶时接管请求前后的视觉注意力。
Hum Factors. 2024 Feb;66(2):336-347. doi: 10.1177/00187208221093863. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
9
Optimal Time Intervals in Two-Stage Takeover Warning Systems With Insight Into the Drivers' Neuroticism Personality.两阶段收购预警系统中的最优时间间隔:洞察驾驶员的神经质人格
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 8;12:601536. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.601536. eCollection 2021.
10
Predicting takeover response to silent automated vehicle failures.预测接管对无声自动驾驶车辆故障的反应。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 30;15(11):e0242825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242825. eCollection 2020.