• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过结构方程模型对 3 级自动驾驶接管行为进行建模:考虑信任的中介作用。

Modeling takeover behavior in level 3 automated driving via a structural equation model: Considering the mediating role of trust.

机构信息

School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China; Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data and Brain Computing, Beijing Key Laboratory for Cooperative Vehicle Infrastructure Systems and Safety Control, Beijing, 100191, China.

School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China; Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data and Brain Computing, Beijing Key Laboratory for Cooperative Vehicle Infrastructure Systems and Safety Control, Beijing, 100191, China.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Jul;157:106156. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106156. Epub 2021 May 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2021.106156
PMID:33957474
Abstract

The takeover process in level 3 automated driving determines the controllability of the functions of automated vehicles and thereby traffic safety. In this study, we attempted to explain drivers' takeover performance variation in a level 3 automated vehicle in consideration of the effects of trust, system characteristics, environmental characteristics, and driver characteristics with a structural equation model. The model was built by incorporating drivers' takeover time and quality as endogenous variables. A theoretical framework of the model was hypothesized on the basis of the ACT-R cognitive architecture and relevant research results. The validity of the model was confirmed using data collected from 136 driving simulator samples under the condition of voluntary non-driving-related tasks. Results revealed that takeover time budget was the most critical factor in promoting the safety and stability of takeover process, which, together with traffic density, drivers' age and manual driving experience, determined drivers' takeover quality directly. In addition, the pre-existing experience with an automated system or a similar technology and self-confidence of the driver, as well as takeover time budget, strongly influenced the takeover time directly. Apart from the direct effects mentioned above, trust, as an intermediary variable, explained a major portion of the variance in takeover time. Theoretically, these findings suggest that takeover behavior could be comprehensively evaluated from the two dimensions of takeover time and quality through the combination of trust, driver characteristics, environmental characteristics, and vehicle characteristics. The influence mechanism of the above factors is complex and multidimensional. In addition to the form of direct influence, trust, as an intermediary variable, could reflect the internal mechanism of the takeover behavior variation. Practically, the findings emphasize the crucial role of trust in the change in takeover behavior through the dimensions of subjective trust level and monitoring strategy, which may provide new insights into the function design of takeover process.

摘要

三级自动驾驶接管过程决定了自动驾驶汽车功能的可控性,从而影响交通安全。本研究试图在考虑信任、系统特性、环境特性和驾驶员特性的基础上,用结构方程模型解释三级自动驾驶车辆驾驶员接管性能的变化。该模型将驾驶员的接管时间和质量作为内生变量构建而成。在 ACT-R 认知架构和相关研究结果的基础上,对模型的理论框架进行了假设。通过在非驾驶相关任务的自愿驾驶模拟器样本中收集的 136 个样本数据,验证了模型的有效性。结果表明,接管时间预算是促进接管过程安全稳定的最关键因素,它与交通密度、驾驶员年龄和手动驾驶经验一起直接决定了驾驶员的接管质量。此外,驾驶员对自动化系统或类似技术的预先经验和自信心,以及接管时间预算,直接强烈影响接管时间。除了上述直接影响外,信任作为中介变量,直接解释了接管时间变化的大部分差异。从理论上讲,这些发现表明可以通过信任、驾驶员特征、环境特征和车辆特征的组合,从接管时间和质量两个维度来综合评估接管行为。上述因素的影响机制是复杂和多维的。除了直接影响的形式外,信任作为中介变量,还可以反映接管行为变化的内在机制。从实际应用的角度来看,研究结果强调了信任在接管行为变化中的关键作用,通过主观信任水平和监测策略这两个维度,这可能为接管过程的功能设计提供新的思路。

相似文献

1
Modeling takeover behavior in level 3 automated driving via a structural equation model: Considering the mediating role of trust.通过结构方程模型对 3 级自动驾驶接管行为进行建模:考虑信任的中介作用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Jul;157:106156. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106156. Epub 2021 May 3.
2
Effects of unreliable automation, non-driving related task, and takeover time budget on drivers' takeover performance and workload.不可靠自动化、非驾驶相关任务以及接管时间预算对驾驶员接管性能和工作量的影响。
Ergonomics. 2023 Feb;66(2):182-197. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2022.2069868. Epub 2022 May 2.
3
Toward Computational Simulations of Behavior During Automated Driving Takeovers: A Review of the Empirical and Modeling Literatures.面向自动驾驶接管过程中行为的计算模拟:实证和建模文献综述。
Hum Factors. 2019 Jun;61(4):642-688. doi: 10.1177/0018720819829572. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
4
Psychophysiological responses to takeover requests in conditionally automated driving.条件自动化驾驶中接管请求的心理生理响应。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Dec;148:105804. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105804. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
5
Sleep in highly automated driving: Takeover performance after waking up.高度自动化驾驶中的睡眠:唤醒后的接管性能。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Sep;144:105617. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105617. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
6
How Can the Trust-Change Direction be Measured and Identified During Takeover Transitions in Conditionally Automated Driving? Using Physiological Responses and Takeover-Related Factors.在有条件自动驾驶接管过渡期间,如何衡量和识别信任转变方向?使用生理反应和接管相关因素。
Hum Factors. 2024 Apr;66(4):1276-1301. doi: 10.1177/00187208221143855. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
7
Prior Familiarization With Takeover Requests Affects Drivers' Takeover Performance and Automation Trust.事先熟悉接管请求会影响驾驶员的接管性能和对自动化的信任。
Hum Factors. 2017 May;59(3):457-470. doi: 10.1177/0018720816678714. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
8
An analysis of physiological responses as indicators of driver takeover readiness in conditionally automated driving.分析生理反应作为有条件自动驾驶中驾驶员接管准备程度的指标。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Feb;195:107372. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107372. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
9
Driving Aggressively or Conservatively? Investigating the Effects of Automated Vehicle Interaction Type and Road Event on Drivers' Trust and Preferred Driving Style.激进驾驶还是保守驾驶?研究自动驾驶车辆交互类型和道路事件对驾驶员信任和偏好驾驶风格的影响。
Hum Factors. 2024 Sep;66(9):2166-2178. doi: 10.1177/00187208231181199. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
10
Driver behavior and mental workload for takeover safety in automated driving: ACT-R prediction modeling approach.自动驾驶接管安全中的驾驶员行为和心理负荷:ACT-R 预测建模方法。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2024;25(3):381-389. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2023.2300640. Epub 2024 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
A Computational Cognitive Model of Driver Response Time for Scheduled Freeway Exiting Takeovers in Conditionally Automated Vehicles.条件自动化车辆高速公路出口接管计划中驾驶员响应时间的计算认知模型。
Hum Factors. 2024 May;66(5):1583-1599. doi: 10.1177/00187208221143028. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
2
A Take-Over Performance Evaluation Model for Automated Vehicles from Automated to Manual Driving.自动驾驶到手动驾驶的接管性能评估模型
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Apr 15;2022:3160449. doi: 10.1155/2022/3160449. eCollection 2022.