• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于阈值连接与共享临床事件构建的医生网络比较。

Comparison of physician networks constructed from thresholded ties versus shared clinical episodes.

作者信息

Onnela Jukka-Pekka, O'Malley A James, Keating Nancy L, Landon Bruce E

机构信息

1Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, 655 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA USA.

2Department of Biomedical Data Science, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH USA.

出版信息

Appl Netw Sci. 2018;3(1):28. doi: 10.1007/s41109-018-0084-1. Epub 2018 Aug 13.

DOI:10.1007/s41109-018-0084-1
PMID:30839809
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6214299/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare standard methods for constructing physician networks from patient-physician encounter data with a new method based on clinical episodes of care.

DATA SOURCE

We used data on 100% of traditional Medicare beneficiaries from 51 nationally representative geographical regions for the years 2005-2010.

STUDY DESIGN

We constructed networks of physicians based on their shared patients. In the fixed-threshold networks and adaptive-threshold networks, we included data on all patient-physician encounters to form the physician-physician ties, and then subsequently thresholded some proportion of the strongest ties. In contrast, in the episode-based approach, only those patient-physician encounters that occurred within shared clinical episodes treating specific conditions contributed towards physician-physician ties.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We extracted clinical episodes in the Medicare data and investigated structural properties of the patient-sharing networks of physicians, temporal dynamics of their ties, and temporal stability of network communities across the two approaches.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The episode-based networks accentuated ties between primary care physicians (PCPs) and medical specialists, had ties that were more likely to reappear in the future, and appeared to have more fluid community structure.

CONCLUSIONS

Constructing physician networks around shared episodes of care is a clinically sound alternative to previous approaches to network construction that does not require arbitrary decisions about thresholding. The resulting networks capture somewhat different aspects of patient-physician encounters.

摘要

目的

比较从患者-医生诊疗数据构建医生网络的标准方法与基于临床护理事件的新方法。

数据来源

我们使用了2005 - 2010年来自51个具有全国代表性地理区域的100%传统医疗保险受益人的数据。

研究设计

我们基于医生共享的患者构建医生网络。在固定阈值网络和自适应阈值网络中,我们纳入了所有患者-医生诊疗数据以形成医生-医生联系,然后对一定比例的最强联系设置阈值。相比之下,在基于事件的方法中,只有那些在治疗特定疾病的共享临床事件中发生的患者-医生诊疗才构成医生-医生联系。

