• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用带有一体式固定螺钉的颈椎前路椎间融合器治疗颈椎间盘疾病。

The use of anterior cervical interbody spacer with integrated fixation screws for management of cervical disc disease.

作者信息

El Baz Ehab Adel, Sultan Ahmed Maher, Barakat Ahmed Samir, Koptan Wael, ElMiligui Yasser, Shaker Hesham

机构信息

Agouza Armed Forces Spine Surgery Center, Farid Shawky Street, Giza, Egypt.

Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Kasr Alainy Street, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

SICOT J. 2019 Jan;5:8. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2019002. Epub 2019 Feb 8.

DOI:10.1051/sicotj/2019002
PMID:30834889
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6405254/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Integrated cage and screw designs were introduced for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and allegedly are superior to anterior plating due to their minimal anterior profile.

METHODS

A descriptive study was designed as a prospective case series of 25 patients (30 operated discs) with cervical disc disease treated with a zero-profile cage, and followed up for an average of 16 months (range 12 -18 months). Functional assessment was done with the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Visual analog scale (VAS) scores for arm and neck pain. Furthermore, Nurick's classification system for myelopathy based on gait abnormalities was documented. Radiological fusion was confirmed with plain X-rays and when indicated with a CT scan at 12 months postoperatively. Dysphagia was classified according to the Bazaz criteria.

RESULTS

VAS for neck and arm pain, NDI, and Nurick Score immediately improved postoperatively and remained so at 12-month follow-up. Fusion was achieved in 19 patients (95%) at six months and in 20 patients (100%) of the single-level group at one year. At six months 80% (four patients) and at 12 months 100% (five patients) showed complete union in the double-level group. No evidence of cage subsidence was noted radiographically.

DISCUSSION

The favorable lordosis and fusion rates of the low-profile integrated device are consistent with ACDF using anterior plating. Additionally, improved pain and an acceptable rate of dysphagia support the use of integrated interbody spacers for use in ACDF procedures.

摘要

引言

一体化椎间融合器和螺钉设计被引入用于颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF),据称由于其最小的前路外形,优于前路钢板固定。

方法

设计了一项描述性研究,作为对25例(30个手术椎间盘)颈椎间盘疾病患者采用零轮廓椎间融合器治疗的前瞻性病例系列,平均随访16个月(范围12 - 18个月)。使用颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)以及手臂和颈部疼痛的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分进行功能评估。此外,记录基于步态异常的Nurick脊髓病分类系统。术后12个月通过普通X线片确认放射学融合,必要时进行CT扫描。根据Bazaz标准对吞咽困难进行分类。

结果

颈部和手臂疼痛的VAS、NDI以及Nurick评分术后立即改善,并在12个月随访时保持改善。6个月时19例患者(95%)实现融合,单节段组1年时20例患者(100%)实现融合。双节段组6个月时80%(4例患者)以及12个月时100%(5例患者)显示完全融合。影像学检查未发现椎间融合器下沉的证据。

