Penn State University, Department of Public Health Sciences, Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, College of Medicine, 500 University Dr., Hershey, PA 17033, United States.
Penn State University, Department of Public Health Sciences, Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, College of Medicine, 500 University Dr., Hershey, PA 17033, United States.
Addict Behav. 2019 Apr;91:95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.10.041. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
There is limited evidence about the effects of dual electronic cigarette (e-cig) and combustible cigarette use on lung health or other health outcomes. Studies that have evaluated these outcomes have not included estimates of e-cig or cigarette exposure in the analyses.
Data analyzed were from 263 smokers participating in a randomized controlled trial designed to encourage participants to reduce their combustible cigarette use by substituting with an e-cig or a non-electronic cigarette substitute (cig-sub). t-tests were used to evaluate changes from baseline at 1 month and 3 months in lung function, blood pressure, pulse, exhaled carbon monoxide, and weight. Linear mixed effects models were used to test associations between health outcomes and study product group, including exposure to the study products (e-cig and cig-sub times used and days used in the past 7 days) and cigarettes per day (CPD).
There were few significant differences between the groups for lung function indices at any time point in the unadjusted analyses. There were significant reductions in diastolic blood pressure and pulse at 1 month in the unadjusted analyses for those in the e-cig group compared to the cig-sub group. CPD decreased significantly more for the e-cig group than for the cig-sub group at both time points. There were no significant associations between any measured health outcomes and group in the linear mixed effects models.
E-cig use did not contribute to significant changes in health outcome markers as compared with use of a non-electronic cig-sub.
关于双重使用电子烟(e-cig)和可燃香烟对肺部健康或其他健康结果的影响,证据有限。评估这些结果的研究在分析中没有包括对电子烟或香烟暴露的估计。
分析的数据来自 263 名吸烟者,他们参加了一项随机对照试验,旨在通过用电子烟或非电子香烟替代品(香烟替代品)替代来鼓励参与者减少可燃香烟的使用。t 检验用于评估 1 个月和 3 个月时肺功能、血压、脉搏、呼出一氧化碳和体重的基线变化。线性混合效应模型用于测试健康结果与研究产品组之间的关联,包括对研究产品(电子烟和香烟替代品的使用次数和过去 7 天的使用天数)和每天吸烟量(CPD)的暴露。
在未调整分析中,任何时间点各组之间的肺功能指标差异都很小。与香烟替代品组相比,电子烟组在 1 个月时的舒张压和脉搏明显降低。电子烟组的 CPD 在两个时间点都比香烟替代品组显著减少。在线性混合效应模型中,任何测量的健康结果与组之间均无显著关联。
与使用非电子香烟替代品相比,电子烟的使用并没有导致健康结果指标的显著变化。