数据收集/提取方法:我们从医疗保险数据中提取临床事件,并研究医生的患者共享网络的结构特性、其联系的时间动态以及两种方法下网络社区的时间稳定性。

主要发现

基于事件的网络突出了初级保健医生(PCP)与医学专家之间的联系,其联系在未来更有可能再次出现,并且似乎具有更灵活的社区结构。

结论

围绕共享护理事件构建医生网络是一种临床上合理的替代先前网络构建方法的方式,无需对阈值进行任意决策。由此产生的网络捕捉了患者-医生诊疗的一些不同方面。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2493/6214299/a6257334ddc5/41109_2018_84_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2493/6214299/1013fa5b0390/41109_2018_84_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2493/6214299/e8ac4299cda5/41109_2018_84_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2493/6214299/a6257334ddc5/41109_2018_84_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2493/6214299/1013fa5b0390/41109_2018_84_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2493/6214299/e8ac4299cda5/41109_2018_84_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2493/6214299/a6257334ddc5/41109_2018_84_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of physician networks constructed from thresholded ties versus shared clinical episodes.基于阈值连接与共享临床事件构建的医生网络比较。
Appl Netw Sci. 2018;3(1):28. doi: 10.1007/s41109-018-0084-1. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
2
Physician patient sharing relationships within insurance plan networks.保险计划网络内的医患共享关系。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct;58(5):1056-1065. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14138. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
3
Patient-Sharing Networks of Physicians and Health Care Utilization and Spending Among Medicare Beneficiaries.医生患者共享网络与医疗保险受益人的医疗利用和支出
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jan 1;178(1):66-73. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.5034.
4
Variation in patient-sharing networks of physicians across the United States.美国医生间的患者共享网络的差异。
JAMA. 2012 Jul 18;308(3):265-73. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.7615.
5
Using administrative data to identify naturally occurring networks of physicians.利用管理数据识别自然形成的医师网络。
Med Care. 2013 Aug;51(8):715-21. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182977991.
6
The impact of sampling patients on measuring physician patient-sharing networks using Medicare data.利用医疗保险数据抽样患者对衡量医生-患者共享网络的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct 14;56(2):323-33. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13568.
7
Physician patient-sharing networks and the cost and intensity of care in US hospitals.美国医院的医患共享网络与医疗成本和护理强度
Med Care. 2012 Feb;50(2):152-60. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31822dcef7.
8
Return to sender: Unraveling the role of structural and social network ties in patient sharing networks.退回原处:解析结构和社会网络关系在患者共享网络中的作用。
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Jan;340:116351. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116351. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
9
Estimating the impact of physician risky-prescribing on the network structure underlying physician shared-patient relationships.评估医生危险处方行为对医生共享患者关系所基于的网络结构的影响。
Res Sq. 2024 Mar 26:rs.3.rs-4139630. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4139630/v1.
10
Repeated, Close Physician Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Teams Associated with Greater Teamwork.重复的、紧密的医生冠状动脉旁路移植手术团队与更好的团队合作相关。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr;53(2):1025-1041. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12703. Epub 2017 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying opioid agonist treatment prescriber networks from health administrative data: A validation study.从卫生行政数据中识别阿片类激动剂治疗处方医生网络:一项验证研究。
PLoS One. 2025 May 16;20(5):e0322064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322064. eCollection 2025.
2
Considerations for Social Networks and Health Data Sharing: An Overview.社交网络与健康数据共享的考量:概述
Ann Epidemiol. 2025 Feb;102:28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2024.12.014. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
3
Optimal Physician Shared-Patient Networks and the Diffusion of Medical Technologies.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of Informal Clinical Integration of Physicians With Cardiac Surgery Payments.医生非正式临床整合与心脏手术支付的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2018 May 1;153(5):446-453. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.5150.
2
Geographic Variations in Physician Relationships Over Time: Implications for Care Coordination.医生关系随时间的地理差异:对护理协调的影响。
Med Care Res Rev. 2018 Oct;75(5):586-611. doi: 10.1177/1077558717697016. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
3
Repeated, Close Physician Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Teams Associated with Greater Teamwork.
最佳医生共享患者网络与医疗技术的传播。
J Data Sci. 2023 Jul;21(3):578-598. doi: 10.6339/22-jds1064. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
4
Can peer effects explain prescribing appropriateness? a social network analysis.同伴效应能否解释处方的适宜性?一项社会网络分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Oct 28;23(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02048-7.
5
Care fragmentation predicts 90-day durable ventricular assist device outcomes.护理碎片化可预测 90 天耐用性心室辅助装置结局。
Am J Manag Care. 2022 Dec 1;28(12):e444-e451. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2022.89280.
6
Beyond patient-sharing: Comparing physician- and patient-induced networks.超越患者共享:比较医生和患者诱导的网络。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2022 Sep;25(3):498-514. doi: 10.1007/s10729-022-09595-3. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
7
Tie Decay and Dissolution: Contentious Prescribing Practices in the Prescription Drug Epidemic.铁的衰变与溶解:处方药泛滥中存在争议的处方行为。
Organ Sci (Linthicum). 2021 Sep-Oct;32(5):1149-1173. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2020.1412. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
8
Embracing the Complexity of Primary Health Care: System-Based Tools and Strategies for Researching the Case Management Process.接纳初级卫生保健的复杂性:用于研究病例管理过程的基于系统的工具和策略。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Oct 6;14:2817-2826. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S327260. eCollection 2021.
9
The Role of Physician Professional Networks in Physicians' Receipt of Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Industries' Payments.医生专业网络在医生接受医药和医疗器械行业支付中的作用。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jul;36(7):1858-1866. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06802-9. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
10
Assessment of Racial Disparities in Primary Care Physician Specialty Referrals.评估初级保健医生专业转诊中的种族差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2029238. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.29238.
重复的、紧密的医生冠状动脉旁路移植手术团队与更好的团队合作相关。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr;53(2):1025-1041. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12703. Epub 2017 May 4.
4
Association Between Physician Teamwork and Health System Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.冠状动脉旁路移植术后医生团队合作与卫生系统结局之间的关联
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 Nov;9(6):641-648. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.002714. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
5
Provider Patient-Sharing Networks and Multiple-Provider Prescribing of Benzodiazepines.医疗服务提供者患者共享网络与苯二氮䓬类药物的多医疗服务提供者处方开具
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Feb;31(2):164-171. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3470-8. Epub 2015 Jul 18.
6
Differences between physician social networks for cardiac surgery serving communities with high versus low proportions of black residents.为黑人居民比例高和低的社区提供心脏手术服务的医生社交网络之间的差异。
Med Care. 2015 Feb;53(2):160-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000291.
7
Provider collaboration: cohesion, constellations, and shared patients.医疗服务提供者合作:凝聚力、群体关系及共享患者。
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Nov;29(11):1499-505. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2964-0. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
8
It's who you know: patient-sharing, quality, and costs of cancer survivorship care.知其人,知其事:癌症生存者护理的患者共享、质量和成本。
J Cancer Surviv. 2014 Jun;8(2):156-66. doi: 10.1007/s11764-014-0349-3. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
9
Using administrative data to identify naturally occurring networks of physicians.利用管理数据识别自然形成的医师网络。
Med Care. 2013 Aug;51(8):715-21. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182977991.
10
Variation in patient-sharing networks of physicians across the United States.美国医生间的患者共享网络的差异。
JAMA. 2012 Jul 18;308(3):265-73. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.7615.