讨论

低轮廓一体化装置良好的前凸和融合率与使用前路钢板固定的ACDF一致。此外,疼痛改善以及可接受的吞咽困难发生率支持在ACDF手术中使用一体化椎间融合器。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/732e/6405254/95b0d9b17f8f/sicotj-5-8-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/732e/6405254/310d53b7b3d5/sicotj-5-8-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/732e/6405254/95b0d9b17f8f/sicotj-5-8-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/732e/6405254/310d53b7b3d5/sicotj-5-8-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/732e/6405254/95b0d9b17f8f/sicotj-5-8-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
The use of anterior cervical interbody spacer with integrated fixation screws for management of cervical disc disease.使用带有一体式固定螺钉的颈椎前路椎间融合器治疗颈椎间盘疾病。
SICOT J. 2019 Jan;5:8. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2019002. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
2
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a zero-profile integrated plate and spacer device: a clinical and radiological study: Clinical article.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术联合零切迹一体化板和间隔器装置:一项临床和影像学研究:临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Oct;21(4):529-37. doi: 10.3171/2014.6.SPINE12951. Epub 2014 Aug 8.
3
Early Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Study Evaluating an Integrated Screw and Interbody Spacer for One- and Two-Level ACDF.评估一体式螺钉与椎间融合器用于单节段和双节段ACDF的早期影像学和临床结果研究
Int J Spine Surg. 2015 Jul 17;9:39. doi: 10.14444/2039. eCollection 2015.
4
The ROI-C zero-profile anchored spacer for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: biomechanical profile and clinical outcomes.用于颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的ROI-C零轮廓锚定椎间融合器:生物力学特征及临床疗效
Med Devices (Auckl). 2017 Apr 18;10:61-69. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S127133. eCollection 2017.
5
A Prospective Study of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Zero-Profile Cage Screw Implants for Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Is Segmental Lordosis Maintained at 2 Years?零轮廓椎间融合器螺钉植入物用于单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的临床和影像学结果的前瞻性研究:2 年时节段性前凸是否得以维持?
Asian Spine J. 2017 Apr;11(2):264-271. doi: 10.4184/asj.2017.11.2.264. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
6
Integrated intervertebral device for anterior cervical fusion: An initial experience.用于颈椎前路融合的一体化椎间装置:初步经验。
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2012 Jul;3(2):52-7. doi: 10.4103/0974-8237.116539.
7
Cervical kinematics and radiological changes after Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion.与融合术相比,Discover人工椎间盘置换术后的颈椎运动学及影像学变化。
Spine J. 2014 Jun 1;14(6):867-77. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.432. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
8
Multilevel Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion with Zero-Profile Devices: Analysis of Safety and Feasibility, with Focus on Sagittal Alignment and Impact on Clinical Outcome: Single-Institution Experience and Review of Literature.多级前路颈椎间盘切除融合术与零切迹装置:安全性和可行性分析,重点关注矢状面排列及对临床结果的影响:单机构经验及文献综述
World Neurosurg. 2017 Oct;106:724-735. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.051. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
9
Influence of plate fixation on cervical height and alignment after one- or two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.单节段或双节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后钢板固定对颈椎高度及对线的影响。
Br J Neurosurg. 2018 Apr;32(2):188-195. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2017.1394980. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
10
A prospective clinical and radiographic 12-month outcome study of patients undergoing single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease utilizing a novel viable allogeneic, cancellous, bone matrix (trinity evolution™) with a comparison to historical controls.一项针对有症状的颈椎退行性椎间盘疾病患者进行单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的前瞻性临床和影像学12个月结局研究,使用一种新型的活性同种异体松质骨基质(Trinity Evolution™),并与历史对照进行比较。
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jul;25(7):2233-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4414-7. Epub 2016 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Three-Dimensional Printed Anterior Cervical Standalone Combined Cage-Plate-300 Consecutive Medical Implants.三维打印颈椎前路独立组合式椎间融合器-钢板——300例连续医用植入物
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2025 May 14;9(5). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00245. eCollection 2025 May 1.
2
A retrospective comparative analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using stand-alone titanium cage versus cage and plate fixation in two-level cervical disc herniation.对采用独立钛笼与笼加钢板固定进行两节段颈椎间盘突出症前路椎间盘切除融合术的回顾性比较分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Mar 10;20(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05654-x.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A cervical "zero-profile" cage with integrated angle-stable fixation: 24-months results.一种具有集成角度稳定固定功能的颈椎“零轮廓”椎间融合器:24个月的结果。
Acta Orthop Belg. 2014 Dec;80(4):558-66.
2
Biomechanics of an integrated interbody device versus ACDF anterior locking plate in a single-level cervical spine fusion construct.一体式椎间融合器与单节段颈椎融合构建中 ACDF 前路锁定钢板的生物力学比较
Spine J. 2014 Jan;14(1):128-36. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.088. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
3
Zero-P: a new zero-profile cage-plate device for single and multilevel ACDF. A single institution series with four years maximum follow-up and review of the literature on zero-profile devices.
A systematic review of risk factors and adverse outcomes associated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery over the past decade.
对过去十年中与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术相关的危险因素和不良后果的系统评价。
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2024 Apr-Jun;15(2):141-152. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_168_23. Epub 2024 May 24.
4
Dysphagia as a Postoperative Complication of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.吞咽困难作为颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后的一种并发症
Cureus. 2022 Jul 15;14(7):e26888. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26888. eCollection 2022 Jul.
5
Biomechanical Study of Cervical Endplate Removal on Subsidence and Migration in Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.颈椎前路多节段椎间盘切除融合术中颈椎终板切除对沉降和移位影响的生物力学研究
Asian Spine J. 2022 Oct;16(5):615-624. doi: 10.31616/asj.2021.0424. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
Zero-P:一种用于单节段和多节段前路颈椎间盘切除融合术的新型零轮廓椎间融合器-钢板装置。一项来自单一机构的系列研究,最长随访四年,并对零轮廓装置的文献进行综述。
Eur Spine J. 2013 Nov;22 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S868-78. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-3005-0. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
4
Zero-profile Anchored Spacer Reduces Rate of Dysphagia Compared With ACDF With Anterior Plating.与前路钢板固定的ACDF相比,零轮廓锚定间隔器可降低吞咽困难发生率。
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015 Jun;28(5):E284-90. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31828873ed.
5
Stand-alone anchored spacer versus anterior plate for multilevel anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion.用于多节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的独立锚定椎间融合器与前路钢板的比较
Orthopedics. 2012 Oct;35(10):e1503-10. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20120919-20.
6
A comparative biomechanical study of a novel integrated plate spacer for stabilization of cervical spine: an in vitro human cadaveric model.一种用于颈椎稳定的新型一体化椎间融合器的比较生物力学研究:体外人体尸体模型
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2012 Jul;27(6):532-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.12.013. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
7
Three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with self-locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone cages.三平面前路颈椎间盘切除融合术联合自锁式聚醚醚酮椎间融合器。
J Clin Neurosci. 2011 Nov;18(11):1505-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2011.02.045. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
8
A new zero-profile implant for stand-alone anterior cervical interbody fusion.一种用于单纯前路颈椎椎间融合术的新型零切迹植入物。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Mar;469(3):666-73. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1597-9.
9
Plate augmentation in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with cage for degenerative cervical spinal disorders.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术中使用 cage 进行骨板増强治疗退行性颈椎脊柱疾病。
Eur Spine J. 2010 Oct;19(10):1677-83. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1283-3. Epub 2010 Feb 21.
10
The efficacy of plate construct augmentation versus cage alone in anterior cervical fusion.钢板结构增强与单纯使用 cage 在颈椎前路融合中的疗效比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Dec 15;34(26):2886-92. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b64f2c.