Zhang Victoria Shu, King Marissa D
Yale School of Management, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511.
Organ Sci (Linthicum). 2021 Sep-Oct;32(5):1149-1173. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2020.1412. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
Although a substantial body of work has investigated drivers of tie formation, there is growing interest in understanding why relationships decay or dissolve altogether. The networks literature has tended to conceptualize tie decay as driven by processes similar to those underlying tie formation. Yet information that is revealed through ongoing interactions can exert different effects on tie formation and tie decay. This paper investigates how tie decay and tie formation processes differ by focusing on contentious practices. To the extent that information about dissimilarities in contentious practices is learned through ongoing interactions, it can exert diverging effects on tie formation and tie decay. Using a longitudinal data set of 141,543 physician dyads, we find that differences in contentious prescribing led ties to weaken or dissolve altogether but did not affect tie formation. The more contentious the practice and the more information available about the practice, the stronger the effect on tie decay and dissolution. Collectively, these findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of relationship evolution as an unfolding process through which deeper-level differences are revealed and shape the outcome of the tie.
尽管已有大量研究探讨了关系形成的驱动因素,但人们越来越关注理解关系为何会衰退或完全瓦解。网络文献倾向于将关系衰退概念化为由与关系形成背后的过程类似的过程驱动。然而,通过持续互动所揭示的信息对关系形成和关系衰退可能会产生不同的影响。本文通过关注有争议的行为来研究关系衰退和关系形成过程有何不同。如果关于有争议行为差异的信息是通过持续互动得知的,那么它可能会对关系形成和关系衰退产生不同的影响。利用一个包含141,543对医生二元组的纵向数据集,我们发现有争议的处方差异会导致关系减弱或完全瓦解,但不会影响关系形成。行为的争议性越大,以及关于该行为的可用信息越多,则对关系衰退和解散的影响就越强。总体而言,这些发现有助于更细致入微地理解关系演变,将其视为一个不断展开的过程,在此过程中,更深层次的差异得以揭示并塑造关系的结果。