Philip Morris International R&D, Philip Morris Products S.A., Quai Jeanrenaud 5, 2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Altria Client Services LLC, Richmond, VA, 23219, USA.
Intern Emerg Med. 2019 Sep;14(6):863-883. doi: 10.1007/s11739-019-02055-x. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
In the context of tobacco harm-reduction strategy, the potential reduced impact of electronic cigarette (EC) exposure should be evaluated relative to the impact of cigarette smoke exposure. We conducted a series of in vitro studies to compare the biological impact of an acute exposure to aerosols of "test mix" (flavors, nicotine, and humectants), "base" (nicotine and humectants), and "carrier" (humectants) formulations using MarkTen EC devices with the impact of exposure to smoke of 3R4F reference cigarettes, at a matching puff number, using human organotypic air-liquid interface buccal and small airway cultures. We measured the concentrations of nicotine and carbonyls deposited in the exposure chamber after each exposure experiment. The deposited carbonyl concentrations were used as representative measures to assess the reduced exposure to potentially toxic volatile substances. We followed a systems toxicology approach whereby functional biological endpoints, such as histopathology and ciliary beating frequency, were complemented by multiplex and omics assays to measure secreted inflammatory proteins and whole-genome transcriptomes, respectively. Among the endpoints analyzed, the only parameters that showed a significant response to EC exposure were secretion of proteins and whole-genome transcriptomes. Based on the multiplex and omics analyzes, the cellular responses to EC aerosol exposure were tissue type-specific; however, those alterations were much smaller than those following cigarette smoke exposure, even when the EC aerosol exposure under the testing conditions resulted in a deposited nicotine concentration approximately 200 times that in saliva of EC users.
在烟草危害降低策略的背景下,应评估电子烟(EC)暴露的潜在影响降低程度,与香烟烟雾暴露的影响进行比较。我们进行了一系列体外研究,使用 MarkTen EC 设备比较了“测试混合物”(香料、尼古丁和保湿剂)、“基础”(尼古丁和保湿剂)和“载体”(保湿剂)气溶胶制剂的急性暴露与 3R4F 参考香烟烟雾暴露对人器官型气液界面颊和小气道培养物的影响,以匹配吸数。我们测量了每次暴露实验后沉积在暴露室中的尼古丁和羰基的浓度。沉积的羰基浓度被用作评估潜在有毒挥发性物质暴露减少的代表性措施。我们采用系统毒理学方法,即补充功能生物学终点(如组织病理学和纤毛摆动频率),以及通过多重和组学分析分别测量分泌的炎症蛋白和全基因组转录组。在分析的终点中,唯一对 EC 暴露有显著反应的参数是蛋白质和全基因组转录组的分泌。基于多重和组学分析,EC 气溶胶暴露引起的细胞反应具有组织类型特异性;然而,即使在测试条件下 EC 气溶胶暴露导致沉积的尼古丁浓度大约是 EC 用户唾液中浓度的 200 倍,这些改变也比香烟烟雾暴露小得多。