Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Colorado State University, Campus Delivery 1021, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
Department of Human Dimensions of Natural Resources, Colorado State University, Campus Delivery 1480, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
Environ Manage. 2019 May;63(5):583-595. doi: 10.1007/s00267-019-01152-z. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
Despite increased research characterizing the adaptive capacity of households and communities, there are few empirical studies that test why farmers adopt costly climate-related adaptive strategies, which strategies are implemented, and farmers' perceptions of climate changes. In this study, we analyzed determinants for smallholder farmer adoption of adaptation strategies in Chiapas, Mexico. We conducted 291 surveys with landowners in eight coffee farming communities. Farmers were asked which of 21 adaptation strategies they had engaged in, within five categories: migration, storage, land use diversification, community investment, and market exchange. We found the most frequent strategies included planting shade coffee, diversifying crop varieties, shifting sow date, building living walls, reforesting, or engaging in soil conservation. Although many farmers have experienced natural disasters like hurricanes and earthquakes, they were most concerned by long-term threats to crops like coffee rust and higher temperatures, that require costly adaptive investments. We find farmers adapt to climate events because of their vulnerability context (i.e., experience with disasters and distance to markets). Land holdings (i.e., natural capital), farm equipment (i.e., physical capital), and group membership (i.e., social capital), were also key factors influencing adaptation. Finally, farmers with strong perceptions of drought and temperature change were most likely to adapt. These results suggest policy makers should have a multi-pronged approach to: improve farmers' resource base through explicitly promoting adaptation strategies like crop and income diversification; inform climate perceptions through workshops on climate and weather; and strengthen participation in community and producer organizations to increase smallholder adaptation.
尽管越来越多的研究描述了家庭和社区的适应能力,但很少有实证研究测试为什么农民会采用昂贵的与气候相关的适应策略,实施了哪些策略,以及农民对气候变化的看法。在这项研究中,我们分析了墨西哥恰帕斯州小农户采用适应策略的决定因素。我们在八个咖啡种植社区对 291 名土地所有者进行了调查。农民被要求在五个类别中选择他们参与了 21 项适应策略中的哪一项:迁移、储存、土地利用多样化、社区投资和市场交换。我们发现最常见的策略包括种植遮荫咖啡、多样化作物品种、改变母猪日期、建造活墙、重新造林或进行土壤保护。尽管许多农民经历过飓风和地震等自然灾害,但他们最关心的是咖啡锈病和更高温度等对作物的长期威胁,这些威胁需要昂贵的适应投资。我们发现农民会因脆弱性背景(即经历过灾害和距离市场的远近)而适应气候事件。土地持有量(即自然资本)、农业设备(即物质资本)和群体成员身份(即社会资本)也是影响适应的关键因素。最后,对干旱和温度变化感知强烈的农民最有可能适应。这些结果表明,政策制定者应该采取多管齐下的方法:通过明确推广作物和收入多样化等适应策略来改善农民的资源基础;通过关于气候和天气的研讨会来告知气候感知;并加强参与社区和生产者组织,以增加小农户的适应能力。
Environ Manage. 2018-10-19
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020-5-30
J Environ Manage. 2019-12-9
Sci Total Environ. 2021-10-20
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021-5-17
Nature. 2013-1-31
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007-12-11
Health Policy Plan. 2006-11